Compaq, once again I note that your tendency is to engage mouth before brain. You have a disgustingly vile habit of doing that, but I suppose it goes with the lib territory.
It's perfectly fine to insist on his being found guilty in a general court martial (do you even know what that is?) before rendering judgment, but when we're speculating like we're doing on these pages do you honestly think he's anything other than guilty?
Anyway, back to the point of the discussion.
Unfortunately, the U.S. has the history of using the U.N. - the POS bastion of anti-Americanism that it is - for its own purposes. And that is exactly what other countries use it for - not as some sort of forum to air international grievances in a diplomatic manner (this is the liberal viewpoint), but to manipulate the organization to get what they want. Any rudimentary study of organizations in general would reveal that truth.
That is why the U.N. is ineffective, wasteful, fraudulent, and fundamentally useless. Furthermore, that organization occupies valuable real estate on Manhattan that would be better used for, say, a parking garage or two.
The U.N. has no authority and no business getting involved with the WikiLeaks thing, except to duck its head under the covers so that ITS fraud and corruption isn't further exposed.
