Author Topic: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets  (Read 1045 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cavegal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
  • Reputation: +105/-42
http://www.stripes.com/news/u-s-considering-combining-military-international-affairs-budgets-1.125839

Quote
“To advance American interests and values and to lead other nations in solving shared problems in the 21st century, we must rely on our diplomats and development experts as the first face of American power,” Clinton said in the introduction of a “consultation draft” version leaked to The Washington Post this week. “We must lead through civilian power.”
I posted this in General. It could have been Military or Economics and since Hilary is involved it could have been Terrorism.


“Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind,”  Donald J.Trump. 6/13/16

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 01:33:14 PM »
Nice way of saying, "Reduce the size of our military and piss away more money."
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2010, 02:39:44 PM »
It's a FUBAR idea, based on the delusional belief that State could find '...an army of civilian aid workers...'  willing to go in unarmed (And you can bet your ass State would insist on that) and chance getting their asses blown off, or their heads quite literally handed to them, doing the civil affairs work the Soldiers and Marines do.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2010, 02:40:37 PM »
It's a FUBAR idea, based on the delusional belief that State could find '...an army of civilian aid workers...'  willing to go in unarmed (And you can bet your ass State would insist on that) and chance getting their asses blown off, or their heads quite literally handed to them, doing the civil affairs work the Soldiers and Marines do.

They would also be union workers is my guess.

Offline ExGeeEye

  • We don't need another
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1570
  • Reputation: +236/-103
  • Spread the work ethic; the wealth will follow.
Re: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2010, 03:06:23 PM »
It's a FUBAR idea, based on the delusional belief that State could find '...an army of civilian aid workers...'  willing to go in unarmed (And you can bet your ass State would insist on that) and chance getting their asses blown off, or their heads quite literally handed to them, doing the civil affairs work the Soldiers and Marines do.

On the other hand it would be a nifty way of thinning the herd of non-warriors for a change.
My CCW permit was issued in 1791.

Charter Member: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Associate Member: Basket of Deplorables
Charter Member: Listless Vessels

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: U.S. considering combining military, international affairs budgets
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2010, 05:43:03 PM »
After all, the imposter does want to reduce the size of the military.
In this day and age, this incompentent imposter leaves us more vulnerable. :argh: