Author Topic: Should same-sex marriage be legal?  (Read 28155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rebel

  • Stick a fork in us. We're done.
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16790
  • Reputation: +1248/-215
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #100 on: March 26, 2011, 01:05:57 AM »
We aren't talking about conscience people here. Someone conscience can designate whomever the hell they want to come visit. I could have call girls visiting me. It's my choice as a paying patient.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline ChristianMIller

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 12
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #101 on: March 26, 2011, 01:55:57 AM »
We aren't talking about conscience people here. Someone conscience can designate whomever the hell they want to come visit. I could have call girls visiting me. It's my choice as a paying patient.

If someone, married or single, really cares about hospital visitation if unconscious, medical decision making if incapacitated, then he can prepare advance instructions, living will, durable power of attorney.  It is much better than relying on the default provisions of marriage law.

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #102 on: March 26, 2011, 04:24:57 AM »
So far no one has mentioned that some States recognise what is called Common Law marriage between a man and a woman that have lived together for some time.

One can get into real trouble from hoodwinking the public with this. 

I know of 2 sad tales about the mess one can get into---both couples had been together for 30+ years when it was found that the woman had been collecting on their departed first husbands SS payments and or pensions.   Both woman knew that if they remarried they would have to give up the payments so they just told everyone they had remarried. When the woman died it became a nightmare for the men who survived them, wills were contested, step children came into the picture and took money, property EVERY thing they and the kids mother had bought together out from under them.

Marriage is to protect both partners not just woman and their children.   [OR does it]  Then the mess one gets into without really thinking about it.

Coworker hit retirement age and went to apply for SS. she was asked if she wished to collect on her own or her ex husbands   She had not seen the man in 20 years and had no idea he was dead or remarried.

 Now the kicker, the new wife had been married to her ex for 10 years or so and was collecting his survivor benefits,  this came out of the blue for the newest wife and everything went to court.   This was a real mess for the latest widow as her hubby had been married to his first wife for 20+ years and had 7 kids by the first wife.  Who was more entitled to his SS checks his pension, and assets, first or second wife????  His 7 kids wanted in on the money and he had not made out a will.

Why and how this turned out I have no idea, but Anyone that marries a man or women needs to be prepared for some big time shocks down the road if they have children by an ex spouse or been married to another more then 10 years.

Why in HELL gays want to get married is beyond me, or come to think about it heterosexuals ----who do or don't get  caught up in all of this have no guarantee of anything, once a partner or spouse dies---there will be trouble on the way.     

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2233/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #103 on: March 26, 2011, 06:13:57 AM »
The government needs to get out of the civil union business as well. There is no reason couples with marriage licenses or civil unions should get more benefits and money from the government than single people or couples without marriage licenses/civil unions.
Every society across the globe throughout all history disagrees with you.

Maybe you're just smarter than they are.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #104 on: March 26, 2011, 07:35:04 AM »
The company that I work at is a Fortune 17 corporation. It has adopted some of the most liberal, loosely-defined rules toward identification of "spouse" or "partner" that I've ever seen.

Gays, lesbians, trannies, they ALL enjoy the SAME benefits as married employees. There is not ONE difference in how benefits are determined. Even bereavement includes blood and marriage-relatives from your gay or lezzie "partner".

My company is no different from many I've seen. I've seen these corporations fall all over themselves to be inclusive and accepting of that abnormal lifestyle to the point that it's ridiculous.

Case in point: My company posted on its intranet all kinds of "LGBT Recognition" bullshit back in the late fall. But they completely forgot about Veterans Day on Nov. 11.

When I saw that, I was incensed. I fired off an email to the entity responsible at 7 a.m. that morning and questioned the so-called "inclusiveness" that the corporation's masters and policymakers spout off on a regular basis. By 10 a.m., somebody had posted some kind of lame "Happy Veterans Day" thing on the intranet. It was hurriedly written and insincere, but they did put something up.

