From Skinner - Please take the 2010 Democratic Underground Member Survey

[BattleHymn]

Where's the tough questions? These are a few of the questions I'd like to see answered.

1- When did you start using illegal drugs?
2- What drugs do you use?
3- Are you now or have you ever been under the care of a psychiatrist?
4- Are you now taking  Dr. prescribed mine/mood altering drugs.
5- Do you currently have a job?
6- Have you ever held a job for more than a week?
7- Are you on welfare?
8- Are you on disability?
9- Do you receive foodstamps?
10- Do you benefit from other private charities?
11- Is your rent government subsidized?
12- How many abortions have you had?
13- What sex are you?
14- What race are you?

#13 is going to be tough for the primitives.  A simple 'M' or 'F' doesn't suffice for the creatures at the DUmp. 

You need something akin to the number of letters in a can of alphabet soup to fully express what they purport themselves to be:

LGBTSGYWEROIULKJWTFBBQWAFFLEOIUOQOWE

[miskie]

Well I took the survey this morning and got the boot this morning. Coincidence? Maybe. Doubtful.

Indeed- between the evidence you present, and my own experience with webhosting, I feel the best way to take this survey is not at all.

[Ballygrl]

I'm not into computer-speak LOL and I'm not registered over there so I can't take the survey, but what is it that people think this survey is revealing about people other than their answers?

Thanks!

[soleil]

I'm not into computer-speak LOL and I'm not registered over there so I can't take the survey, but what is it that people think this survey is revealing about people other than their answers?

Thanks!

Probably the 200 words or less comment section. People will probably use that to sound off.

[Ballygrl]

Probably the 200 words or less comment section. People will probably use that to sound off.

Oh OK, it's kind of deceptive though to put up a survey and than people are going to be booted because they're being honest.

[soleil]

Oh OK, it's kind of deceptive though to put up a survey and than people are going to be booted because they're being honest.

Sure it is. I think he's using it to get the people out that gives him headaches and don't worship him.

[Carl]

Oh OK, it's kind of deceptive though to put up a survey and than people are going to be booted because they're being honest.

It wouldn`t be the first time at the DUmp,they are petty and cowards.

[dutch508]

I would advise any mole that takes it, Wait a few days before reporting anything. If there are just a few who have filled out the survey at the time of the post, it makes it easier for Skins & co. to identify you.

 This is a huGH1!!1 mole trap.   Scammer is trying out his new purity test plan.

[Duke Nukum]

So after this survey, how many prims will remain?  10? 20?

[Chris_]

So after this survey, how many prims will remain?  10? 20?

The ones that still have cash to donate.

[Chris_]

Sure it is. I think he's using it to get the people out that gives him headaches and don't worship him.

I wonder if it had something to do with your little stalker buddy.

[soleil]

I wonder if it had something to do with your little stalker buddy.

I see that person has somewhat stayed away. Hahaha! It may. I am sure there were many PMs to Skinner about me posting here. So me posting here along with the survey got me the pizza. He's banned people for far less. And some of those were big donors. But Will Pitt who threatened death on someone came back. You see the consistency here? Me either. There is none.

[TVDOC]

I see that person has somewhat stayed away. Hahaha! It may. I am sure there were many PMs to Skinner about me posting here. So me posting here along with the survey got me the pizza. He's banned people for far less. And some of those were big donors. But Will Pitt who threatened death on someone came back. You see the consistency here? Me either. There is none.

Err......he/she/it received the CC equivalent of a "pizza".....

doc

[soleil]

Err......he/she/it received the CC equivalent of a "pizza".....

doc

How did I miss that? Well no wonder they've stopped stalking me! hahaha!! Awesome!

[Doc]

How did I miss that? Well no wonder they've stopped stalking me! hahaha!! Awesome!

That event may have been what provoked you getting dumped from the DUmp.......however, I'm more inclined to believe that it was how you answered Skinner's "anonymous" questionaire......

He/she/it was warned.....

doc

[miskie]

How did I miss that? Well no wonder they've stopped stalking me! hahaha!! Awesome!

'Pizzas' aren't delivered here all that often, but when they are, rest assured dey be deeee-licious. 

[soleil]

'Pizzas' aren't delivered here all that often, but when they are, rest assured dey be deeee-licious. 

They could've been more clever with their name, and maybe no one would've known. I agree with doc that it may have been part of the reason for my DU banning. That and that lovely survey. But I am with you, I thought I'd have been banned sooner.

[Doc]

'Pizzas' aren't delivered here all that often, but when they are, rest assured dey be deeee-licious.  

Now that you bring it up miskie, I'm not sure you could PAY me to be a moderator at the DUmp........the number of deleted posts, banned members, locked threads, etc. is astronomical considering the number of posters that they have........just kinda reinforces our position on the "quality" of the membership.

I've been a mod here for close to a year, and had ban capabilities for half that as a global mod, and I think I've used it twice.......I can count on one hand the number of threads that I've locked, I would guess the most frequent action for all of the staff here is merging duplicate threads, and moving them from one forum to another.......the membership should really give a "hat tip" to the Admins, as much goes on behind the scenes, as many trolls and spammers are intercepted before they ever post anything.

In the case of an existing member, there is a great deal of deliberation involving all of the staff before a "pizza" is delivered, it is not a decision that is arrived at without significant discussion and consideration.

doc