I'm in ur voterz booth stealin' ur elekshunz

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Mind you, if you find ANY post in the last 2 or 3 weeks that so much as hints or implies the dems may lose one or both houses of congress you will see an avalanche of condemnation. Apparently suggesting such things is a Koch Brothers RW media scheme to depress dem turn-out.

BUT...

...to suggest the election will be stolen?

Well, that whores of a different color.

tiptoe  (1000+ posts)        Mon Oct-04-10 11:16 PM
Original message
Citizens: learn about the pre-election polling scam unfolding now: 
 Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 11:32 PM by tiptoe


See: http://bit.ly/abXXCf ...Scroll down and recommend it !

The foundation is being laid for votecount fraud on election day, to be followed up by Final exit polls that are always "forced" to match the state-reported and House-clerk recorded vote-count on a lying presumption the vote count is correct.

In 2008 the consortium of new outlets FOX, AP, CNN et al suppressed the evaluation report of its own contracted exit-pollster that would have revealed -- via 51 unadjusted-state exit polls and three un-forced preliminary-national exit polls -- the truth that Obama won by 13 million more votes than the official recorded 9.5 million margin.

Read all about it, with supporting facts, at the link above -- and recommend the post so others can be prepared.

NOTE: Obama has warned numerous times that Democracy in America is threatened by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, by justices nominated by a fraudulent-elected president. That same fraud condoned torture in the name of America, war crimes in an illegal war, and the exposure of an undercover CIA operative. 80,000 New Yorkers signed a petition in 2009 for a ballot initiative to re-investigate 9-11 -- it was stifled by NY right wing trash politics. It's all tied to systemic election fraud, a sure reflection of which is found here for those with eyes to see.

Give the thread a recommendation -- a few hours left -- and tell others.

Vitamin D: A Real Missing Link-What's Safe?  The True MATH: Confirming Election Fraud
   OR VBMail+HandRecnt vs NY Lever Sys  Did Obama win by 20 million votes?
 Alert | Hide Thread | Recommend +97 votes Unrecommend

97 Wrecks so far.

This is funny:

OnTheOtherHand  (1000+ posts)        Tue Oct-05-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Obama won by 22.5 million votes, huh?
 Is that a joke that I'm just not getting?

I don't know how many people TIA thinks voted in the 2008 election, but I assume that would be at least a 15-point margin (about 17 points based on the official totals). Really?

crazyjoe (504 posts)      Tue Oct-05-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Please, TIA is a foolish embarrassment with too much time on his hands.
 Could you imagine how painful spending 10 minutes with him would be?? OH My Lord........

OnTheOtherHand  (1000+ posts)        Tue Oct-05-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. lots of recs, however
 I'm not sure why. I think that some people 'bonded' with TIA after the 2004 election, and/or feel that by reccing his stuff they are standing up against electronic voting, voter intimidation, and other election problems. If I thought that pretending to believe that Obama won by 22.5 million votes could improve elections, maybe I would consider it.

Then this scrunt shows up:

Hello_Kitty  (1000+ posts)        Tue Oct-05-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. There's no way in hell that many white people voted for Obama.
 Because believing that margin requires you to assume Obama won a sweeping majority of white voters. There's no way in hell that happened in this racist country.

 

Hm-m-m-m...our racism proves we didn't steal the election.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9254028&mesg_id=9258834

So there you have it, kids. There is no way the dems can lose next month.

But the election stands a good chance of being stolen...naturally.

[true_blood]

Hello_Kitty  (1000+ posts)        Tue Oct-05-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. There's no way in hell that many white people voted for Obama.
 Because believing that margin requires you to assume Obama won a sweeping majority of white voters. There's no way in hell that happened in this racist country.

What a FAIL post!! I bet a lot of white people voted for the imposter. I bet they are REALLY sorry that had now a days.

[JohnnyReb]

How many DUmmies does it take to count to 13 million?= 1,378,264

Some have missing fingers.

[diesel driver]

To live in a DUmmie mind must be a lonely existence.

The echos resounding withing their empty craniums must be deafening.  

[diesel driver]

How many DUmmies does it take to count to 13 million?= 1,378,264

Slightly lower in Chicago, where the dead vote.

Some have missing fingers.

All have missing brains.

[NHSparky]

What a FAIL post!! I bet a lot of white people voted for the imposter. I bet they are REALLY sorry that had now a days.

Either that of the DUmmie is one hell of a good mole.

Tell ya what, DUmmies--since you're all so mistrustful of Diebold, send me all your ATM and credit cards with the PIN numbers.  I'm sure they won't work--after all, Diebold is an EEEEEVVVVVIIILLLLL rethuglican fundie corporation.

[DefiantSix]

What a FAIL post!! I bet a lot of white people voted for the imposter. I bet they are REALLY sorry that had now a days.

It is nigh onto statistically impossible that even with 95% of the African/American vote going to Kaliph Barry, that more rassis', white-guilt ridden crackas did NOT vote for Da Rookie than black folk.

