First off, I have to deduce who Tweety is. I'm assuming it's their pet name for one of the loonies on CNN or MSNBC.
Next, I think their "logic" goes like this:
1) People are rebelling against Mubaruk in Egypt;
2) Thus, Iraq war was unnecessary, because:
3) The Iraqis would have done so with Saddam Hussein
So, all countries are exactly the same as each other in the DUverse, and the fact that radical Islamists controlled by flat-out Muzzie terrorists are on a rampage in Egypt, not Jeffersonian revolutionaries, is unimportant to them.*
*Of course they are blind to the strategic value and need of the Iraq theater in the wider war against Islam. That Hussein was low-hanging fruit and next to our pretty much worst enemy after the PRC, Iran, that he was a significant state supporter of jihadist terrorism (it is pure CRAP that he didn't have multifarious ties to AQ, and anyone who thinks that Ansar-al-Islam in the north was somehow alone and unconnected to AQ is as pure ****ing idiot as there ever was), that he was always a constant threat to the Arabian peninsula and thus our supply of oil, and that we needed to, I mean HAD TO, make an example of at least one Islamic/Arab world police state after 9/11--Afghanistan was simply not enough, we needed to show that they would lose MORE than just their base, we had to show it is not safe to house AQ or any organization like AQ--none of this factors into their twisted little anti-America crumbs of brains.
