Again, The Impeachment of What's His Name, Obama, Soetoro...

[FreeBorn]

Once again, much to the chagrin of the leftist media who it seems seek to cast this character (Barry) in a never ending "all is good" premanufactured Oscar role as the ultimate hero with all the answers there arises opposition to that ideal.

This question of impeachment of the current "Resident of the United States" has been bandied about before, with no shortage of public opinion supporting it yet murky waters are encountered by every official expedition which have all been scoffed at and derided, no shortage of help to thwart such efforts coming from the first mate on this pirate ship, Eric the BeHolder.

Presently though, as this current administration advances in time and continues on it's lawless track, it finds itself being called out by a Congressman from Arizona. Here we go with another one, let's hope that one of these days one of these arrows finds the mark, one that the carefully crafted and condescending armor cannot deflect.

Congressman Trent Franks (R, Arizona) Is calling out Glorious Comrade Leader on his handling (and the BeHolder's) of their contempt of the law concerning the DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act.
[youtube=425,350]_yCN93ZNJEM[/youtube]

Let's hope this gains some traction. BTW, I hadn't heard of this Gentleman from Arizona before this, check him out on his Official website, he's a keeper.



 

[TexasCop]

I'm not aware of any impeachable offenses Obama may have committed, but I'm sure when we get the Senate next year, things will be looked at a lot more closely.

[rich_t]

I'm not aware of any impeachable offenses Obama may have committed, but I'm sure when we get the Senate next year, things will be looked at a lot more closely.

I suppose that would depend on the definition of high Crimes and Misdemeanors.  I think that ordering the DoJ to NOT support the written law of the land (DOMA for instance) is a misdemeanor.  Same goes for intentionally ignoring federal court orders.

The below link is an interesting read on the topic.

http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm

The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word "high". It does not mean "more serious". It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under, and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

More at link.

[TexasCop]

It'll be interesting, for certain.  I'd personally like to see Congressional subpoenas for birth records.

[FreeBorn]

It'll be interesting, for certain.  I'd personally like to see Congressional subpoenas for birth records.

That would be a good place to start.

[DumbAss Tanker]

He could get caught eating babies on live TV and the Senate wouldn't vote for conviction on a Bill of Impeachment from the House.  MAYBE it would happen IF he were caught actually killing them himself, AND they were the children or grandchildren of three or four DemonRat Senators.  

Yes, the DemonRat Senators are such whores, though that's probably 'way too unkind to whores everywhere.