Author Topic: Chaos in the white house  (Read 8207 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 5412

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Reputation: +223/-78
Chaos in the white house
« on: October 23, 2010, 06:26:03 PM »
Hi folks,

The following is an incredible read; particularly if there is even a thread of truth in it.  It sure sounds feasible.

regards,
5412

http://theintelhub.com/2010/10/15/wayne-madsen-white-house-in-crisis/

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2010, 07:29:17 PM »
Very interesting and wheather it's true or not it certainly seems to describe Obama and his actions to a "T".

And I liked this part.

Brennan’s firm’s employees were among those cited in rifling through Obama’s State Department passport files in January 2008. It was never ascertained what information was gleaned from Obama’s files and possibly those of his mother, grandfather, and grandmother. However, WMR has learned that Obama’s past is curently of interest to individuals linked closely to the CIA.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2010, 07:45:52 PM »
Yes if there is even a tiny bit of truth to it, it's damning. And the name "Clinton" features a prominent role. That would NOT shock me.
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline 5412

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Reputation: +223/-78
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2010, 07:51:11 PM »
Yes if there is even a tiny bit of truth to it, it's damning. And the name "Clinton" features a prominent role. That would NOT shock me.

Hi,

Months ago Hillary said something and I said she was positioning herself for 2012.  Carville has also started the ball rolling subtly attacking Obama.

What I really hope happens is the Republicans force a vote to repeal health care, then Obama vetos it and then they try to over ride the veto in early 2012 so it is fresh in the minds of the voters.

That should make it tough for any democrat who is supportive of the initiative.

regards,
5412

Offline debk

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12473
  • Reputation: +467/-58
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2010, 10:23:22 PM »
wow.
Just hand over the chocolate...back away slowly...far away....and you won't get hurt....

Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.

"My therapist told me the way to achieve true inner peace is to finish what I start. So far I've finished two bags of M&M's and a chocolate cake. I feel better already." – Dave Barry

A balanced diet is chocolate in both hands.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23558
  • Reputation: +2480/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2010, 06:19:57 AM »
Who is this guy, why would government insiders leak to him and why should we believe him?

There's nothing in his bio that couldn't be said about Alex Jones.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2010, 06:48:54 AM »
You know, if this is true, he will no longer be our first black president. ....just the last in a long line of crazy white men to hold the office of president....the advantages of being half & half.

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2010, 09:11:47 AM »
One person's 'Lazy' is another person's recognition of the fact they aren't omniscient and can't stay awake 24-7-365, I don't know that I put any credence in that.  Though Obama seems to come much closer than Reagan to what a reasonable person (As opposed to a partisan or a VP waiting impatiently for his big chance) would see that way.

Absent Obama going clinically nuts in a highly visible way, like trying to use the launch codes to nuke the Midwest, I don't see that Clause 4 stuff going anywhere but around innerwebz CT circles. 

The parts about the narcissism, wanting to campaign instead of govern, and the comments on Me-shell ring pretty true, though. 
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2010, 10:52:27 AM »
^exactly my thinking after having a day to digest this.
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline 5412

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Reputation: +223/-78
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2010, 11:25:09 AM »
One person's 'Lazy' is another person's recognition of the fact they aren't omniscient and can't stay awake 24-7-365, I don't know that I put any credence in that.  Though Obama seems to come much closer than Reagan to what a reasonable person (As opposed to a partisan or a VP waiting impatiently for his big chance) would see that way.

Absent Obama going clinically nuts in a highly visible way, like trying to use the launch codes to nuke the Midwest, I don't see that Clause 4 stuff going anywhere but around innerwebz CT circles. 

The parts about the narcissism, wanting to campaign instead of govern, and the comments on Me-shell ring pretty true, though. 

Hi,

I have a friend who was at a dinner with Reagan many years ago, toward the end of his second term.  Reagan stood up and gave a toast to Margaret Thatcher, then a few minutes later stood and gave the same toast.  They joked about it saying it was because he loved her so much but my friend said that the Alzheimer's disease was indeed in full bloom.  If stuff like that did not do Reagan in, I would be inclined to agree that BO is going to finish his first term.  Only thing I can see is that the birth certificate issue could come to the forefront.

