Large talk, but that's also the kind of seriously overplaying a hand that got Clinton re-elected in 96.
I disagree. Bigtime.
The "overplaying of a hand" was because the conservatives CAVED in '95 to the democrats/socialists AND the media. The democrats caused the budget crisis, promptly blamed the republicans, knowing full well that the media would come to their aid. With this type of pressure, the republicans caved in, allowing Clinton to take the upper hand (who re-positioned himself, falsely, as a centrist), and easily beat out RINO Dole.
But we have a different paradigm. We have a president who is NOT showing ANY signs of moving to the right. In addition, the media landscape has significantly changed to the point where, for all intents and purposes, show no sign of swaying major undecideds in the near future.
Finally: I get SICK and TIRED to Congress/politics in general being refered to as a "match of wits" or any sort of game. This is not a freakin' reality show where posturing is important. THIS IS OUR COUNTRY'S STAKE IN THE BALANCE.
As far as "wet dream stuff": I really don't know how to respond, other than the fact that our biggest fear is not from the hard left's positions, but from those ostensibly on "our" side, but whose votes help the socialists more. Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, and other socialists did NOT set the stage for this country's hard position. The RINO's, more than any other group in recent history, are pragmatically more guilty, because they hide their socialist tendencies in the (R) brand.
"Large words?" Fine. I will never be a congressman. But I am probably more qualified to be one than 80% of the existing managerie.