A response to me on my questions? <crickets>

Society itself dictates what sort of ramifications an individual endures because of lifestyle choices. You want to name your kid Dweezil? Then be prepared for your kid to be ridiculed at school. You want to paint your house purple? Then be prepared for a lawsuit if you live in an area that forbids that kind of thing. You want to pick your nose and eat your boogers in public? Then be prepared to be ostracized.

For the gays and lesbians that live their lives quietly and without pretense, a civil union might be a compromise that we can live with. But marriage? No friggin' way, Ray. Marriage has its roots in society as a union between man and woman.

Those who are pushing for marriage for these people, gay and straight alike, are trying to have it both ways.

There's a price to pay for being abnormal. You want to be weird? No problem, but stop trying to push for something that society decrees you can't have.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #105 on: March 26, 2011, 08:46:06 AM »
The company that I work at is a Fortune 17 corporation. It has adopted some of the most liberal, loosely-defined rules toward identification of "spouse" or "partner" that I've ever seen.

Gays, lesbians, trannies, they ALL enjoy the SAME benefits as married employees. There is not ONE difference in how benefits are determined. Even bereavement includes blood and marriage-relatives from your gay or lezzie "partner".

My company is no different from many I've seen. I've seen these corporations fall all over themselves to be inclusive and accepting of that abnormal lifestyle to the point that it's ridiculous.

Case in point: My company posted on its intranet all kinds of "LGBT Recognition" bullshit back in the late fall. But they completely forgot about Veterans Day on Nov. 11.

When I saw that, I was incensed. I fired off an email to the entity responsible at 7 a.m. that morning and questioned the so-called "inclusiveness" that the corporation's masters and policymakers spout off on a regular basis. By 10 a.m., somebody had posted some kind of lame "Happy Veterans Day" thing on the intranet. It was hurriedly written and insincere, but they did put something up.

A response to me on my questions? <crickets>

Society itself dictates what sort of ramifications an individual endures because of lifestyle choices. You want to name your kid Dweezil? Then be prepared for your kid to be ridiculed at school. You want to paint your house purple? Then be prepared for a lawsuit if you live in an area that forbids that kind of thing. You want to pick your nose and eat your boogers in public? Then be prepared to be ostracized.

For the gays and lesbians that live their lives quietly and without pretense, a civil union might be a compromise that we can live with. But marriage? No friggin' way, Ray. Marriage has its roots in society as a union between man and woman.

Those who are pushing for marriage for these people, gay and straight alike, are trying to have it both ways.

There's a price to pay for being abnormal. You want to be weird? No problem, but stop trying to push for something that society decrees you can't have.

So are you saying that anyone that is abnormal needs to keep to themself, ???? Lots of abnormal out there, the blind, the deaf and those in wheel chairs or need a cane to walk.

Who is to choose what is normal for humans, is there a normal way for a gay to act, a bipolar to act, how about a killer or a thief, is there some way they should act.??

Do we rid ourselves of the people that make a living by being something but what they are---No more movies, all actors out of a job.

Take away all people that write books based on their imagination, they are definitely not normal like you and me.

It is the abnormal different people that become artists and composers, those like Einstein that was as abnormal as one can get.

Don't jump to far EUPHER, there are bound to be millions of people in this world that will consider your life style, odd an aberration, evil or totally useless to human kind.

Offline rubliw

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
  • Reputation: +17/-513
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #106 on: March 26, 2011, 08:54:35 AM »

For the gays and lesbians that live their lives quietly and without pretense, a civil union might be a compromise that we can live with. But marriage? No friggin' way, Ray. Marriage has its roots in society as a union between man and woman.

The problem with civil unions is they are state by state - and there is no federal mandate that other states recognize them, like with marriage.   If you get married in one state, every state has to recognize it...   though we'll see what happens with Obama's posture regarding DOMA (the bill signed by Clinton which gave states permission to not recognize same-sex marriages).

