Author Topic: TIME Claims Obama Exaggerating Atrocities in Libya to Justify War …  (Read 1915 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline James Cessna

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 29
  • Reputation: +10/-3
Warmonger.

Why the U.S. Went to War: Inside the White House Debate on Libya — TIME    President Barack Obama says he’s intervening to prevent atrocities in Libya. But details of behind-the-scenes debates at the White House show he’s going to war in part to rehabilitate an idea . . . the president and some of his advisers are so eager to rehabilitate the idea of preventive intervention that they’re exaggerating the violence they say they are intervening to prevent in Libya. “The effort to shoe-horn this into an imminent genocide model is strained,” says one senior administration official. That’s dangerous. Americans deserve an honest explanation when their leaders take them to war...............Obama and his aides know they are taking a big risk. “It’s a huge gamble,” says the senior administration official. The administration knows, for example, that al Qaeda, which has active cells in Libya, will try to exploit the power vacuum that will come with a weak or ousted Gaddafi.........As it turns out, Gaddafi hasn't done enough to justify humanitarian intervention—despite their rhetoric to the contrary, the administration and human rights organizations admit that reports of potential war crimes remain unconfirmed. Instead, interviews with senior administration officials show that the rehabilitators convinced Obama to go to war not just to prevent atrocities Gaddafi might (or might not) commit but also to bolster America's ability to intervene elsewhere in the future.

http://weaselzippers.us/2011/03/21/time-claims-obama-exaggerating-atrocities-in-libya-to-justify-war/



Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23556
  • Reputation: +2479/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
I doubt Obama is a warmonger. More like he's someone who doesn't want to be bothered by such nettlesome issues. All he has to do is flip the switch of the war maching to "ON", leave a note about the fact on Boehner's beer fridge as he flies out to watch parades in Brazil.

Hey the photo-ops are where the campaign commercials are cut, right?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
I doubt Obama is a warmonger. More like he's someone who doesn't want to be bothered by such nettlesome issues. All he has to do is flip the switch of the war maching to "ON", leave a note about the fact on Boehner's beer fridge as he flies out to watch parades in Brazil.

Hey the photo-ops are where the campaign commercials are cut, right?

You have to have balls to be a warmonger, that lets Obama off the hook.  He waited for the UN and other countries to lead the way.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
The subtext I'm getting is that this isn't really Obama's baby (Though of course he will get stuck with the child support for it and rep as it's baby-daddy).  It is instead the pet rock of Hillary and some of his more senior foreign policy types who see an interventionist role for us, righting social injustices in the Third World, and regard this as a test case.  Basically this is an even-more-naive and dangerous version of GWB's concept that everyone in the Dirt World wants a secular Western democracy for Christmas...or Eid-al-Futr, or whatever. 
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2648/-276
Quote
the president and some of his advisers are so eager to rehabilitate the idea of preventive intervention that they’re exaggerating the violence they say they are intervening to prevent in Libya.
Quote
Instead, interviews with senior administration officials show that the rehabilitators convinced Obama to go to war not just to prevent atrocities Gaddafi might (or might not) commit but also to bolster America's ability to intervene elsewhere in the future.

The following is PURE speculation.

This tells me something. Obama has plans for military intervention somewhere else. I can think of only one place that would entice the muslim to intervene...Israel. Obama is going to wait until the palestinians force Israel to attack them again. And he will send the military against an ally....
Obama is that evil. 

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
The following is PURE speculation.

This tells me something. Obama has plans for military intervention somewhere else. I can think of only one place that would entice the muslim to intervene...Israel. Obama is going to wait until the palestinians force Israel to attack them again. And he will send the military against an ally....
Obama is that evil. 


Quote
Statement by the President on Bombing in Jerusalem

I condemn in the strongest possible terms the bombing in Jerusalem today, as well as the rockets and mortars fired from Gaza in recent days. Together with the American people, I offer my deepest condolences for those injured or killed.   There is never any possible justification for terrorism. The United States calls on the groups responsible to end these attacks at once and we underscore that Israel, like all nations, has a right to self-defense.  We also express our deepest condolences for the deaths of Palestinian civilians in Gaza yesterday.  We stress the importance of calm and urge all parties to do everything in their power to prevent further violence and civilian casualties.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/23/statement-president-bombing-jerusalem