http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x720190
Lots of stooooopid and wrong answers. Not one suggestion that it may be that the rest of the world does not see a "world leader" in any one country now. For the first time , we have a follower in the White House.
BULLSEYE!!! Ladies and Gentlemen we have a winner! You nailed it thundley. This asshat in the White House sat on his hands and squirmed like a schoolboy just hoping the Libyan thing would blow over quickly on its own and he could then step up to the teleprompter and deliver another crafty pontificating speech. Poser.
I think we're a whole lot further away from the end of the Libyan debacle than we know at this point and that moron in the Oval Office is shitting his pants that it might go very very bad for him before it's all over. I predict he'll cut and run, dumping the mess on the French or the U.N. to save face and distance himself from it before he really gets bit. He hasn't got a clue how to lead by example.
I bring over this old T.V. spot on Ike to make the point thundley hit on, that we indeed do have a follower in the White House. America cannot afford to have a follower in the White House! It's not about Ike that I put this up here, it's about the message and that message is timeless, 1952/56 dovetails very well with 2012.
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0qAYEVOS8c[/youtube]