Quote
Society itself dictates what sort of ramifications an individual endures because of lifestyle choices. You want to name your kid Dweezil? Then be prepared for your kid to be ridiculed at school. You want to paint your house purple? Then be prepared for a lawsuit if you live in an area that forbids that kind of thing. You want to pick your nose and eat your boogers in public? Then be prepared to be ostracized.

Those who are pushing for marriage for these people, gay and straight alike, are trying to have it both ways.

There's a price to pay for being abnormal. You want to be weird? No problem, but stop trying to push for something that society decrees you can't have.

Society is often wrong and irrational about the sorts of social pressures it exerts upon people or groups, and does so to the great harm of many.  So I don't know why the heck you think its the duty of homosexuals to simply sit there and quietly accept scorn and ridicule, etc, all for the courtesy of not making YOU feel uncomfortable or weird.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 09:09:36 AM by rubliw »

Offline ChristianMIller

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 12
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #107 on: March 26, 2011, 09:42:19 AM »
Every society across the globe throughout all history disagrees with you.

Maybe you're just smarter than they are.

State government marriage licenses have only been around for a century or so. The US federal government has only been involved in paying financial marriage benefits for about 80 years. What do you think these marriage subsidies have accomplished in the last 80 years?

Offline ChristianMIller

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 12
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #108 on: March 26, 2011, 09:57:08 AM »
The company that I work at is a Fortune 17 corporation. It has adopted some of the most liberal, loosely-defined rules toward identification of "spouse" or "partner" that I've ever seen.

Gays, lesbians, trannies, they ALL enjoy the SAME benefits as married employees. There is not ONE difference in how benefits are determined. Even bereavement includes blood and marriage-relatives from your gay or lezzie "partner".

The small company that we started had a different approach. Our employees had diverse family situations. In the interest of fairness and simplicity, we paid 100% of our health care insurance for each employee but zero for family members, wives, girl friends, partners, children, divorced spouses, etc. Married employees got no greater compensation by virtue of being in a romantic relationship. We gave a set number of "personal" leave days that employees could use as they wished: sick, vacation, mental health days, bereavement, or I don't feel like working days. We did not have to make judgments about our employees personal lives. Was he really sick? Was it really his ex-wife who died?

Offline MP_Sarge

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
  • Reputation: +35/-70
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #109 on: March 26, 2011, 11:16:49 AM »
Ofer...

I suppose "trannies" (not that it's against the rules here, but FYI, that word is deeply offensive and considered hate language by the trans community, Eupher.  Anyway...)

I suppose transgender people shouldn't be permitted to marry, work, have relationships, or leave the house at all, huh?

Nunquam Honorandum Nisi Merito
 Transgender American Veterans

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #110 on: March 26, 2011, 11:17:45 AM »
The problem with civil unions is they are state by state - and there is no federal mandate that other states recognize them, like with marriage.   If you get married in one state, every state has to recognize it...   though we'll see what happens with Obama's posture regarding DOMA (the bill signed by Clinton which gave states permission to not recognize same-sex marriages).

Bingo. There is no federal mandate. And there shouldn't be. Tenth Amendment, anybody? If a liberal haven like New York wants to adopt policies that favor gays over straights, gays should flock there in droves, leaving the rest of the country relatively gay-free. Straights living there who don't favor such policies should move. The individual states have power -- or rather, they used to.

What's so difficult about this?

Yes - we'll see what happens with DOMA -- the federal law passed by a liberal pretending to be centrist and flat-out denied and refused by a socialist/marxist.

Quote
Society is often wrong and irrational about the sorts of social pressures it exerts upon people or groups, and does so to the great harm of many.  So I don't know why the heck you think its the duty of homosexuals to simply sit there and quietly accept scorn and ridicule, etc, all for the courtesy of not making YOU feel uncomfortable or weird.

