I know some one on here has to be a realtor, or stayed at a Holiday Inn once!
In the event that one is purchasing a listed house, without an agent, to whom does the buyer's commission go to or what becomes of it... seeing as their isn't one?
Here in TN...when a homeowner lists their home with a Realtor - who becomes the Seller's agent (Listing Agent), the commission is negotiated between the homeowner and the Seller's agent. No one else AT THAT TIME.
When the Seller's agent lists the property in the MLS (multiple listing service), the commission to be paid to the agent representing the buyer - the Buyer's agent - is stated at the bottom of the listing. It is not available for the public to see (in TN - don't know about other states).
If a Seller's agent is the only agent involved in the sale of said property....the agent either remains the Seller's agent or becomes a Transaction Broker. (Personally, I remain the Seller's Agent only, to avoid conflict of interest.) In this case - whether the agent is Seller's Agent or Transaction Broker - the agent retains the entire commission that was negotiated between the homeowner and the agent, at the time of listing. (exceptions to follow)
If Seller's agent remains Seller's Agent thoroughout the entire process up until they leave the closing table...the agent may give advice during any contract negotiations ONLY to the Seller.
If the agent becomes the Transaction Broker, the agent cannot give any advice to either the Seller or the Buyer, from the time the agent takes an offer on the property to the homeowner up until the time they leave the closing table. The agent MUST remain neutral.
If only one Realtor is involved in the sale of a property, the only way the commission amount will change from the time of listing to the time of closing is IF the commission to be paid to the Seller's/Listing Agent is renegotiated between the Seller and the List/Seller's Agent. This may occur in a variety of situations. The price is reduced on the property to a price that the Seller must reduce the commission percentage of the listing price in order to pay off the debt on the property at time of closing. The List Agent will reduce the commission percentage in order to keep the listing as it is expiring. The agent, at the time of taking the listing will agree to a specific commission percentage if a Buyer's Agent is involved in the sale, but a lower percentage if the the List/Seller's Agent does the whole deal. ( I have done this many times.) The Seller's Agent/Transaction Broker agrees to a lower commission percentage in order to make the deal work. (there isn't an agent out there who hasn't agreed to do this to make a deal work - unless they have only sold a couple of houses) .
A Buyer's Agent REPRESENTS the buyer at all stages of the deal...from the first time a buyer looks at a property up until the time of everyone leaves the closing table. A contract is signed between the Buyer's Agent and the buyer. We ARE not allowed to charge a buyer for our services HERE...I don't know about other states.
A Buyer's Agent is paid a percentage of the List/Seller's Agent's commission that L/SA receivea from the Seller. The percentage amount is listed on the MLS sheet. A Buyer's Agent KNOWS how much (percentage) they will be paid at the time of closing from the time they pull the mls sheet on a property. Occasionally instead of a percentage, a specific dollar amount will be listed on the mls brief. This is usually only on a very low priced property. (I have one listed this way now - my seller is paying a specific dollar amount that will be paid regardless of selling price of the property)
(List price is the amount that the property is listed for in the mls. Sales/selling/sold/closed price is the amount that is actually paid by the buyer for the property)
The Buyer's Agent never, ever discusses the amount they will be paid, with the Seller of the property. (they shouldn't discuss it with the buyer either).
It is not uncommon for both Seller's Agent and Buyer's Agent to agree to a reduced commission in order to make a deal work. Should this happen - SA and BA discuss the reduction that each will take, then the SA goes to the Seller and tells Seller that he/she will take X dollars less in commission.
As a List/Seller's Agent, I've taken less than a Buyer's Agent to make a deal work, I've taken the same amount of reduction, and as a Buyer's Agent, I've also not taken any reduction and let the Seller's Agent take it all. Every sale is different in what it takes to make it work.
I've also been in situations where the commission isn't altered during negotiations of sales price, but does get altered during home inspection negotiations.
