The WI bill is illegal, it did have a fiscal impact

[Freeper]

Put out your cigars and put the bottles of champagne back on ice.

warrior1  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Wed Mar-09-11 08:29 PM
Original message
The WI bill is illegal, it did have a fiscal impact
   
http://twitter.com/#!/markos

markos Markos Moulitsas
RT @ddayen: on page 12 of the non-fiscal bill the Senate passed, there's a supplemental funding reduction http://bit.ly/i8QC59 #wiunion

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x597983

Sonicwall  (46 posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Wed Mar-09-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So they're going to recovene the meeting without letting the Dems know
   
That's another violation of the open meetings law. There's a subsection that requires that a 12 hour notice after the first meeting ends if they want to call the same meeting....

And so far they haven't.

Well maybe if the dems weren't smoking and joking in Illinois they could have been there.

whosinpower  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Wed Mar-09-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe it is a trick to get the 14 back
   
And once back - vote on the whole thing.......

Kip Humphrey  Donating Member  (1000+ posts)  Journal  Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Wed Mar-09-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Totally agree. They don't care about legalities AT ALL. Dem Senators need to stay away!

Nevermind the 14 are shirking their duty. They were elected to be at work and fight for what their constituents believe in, not run off to a motel 6 in a nearby state.

[true_blood]

Kip Humphrey  Donating Member  (1000+ posts)    Wed Mar-09-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Totally agree. They don't care about legalities AT ALL. Dem Senators need to stay away!

Yeah,...stay classy communists. I mean democrats.

[BEG]

But I thought it wasn't about the money?  How can collective bargaining rights have a fascial impact?!?  
 






I'm being sarcastic by the way.  

[ChuckJ]

warrior1  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Wed Mar-09-11 08:29 PM
Original message
The WI bill is illegal, it did have a fiscal impact
   
http://twitter.com/#!/markos

markos Markos Moulitsas
RT @ddayen: on page 12 of the non-fiscal bill the Senate passed, there's a supplemental funding reduction http://bit.ly/i8QC59 #wiunion

I thought they just had to have a quorum if they were dealing with something that SPENDS money. Wouldn't a supplemental funding reduction be considered SAVING money and not SPENDING money?

[DumbAss Tanker]

BS.  The fact it has a fiscal impact does not make it a fiscal bill.  It's only fiscal legislation if it directly spends money or (Probably, which may vary by state) changes tax law.

[DefiantSix]

BS.  The fact it has a fiscal impact does not make it a fiscal bill.  It's only fiscal legislation if it directly spends money or (Probably, which may vary by state) changes tax law.

There you go; trying to confuse the issues/DUmbshits with facts again. 

[DumbAss Tanker]

Silly me!