Here, Wilbur, you fail again to see the point. Let me try again -- and I'll type slowly so you and your buddy Christian Miller can follow along:

Society is what society is. It has a life and a breath all its own. In a free society, intangibles like morality and values and ethics impacting the human condition (like the butt buddies and rug munchers, for example) cannot and should not be directed by government. This is where you liberals get lost.

Federal government is, by definition, a necessary evil. I believe that the fed. government has a role -- stipulated by the Constitution and limited by the Constitution. No more, no less.

When you start looking toward The Great Evil That Is Government to dictate to us what we (society) can and cannot do with each other, we have lost. We've lost our freedom and our ability to take accountability for ourselves. Without taking it too far off topic, we've seen this in the black community over and over again. Many blacks, having been told over and over again that The Great Evil That Is Government is the answer to all our problems, they begin to look to that entity rather than solve their own problems using their own keen intellect.

You libs are so worried about the fudgepackers and rugmunchers that you want to throw out EVERYBODY ELSE'S freedoms because of a few who have trouble establishing their own sexuality.

Society deals with these things in the way that society does. No amount of liberal legislation is going to change that -- but I have to give you libs your due.

You sure as hell are trying hard.

Now, Wilbur, you and I have been over and over this stuff. This is, by far, your pet issue. Somebody gins up a thread on gays, and you waltz in after weeks of absence and page after page after page, you ask your questions and state your opinion. Fine. This is the way you roll.

You aren't going to change my stance on this issue, and I seriously doubt that my stance won't affect you either. So this will be my last post directed toward you on this issue.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #111 on: March 26, 2011, 11:25:07 AM »
Ofer...

I suppose "trannies" (not that it's against the rules here, but FYI, that word is deeply offensive and considered hate language by the trans community, Eupher.  Anyway...)

I suppose transgender people shouldn't be permitted to marry, work, have relationships, or leave the house at all, huh?


The word "tranny" is deeply offensive, eh? Sorry - not in my world. It is what it is.

Maybe it should be flagged by the software and bleeped out.

You've got a vested interest in the issue. I do not, except that people who have issues with their birth sex to the point that they're taking definitive action to change their sex (to which they're fully free to do in a free society) are no more "entitled" to marriage, work, relationships, or leaving the house privileges than I have.

I am not going to knuckle under to some kind of PC agenda that intends to compel me to look upon such people as being "special". They are not.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline MP_Sarge

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
  • Reputation: +35/-70
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #112 on: March 26, 2011, 11:30:31 AM »
The same can be said for any offensive word.
If it doesn't bother you, and you don't mind that it's considered offensive by the population you're referring to, carry on.

So, who *should* transgender people be allowed to marry?

Kudos for correctly labeling the issue as one of sex and not gender [H5, actually], but I'm curious why you think sex always equates to gender?
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 11:32:48 AM by MP_Sarge »
Nunquam Honorandum Nisi Merito
 Transgender American Veterans

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #113 on: March 26, 2011, 11:31:28 AM »
The small company that we started had a different approach. Our employees had diverse family situations. In the interest of fairness and simplicity, we paid 100% of our health care insurance for each employee but zero for family members, wives, girl friends, partners, children, divorced spouses, etc. Married employees got no greater compensation by virtue of being in a romantic relationship. We gave a set number of "personal" leave days that employees could use as they wished: sick, vacation, mental health days, bereavement, or I don't feel like working days. We did not have to make judgments about our employees personal lives. Was he really sick? Was it really his ex-wife who died?

Congratulations. You have the freedom to set your own benefits, and arrange them in any way you choose. Small companies almost always don't have the same resources as larger corporations, so benefits are likely to be structured in such a way to give the biggest bang for the buck.

Your employees are free to work in your company, or leave based on all the criteria, to include benefits. If your intention is to build a company that is extremely tolerant for the issues you listed, you are free to do so. Other companies are also free to take a harder stance.