Except of one year, I have either been on the Professional Standards - Ethics and Arbitration committee or on the Grievance Committee (works like a Grand Jury does - hears the complaint, decides whether to send it to Professional Standards or to kick it to the curb), for the last 10 years. I've been on Grievance for the last 3 years, and just started my 4th last week.
Commission arguments are frequently heard. Usually because the list agent does not double check their listings to make sure there aren't any mistakes, after it's entered into the mls. It is the list agent's responsibility to make sure that the info in the mls listing is correct...even if their assistant or secretary entered it. Any mistake falls directly on the agent. If the commission is higher than what the list agent wanted to pay (or their broker wants them to pay), an offer is written and accepted(most agents will send a dated computer printout of the listing along with the offer), and it gets to day before closing and the list agent gets the HUD statement and finds out they goofed on commission...it's oh well too bad, because Grievance will send it to PS -Arbitration and it will be ruled in the Buyer's Agent's favor. My company highly recommends that we send a specific form along with the offer that covers commission, and is signed by both Seller's Agent and Buyer's Agent, in order to prevent any surprises.
Our Board of Realty also rules that the commission amount paid by Seller's Agent to Buyer's Agent is based upon the contracted Selling Price of the property, UNLESS otherwise negotiated between the Seller's Agent and the Buyer's Agent. In other words...if anything else is included in the sales price....repairs, or more commonly closing costs for the buyer...that amount included is NOt reduced from the sales price to determine commission amount UNLESS both agents have negotiated it and agreed upon it PRIOR to the time of closing. And it must be documented.
It is important to understand .... if you, as a buyer, call up the List Agent and ask them to show you their property, and then decide you want your own Buyer's Agent, you can have one. It is YOUR choice. HOWEVER...if the List/Seller's Agent showed you the property first, the L/SA does NOT have to pay any of their commission to your Buyer's Agent -
even if you have signed a Buyer's Agency contract with the Buyer's Agent. Most agents will accept a Buyer's Agent representation, if that's the only way they will get the offer. But...there are those who won't.
If you go to an Open House, it's pretty murky. If you are asked to "sign in", it is always best to say that you already have an agent, as the L/SA could technically say that they were your first contact with a property. Which they are, unless you went previously with another agent.
I personally believe, that if a buyer wants to make sure to have someone totally representing them and only them ...
who is obligated by contract to be on their side... when purchasing a home, they should have a Buyer's Agent.
I have been a list agent for new construction(5.5yrs with the same builder/developer), and did both sides of most of the deals, but I stayed the Seller's Agent, I did not become the Transaction Broker. But new construction is different. It's usually sitting down at a table with the builder and negotiating what Buyer wants and Builder is willing to do, line by line on a construction contract.
Texacon is in a small, specialized market, and I think he told me he lives right there too. He has to walk a very fine line doing both sides and is obviously very good at it, because he gets the resells too. He's not going to do ANYTHING that could have even the slightest hint of being unethical under those circumstances (not that HE would under any circumstances). But not all agents are ethical...that's why Realtors have had such a crappy reputation. We have become much better though, at "policing" our own. Real estate laws have become much better, and as a result, contracts have become much more specific and detailed. When I started back in early '97, the main part of a real estate contract was one sheet of legal paper, full front page, and half of back side. Now ours is 10 or 11 pages, single spaced, 8.5x11 on one side!
I've worked with some real jerks over the years, both in the same office and in doing deals. There are a couple, that I hope and pray, I never have a buyer that wants one of their houses... or they have a buyer that wants one of mine...because I never want to work with them again. There's one, that my investor client will NOT have anything to do with again, to the extent that she does not even want him to show any of her houses...which puts me in a very awkward position, but I have to follow her instructions as long as they are legal. Based on our experience with the agent, I doubt the agent would even tell a buyer, about one of our listings.
I know this was a long explanation, but because the question involved commission, it's one of those that needs a detailed one, to keep me out of trouble. 