Yes people, Teh Stoopid is not limited to any particular skin color, ethnic background, gender, sexual preference or religious preference (or lack of same).

[thundley4]

Something like 91% of blacks still think Obama is doing a good job, while less than 35% of whites think so.

[Airwolf]

The gut check on November 3rd is going to be fun to watch on DU.

[Celtic Rose]

Something like 91% of blacks still think Obama is doing a good job, while less than 35% of whites think so.

That is of course a clear demonstration of white racism, while showing that blacks completely look beyond race. 

[AllosaursRus]

How many DUmmies does it take to count to 13 million?= 1,378,264

Some have missing fingers.

I was wonderin' that myself! Not only can't these people read, they can't count either!

OnTheOtherHand  (1000+ posts)        Tue Oct-05-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Obama won by 22.5 million votes, huh?
 Is that a joke that I'm just not getting?

I don't know how many people TIA thinks voted in the 2008 election, but I assume that would be at least a 15-point margin (about 17 points based on the official totals). Really?

I wonder if these dipshits took a vote today if the O'Bumbler would be elected??????

[Ralph Wiggum]

I was wonderin' that myself! Not only can't these people read, they can't count either!

I wonder if these dipshits took a vote today if the O'Bumbler would be elected??????

If it were up to the DUmmmies, Kookcinich or Feingold would have won the election as a write-in.

[miskie]

This is something I have always anticipated, and may have posted as much here at CC..

That the day polling and exit polling shows a Republican victory, TIA would abruptly change his methodology to show how the polls are wrong, and the election was stolen, whereas in the past, TIA did everything to show the polls are right, and the election was stolen.

TIA, you are a sad little dude.    

[AllosaursRus]

This is something I have always anticipated, and may have posted as much here at CC..

That the day polling and exit polling shows a Republican victory, TIA would abruptly change his methodology to show how the polls are wrong, and the election was stolen, whereas in the past, TIA did everything to show the polls are right, and the election was stolen.

TIA, you are a sad little dude.    

No, TIA is nothin' more than an asshat who thinks his ideology is the norm when it is actually just the opposite!

He refuses to see the light even though it's blinding him!

Edited for punctuation, hehehe!

[Ralph Wiggum]

This is something I have always anticipated, and may have posted as much here at CC..

That the day polling and exit polling shows a Republican victory, TIA would abruptly change his methodology to show how the polls are wrong, and the election was stolen, whereas in the past, TIA did everything to show the polls are right, and the election was stolen.

TIA, you are a sad little dude.    

Just read his forum at Progressive Independent.  His methodology is so screwed up, I can see why he thinks that every Republican dating back to Lincoln committed election fraud.

[Carl]

Just read his forum at Progressive Independent.  His methodology is so screwed up, I can see why he thinks that every Republican dating back to Lincoln committed election fraud.

I have tried to understand it several times and just get lost.
The last time I read some of the stuff it seemed that he (?) bases everything on the assumption that if someone once voted for a dem then they always will forever after so that any result that varies from that is by default fraud.

I could be wrong on that though,it is so typical DUmmy lunacy that the sane mind simply can`t follow it.

[Ralph Wiggum]

I have tried to understand it several times and just get lost.
The last time I read some of the stuff it seemed that he (?) bases everything on the assumption that if someone once voted for a dem then they always will forever after so that any result that varies from that is by default fraud.

I could be wrong on that though,it is so typical DUmmy lunacy that the sane mind simply can`t follow it.

That's part of it, one of his most basic assumptions.  The others are so convoluted I won't even bother trying to explain.  They're all over there to digest if one dares.

[Carl]

That's part of it, one of his most basic assumptions.  The others are so convoluted I won't even bother trying to explain.  They're all over there to digest if one dares.

One quick question which will maybe make it clear what he is trying to claim.
Where does he get the figure of "uncounted votes" that factor into everything he claims?

Is it just a figure he pulls out of some orifice?

[AllosaursRus]

That's part of it, one of his most basic assumptions.  The others are so convoluted I won't even bother trying to explain.  They're all over there to digest if one dares.

Only if one wants to contact food poisoning!

[Ralph Wiggum]

One quick question which will maybe make it clear what he is trying to claim.
Where does he get the figure of "uncounted votes" that factor into everything he claims?

Is it just a figure he pulls out of some orifice?

Mostly out of his ass.  It's some weighted average of "likely" voters that he weighs heavily in favor of Democrats.

[diesel driver]

Mostly out of his ass.  It's some weighted average of "likely" voters that he weighs heavily in favor of Democrats.

He has to figure in the dead vote in his ASSumptions.

[Ballygrl]

http://dummiefunnies.blogspot.com/2010/10/dummies-already-preparing-stolen.html

[diesel driver]

http://dummiefunnies.blogspot.com/2010/10/dummies-already-preparing-stolen.html

PJ Comix really knows how to stir up the DUmp, don't he!

November 3rd is gonna be SO much fun!  I feel like a kid a Christmas!  I can hardly wait!