I've worked in both types of situations and after 13 years of working and building and searching for the ideal working situation for me and my wife - post Army-retirement - I found it. And I'm happy with it.

Those who wring their hands and cry "Woe is me!" because their bennies don't allow for this or that are barking up the wrong tree when they're looking for sympathy from me.

If they don't like their situation, they're free to change it.

That's the way it works.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #114 on: March 26, 2011, 11:43:26 AM »
So are you saying that anyone that is abnormal needs to keep to themself, ???? Lots of abnormal out there, the blind, the deaf and those in wheel chairs or need a cane to walk.

Stop putting words in my mouth. I said no such thing. What I said is that SOCIETY has its own ways of dealing with things.

Quote
Who is to choose what is normal for humans, is there a normal way for a gay to act, a bipolar to act, how about a killer or a thief, is there some way they should act.??

Society chooses -- and there's nothing you can do about that. Liberals do their best to mandate morality by legislation. That is what offends me -- in effort to "protect" those who are different, liberals want to curtail the freedoms of others.

Quote
Do we rid ourselves of the people that make a living by being something but what they are---No more movies, all actors out of a job.

Huh? Have you been smoking crack?

Quote
Take away all people that write books based on their imagination, they are definitely not normal like you and me.

Based on your comment just above, the jury's still out as to whether you're "normal" or not.

Quote
It is the abnormal different people that become artists and composers, those like Einstein that was as abnormal as one can get.

In a free society, people are free to be themselves WITHOUT government interference. Einstein was a clerk in some government office when he wrote the paper on his Theory of Relativity. Mozart died at the age of 34 after having written hundreds of compositions in his short life. He did so because he was gifted and he had people who depended on him for support.

So when people do what they're good at, that doesn't mean they're abnormal. When you start equating personal behavior with career and work, you're on dangerous ground.

Quote
Don't jump to far EUPHER, there are bound to be millions of people in this world that will consider your life style, odd an aberration, evil or totally useless to human kind.

I sincerely doubt you're in a position to dictate to me where I jump, how far I jump, and when I jump. And I have news for you, since you're a noob:

Being a musician by education, background, and training, I'm already an aberration -- particularly since I'm a low brass player.  :-)
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +362/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #115 on: March 26, 2011, 11:47:07 AM »

Being a musician by education, background, and training, I'm already an aberration -- particularly since I'm a low brass player.  :-)

Ain't THAT the truth!!!!  :whistling:
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #116 on: March 26, 2011, 11:51:50 AM »
The same can be said for any offensive word.
If it doesn't bother you, and you don't mind that it's considered offensive by the population you're referring to, carry on.

In your desperation to show me the error of my ways, you throw up your hands in disgust. Sorry -- I just don't play the PC game.

By your standards, am I supposed to fall all over myself in anger and frustration, being offended, hurt and otherwise beside myself because someone calls me a "knuckle-dragging tuba player"?

Your cross to bear is not mine as well. While I wish you well, don't expect me to adopt all manner of sensitivities to your plight. You've thought the issue through, and you've made your choice.

Now it's up to you to live with it.

Quote
So, who *should* transgender people be allowed to marry?

Good question. In a free society, though, they should hook up with whomever they choose. But with people in your situation, why is being "married" such a big deal? Isn't making the transition to the other sex/gender/whatever the overriding concern? What is it about a piece of paper that says "Married"? Why is that so important?

Quote
Kudos for correctly labeling the issue as one of sex and not gender [H5, actually], but I'm curious why you think sex always equates to gender?

Well, I guess that means I'm not the boorish buffoon after all. Sex, gender, it's all the same to me. One person is born with a set of equipment just like someone else of that same gender.

There's the "mental" element to that that is the great clarion call to which we all should muster. Or so says the PC crowd.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 11:54:20 AM by Eupher »
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline MP_Sarge

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
  • Reputation: +35/-70
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #117 on: March 26, 2011, 11:55:45 AM »
So much to respond to here.