Glenn Beck was going on Friday about some sort of crisis and make sure the country, under terrible stress, does not embrace some sort of leadership that is not constitutional.  I wondered if Beck had any inside information, like the article I referenced.  Would not be too hard for the libs to try to remove Obama and grab power in the process.  Many of the scenarios in the article could lead to martial law, particularly if the blacks revolted, which in turn could cause the administration to declare martial law.....try to suspend elections, who knows what else.  When I read the article, first thing I thought about was what Beck was warning about.

His warning was a bit too ominious for me, like he knew something but could not tell.  Better check your food, water and ammunition supply just to be safe.

regards,
5412

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2010, 12:33:51 PM »
One person's 'Lazy' is another person's recognition of the fact they aren't omniscient and can't stay awake 24-7-365, I don't know that I put any credence in that.  Though Obama seems to come much closer than Reagan to what a reasonable person (As opposed to a partisan or a VP waiting impatiently for his big chance) would see that way.

Absent Obama going clinically nuts in a highly visible way, like trying to use the launch codes to nuke the Midwest, I don't see that Clause 4 stuff going anywhere but around innerwebz CT circles. 

The parts about the narcissism, wanting to campaign instead of govern, and the comments on Me-shell ring pretty true, though. 

We can hope Obama loses the codes like Clinton did for awhile.

Quote
"At one point during the Clinton administration, the codes were actually missing. That's a big deal," Shelton writes, "a gargantuan deal." Especially, he says, because the codes were unaccounted for for months. Actually, this Clinton critic told a quite similar story in his own book, seven years ago. Retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Robert Patterson was one of those men who carried the football for Clinton. He says Clinton is the someone who lost the biscuit.

Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2010/10/21/abc-notes-bill-clinton-lost-nuclear-codes-while-president-maybe-jimmy#ixzz13IaaCFpq

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2010, 12:38:49 PM »
We can hope Obama loses the codes like Clinton did for awhile.


All things considered, it's probably preferable to him actually knowing where they are.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2010, 12:40:04 PM »
All things considered, it's probably preferable to him actually knowing where they are.

He'd be the last person to use them.

Offline 5412

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Reputation: +223/-78
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #13 on: October 24, 2010, 01:40:04 PM »
He'd be the last person to use them.

Hi,

An Air Force officer who had the nuclear codes and was at Clinton's side during most of his term wrote a very damning book called "Dereliction of Duty".  If you have not read it, some of the stuff was amazing.

Living in Tampa at the time, as luck would have it, I ran into retired General Stormin Norman at the local barber shop and spoke with him for the better part of an hour.  I had just finished the book and asked him about it.  He responded that the Colonel who wrote the book was a good friend of his and it was spot on......then he concluded that if the public had any idea as to just what really went on behind the scenes they would be very unhappy.  I have the feelings that some military officer could write the sequel about Obama that would be better than the original.

I suspect someday a former military officer will enhance his retirement pay by writing such a book.

regards,
5412

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2010, 02:57:30 PM »
^Yes, none of this surpises me. Doesn't make me sleep any better though.

I'm sure every Administration has it's f*ckups. It's more troublesome though when it's an inept, liberal one.
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24114
  • Reputation: +1020/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2010, 05:42:50 PM »
Whether the source is credible or not, it is obvious that many of Obama's staff are leaving early on. I don't recall this happening before. With Bush, his staff left around the 2004 Election.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2010, 06:06:25 PM »
It's common for staff to leave if there is a second term for a president, not so common to leave after two years of the first, (and only hopefully), term.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2010, 08:18:33 PM »
WOW! it's all I can say after reading that.
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline dandi

  • Live long, and piss off liberals.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
  • Reputation: +553/-28
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2010, 11:12:49 AM »
WOW! it's all I can say after reading that.

Just remember, you heard it here first.   :-)

Quote
Which leads me to something I considered almost a year ago when the Skittle shitting ponies did not fall from the sky:  the democrats and lunatic moonbat lefties will be the ones to take Obama down. 

Whether through impeachment, birth certificate challenges that may just see the light of day in court, bombshell revelations, political defections, or outright political mutiny against their President, it's going to happen.  Yes, I know that no one wants to see a President Biden, but I do think it will look more and more palatable to the democrat "leaders" as the months grind on and more of the entrenched party elite are asked to sacrifice themselves for him.  These people care only for their power and comfort and will turn on whomever tries to take it from them. 

After all, they're entitled to it.  Just ask them.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,39542.msg429333.html#msg429333

Quote
Think about this:  Many dems fell on their swords for Clinton.  And, why not?  He was charming, likable, popular, and knew how to move towards the center when he had to.

