No, it's GOOD.
Any stupid ****ing idiot who goes into a school and holds INNOCENT people hostage, in fear of their lives, doesn't deserve to be breathing the same air as us.
Stop treating this dumb ass like some kind of ****ing victim. He's not a victim. He was probably some entitled brat who thought everyone owed him something.
How would you feel if someone barged into your home/work/school/store and held YOU hostage? If you were in a store with me, Vesta, you wouldn't have to worry... because I'd kill that jackass myself. And you could start your whole little rant on me for KILLING a threat... but, hey, at least YOU would still be alive.
Evil if I were at a mall and a 3 year old or a 90 year old got ahold of a gun, I would duck and cover. Don't matter the age, if you are shot most likely you may die.
I do on occasion carry with a permit, but the important thing is to know when to use the gun and when a ball bat will stop someone. In the case of a mall, I would hope for the best and hide as a rickershay could kill an innocent by stander. Only if I could not hide or a knife were held to my chest would I consider taking a life .
Carrying is a tremendous responsibility for the person with a lethal weapon. Everything possible must be used first from throwing your shoes at the threat to stabbing them with an ink pen.
In case of a home invasion, or being grabbed in a parking lot, that is different. Got to get my mind set that the Perps are just targets at the shooting range and I could go ahead full blast..
iN THE CASE WHEN SAY THE Perp has allready killed someone and was going after someone else, depending on the people that are in the area, that is another story. I have no idea what my reaction would be in that case, I cannot imagine living out my life knowing I had killed anyone by any means, for any reason but self survival.
We react differently Evil as I am sure you know. When out of the blue people are surprised by an attack, some fight for their lives and others are so stunned they follow the orders of the attacker not wanting to get him or them even more upset. They do not fight for the reason that they feel it will make matters worse for them or family.
Rape comes to mind and how the advice for survival has changed back and forth through the years. Tricky this one.
If a women submits to the rape some courts will free the rapist as there is no signs of the victim being forced.
If a woman fights, She may end up a DOA in the city morgue.
Nothing is black or white here, in the case of the 15 year old who held people hostage, had a teacher been armed and shot him, that teacher would be in deep dodo when the boys family and a slick lawyer go them raked over the coals. A liberal court would point out that the boy had not harmed anyone and the kids he held hostage would have testified that the boy laughed and joked with them. He was a threat but NOT a direct threat and the Phyco-babble of doctors would come in and make a mess of things.
You know how Lawyers are, did the teacher know for a fact the gun was loaded, sure the boy shot into a wall but how did the teacher know the boy had more then one bullet in the gun.
Evil it seems that as we go along minding our business and are attacked and fight back, we the victims are the ones sued and behind a rock and a hard place. All kinds of weird shit comes oozing out of the closet in times when the Perps have Liberal courts.