Gotta drop the dog off at the groomer.  I'll get back to this.
Nunquam Honorandum Nisi Merito
 Transgender American Veterans

Offline rubliw

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
  • Reputation: +17/-513
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #118 on: March 26, 2011, 12:02:31 PM »
Society is what society is. It has a life and a breath all its own. In a free society, intangibles like morality and values and ethics impacting the human condition (like the butt buddies and rug munchers, for example) cannot and should not be directed by government. This is where you liberals get lost.

Federal government is, by definition, a necessary evil. I believe that the fed. government has a role -- stipulated by the Constitution and limited by the Constitution. No more, no less.

When you start looking toward The Great Evil That Is Government to dictate to us what we (society) can and cannot do with each other, we have lost. We've lost our freedom and our ability to take accountability for ourselves. Without taking it too far off topic, we've seen this in the black community over and over again. Many blacks, having been told over and over again that The Great Evil That Is Government is the answer to all our problems, they begin to look to that entity rather than solve their own problems using their own keen intellect.

What in the hell are you talking about?  

Either you believe the fed gov't has the power to regulate forms of marriage, or you don't.  If you don't, that's fine - we'll get rid of heterosexual marriage at the federal level as well, and nobody gets their cake.  But if you do, then there's nothing qualitatively different between the desire for a heterosexual marriage to be recognized by the gov't, or a homosexual marriage.   Either they are both inappropriate "handouts" or "federal entitlements run a muck",  or neither are.  Which is it?

In fact, you have it exactly backwards - the traditionalists here (ie, status quo fed gov't position on marriage, no same-sex marriage) are the ones wielding the fed to impose their ethics and morals upon others with the force of law.  

Quote
You libs are so worried about the fudgepackers and rugmunchers that you want to throw out EVERYBODY ELSE'S freedoms because of a few who have trouble establishing their own sexuality.

Uh yea..... Bob and Steve getting married really unfairly impinges upon your individual liberties.

Quote
Society deals with these things in the way that society does. No amount of liberal legislation is going to change that.

Yea, well society changes.  You should pay some mind to how its changing now.  If the current trajectory continues, it won't be the homosexuals who are "dealt with by society" - it will be you :)  

Have fun with that!
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 12:06:23 PM by rubliw »

Offline TVDOC

  • General Malcontent and
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5686
  • Reputation: +165/-3
  • Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #119 on: March 26, 2011, 12:17:39 PM »
Wilbur.....there is one huge, gaping hole in your argument when you base it on "government handouts" to hetro married couples.  These "handouts" are based in the income tax laws, and you're making the assumption that the money belongs to the government, and not the individual (or couple) to start with.  Tax laws ebb and change......there have been recent times where it was MORE expensive from a tax perspective to be married (i.e. "marriage penalty") than others.

The fundamental concept is that presently the government allows married couples to keep more of their own money, as an incentive to create and maintain nuclear families.......

Cut the crap with the "handouts" argument......it doesn't wash here.

doc
"Study the past if you wish to define the future"

Confucius

Offline rubliw

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
  • Reputation: +17/-513
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #120 on: March 26, 2011, 12:27:11 PM »
Wilbur.....there is one huge, gaping hole in your argument when you base it on "government handouts" to hetro married couples.  These "handouts" are based in the income tax laws, and you're making the assumption that the money belongs to the government, and not the individual (or couple) to start with.  Tax laws ebb and change......there have been recent times where it was MORE expensive from a tax perspective to be married (i.e. "marriage penalty") than others.

The fundamental concept is that presently the government allows married couples to keep more of their own money, as an incentive to create and maintain nuclear families.......

Cut the crap with the "handouts" argument......it doesn't wash here.

doc

So then you'll agree that same-sex marriage would not necessarily confer a financial advantage all of the time - it would change with the ebb and flow of tax laws - and is therefore is not really an issue about government handouts or entitlements as Eupher tried to suggest.

Well, on that we agree - so your post would be more aptly aimed at Eupher, not me.  
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 12:32:16 PM by rubliw »

Offline MP_Sarge

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
  • Reputation: +35/-70
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #121 on: March 26, 2011, 12:36:54 PM »
In your desperation to show me the error of my ways, you throw up your hands in disgust. Sorry -- I just don't play the PC game.

By your standards, am I supposed to fall all over myself in anger and frustration, being offended, hurt and otherwise beside myself because someone calls me a "knuckle-dragging tuba player"?
So why is the "n" word prohibited here?


Quote
Good question. In a free society, though, they should hook up with whomever they choose. But with people in your situation, why is being "married" such a big deal? Isn't making the transition to the other sex/gender/whatever the overriding concern? What is it about a piece of paper that says "Married"? Why is that so important?

This thread is about marriage.
I'm asking who transgender people should be allowed to marry, if at all.
It's relevant to the discussion, don't you think?

Quote
Well, I guess that means I'm not the boorish buffoon after all. Sex, gender, it's all the same to me. One person is born with a set of equipment just like someone else of that same gender.
Ah, so you *do* think anatomy determines gender.
So what gender are intersex people, then?
For that matter, who should intersex people be allowed to marry, if at all?
Nunquam Honorandum Nisi Merito
 Transgender American Veterans

Offline TVDOC

  • General Malcontent and
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5686
  • Reputation: +165/-3
  • Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #122 on: March 26, 2011, 12:41:42 PM »
So then you'll agree that same-sex marriage would not necessarily confer a financial advantage all of the time - it would change with the ebb and flow of tax laws - and is therefore is not really an issue about government handouts or entitlements as Eupher tried to suggest.

Well, on that we agree - so your post would be more aptly aimed at Eupher, not me.  

Actually no.....I believe that same-sex "marriage" is not a marriage at all......roughly analogous to a "marriage" between a man and a goat..  Whether or not the government in its wisdom chooses to confer favorable taxation on couples in conventional marriages is an issue of what our elected leaders foist on us.  It certainly isn't an element in any discussion to support or not support the issue.

Our government likes to use tax law to "force" behavior that they deem desireable, such as driving silly electric cars......personally, I favor a "flat", or "fair" tax system where the individual through their actions personally drives their tax liability, however I digress......

doc
"Study the past if you wish to define the future"

Confucius

Offline ChristianMIller

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 12
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #123 on: March 26, 2011, 12:43:48 PM »
"... we'll get rid of heterosexual marriage at the federal level as well, and nobody gets their cake." 

Well said. Let's get the feds out of both the marriage and civil union business. I think it is hard to justify federal involvement in marriage or civil unions on a philosophical or practical basis. I cannot see where the federal "cake" programs have improved marriages or family life over the 80 years since they started.  This federal marriage cake goes to our more affluent couples. For example, my wife does not qualify for Social Security on her own yet collects $9,000 per year from Social Security only because she is married to me. Great for us, but hardly fair to some needy elderly unmarried person who does not qualify for Social Security.

Offline MP_Sarge

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
  • Reputation: +35/-70
Re: Should same-sex marriage be legal?
« Reply #124 on: March 26, 2011, 12:46:40 PM »
If anything, government involvement has weakened the institution of marriage.

I know of many, MANY individuals who've rushed to marriage prior to a deployment, largely because of the financial incentives to do so, where otherwise they might have chosen to wait.  It's especially prevalent in the Reserve/Guard components where the person's "full-time" job offered no incentives for marriage, but upon being mobilized, there were numerous incentives.

Not to mention the many people who remain in bad relationships for fear of losing access to their own children by government order, should they divorce.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2011, 12:54:25 PM by MP_Sarge »
Nunquam Honorandum Nisi Merito
 Transgender American Veterans