Hussein is abrasive, popularity in free fall, and tremendously stupid.  He is, at this point, ordering them to hold hands and jump off of the cliff while san fran nan is holding a gun at their backs.

Hussein has all of the ego but none of the Clinton charm and political savvy.

While the Clintons looked to enrich themselves, they also looked out for the party.  Hussein just doesn't give a damn.  He is blatantly in your face and without a clue.  A typical Chicago street thug who doesn't care about how far down he takes the party or the country.  He will drag them all into oblivion if it means he will get a monument to himself.  And that is all this is; a monument to hussein's ego and totalitarian control.  What he's doing is telling a bunch of career politicrats that they need to make themselves a sacrifice to him.  He is being their god and telling them that committing political suicide is a great thing.

Look at all of the arm twisting and bribery that has gone on with this debacle.  He's making his appeal to them to sacrifice themselves to save his image and his presidency, no matter what is being said on tv.  It's not about the party, or the country, or the citizens, or even political rule; it's all about him.

The hard leftists don't like him because he's not hard left enough.  The centrists don't like him because he's too far left.  The blacks don't like him because he's not doing enough for them.  The unions are getting pissed off at him because card check is more or less dead and he's not moving fast enough to satisfy them.  The teachers are now getting pissed off at him because he didn't come sweeping in and save the jobs in CT.

Do you know who has been very oddly silent through all of this hell care garbage?  Hillary.  She has been going about the world, getting humiliated by damn near every "leader" she has to deal with, all in the name of hussein.  This was her signature issue, why is she so quiet?  Does anyone think she just went away after being humiliated by this rookie and the establishment DC types that she used to own?  Oh no, she is very quietly sharpening her knives and making her lists (Pelosi being at the top) and waiting for the shit-storm to finally erupt.

Remember, it was her campaign that was raising questions about his eligibility and his citizenship, not the right.  If the "I" word has been officially thrown in the media, you can bet the SOS is waiting for the right time to take out the president (hussein), the vice president (plugs), the speaker of the house (san fran nan), and the senate president pro tempore (sheets byrd).

She's next in line (http://usinfo.org/enus/go...nches/ben_succession.html) and I would be willing to bet that she is loving this mess he's creating so she can ride in and save the day.  Hillary found out the hard way that there cannot be two liberal messiahs and she was forced to take a seat.

Mark my words, when this bill and the chicanery going along with it fails (and it will), they will turn on him with a savage fury.  Not because he's hurting the country or even the party, but because he will be perceived as a complete weakling with a long trail of blood behind him in the water.  Leftists are never unified, they are a fragile coalition of egos that shatter apart when the shit really hits the fan and the time has come where the shit is hitting the fan.  Hussein is too weak to hold the coalition together like Clinton did and it will come flying apart.  The socialist devils have long memories and will not likely forget all of the ****ings they received at his hands.

I have never believed the Republicans will take down hussein, and I still don't.  If they're smart, they'll sit back and watch the show while the libs do all of the work for them.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,42003.msg459824.html#msg459824
I don't want...anybody else
When I think about me I touch myself

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #19 on: October 28, 2010, 07:45:03 PM »
This is what happens in the three ring circus, I mean, the White Mosque. It's sickening. No one is perfect, but lord zero doing what he is doing, is no mistake.  :banghead:

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2010, 10:43:45 AM »
Who is this guy, why would government insiders leak to him and why should we believe him?

There's nothing in his bio that couldn't be said about Alex Jones.

the white house mole is probably rahm emanuel.  he is a notorious leaker, and infamously self serving.  he was a poor choice as chief of staff, and the obamites are going to regret ever trusting him.

I am really enjoying that series over at newsflavor.

Offline ironhorsedriver

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 533
  • Reputation: +28/-1
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2010, 11:09:29 AM »
Even if true, the majority of Americans will never see or hear about it. The Obamaphiles won't care.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2010, 05:41:46 PM »
the white house mole is probably rahm emanuel.  he is a notorious leaker, and infamously self serving.  he was a poor choice as chief of staff, and the obamites are going to regret ever trusting him.

I am really enjoying that series over at newsflavor.
newsflavor? Do tell....
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2010, 06:05:42 PM »
newsflavor? Do tell....

read, and enjoy.  it's killer (yet very scary) stuff.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Chaos in the white house
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2010, 06:06:52 PM »
Ooooh!!!! Bookmarked!!!! :-)
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle