It didn't get there all by itself. No wonder these people want graphic sex ed started in kindergarten..... they're still confused as adults.
I've always wondered how these libs, who want the laws re-written to absolve us all of any personal responsibility for our actions, who want to wipe away any possibility of consequences, have overlooked the baby daddy in the scheme of things. Just wait until one of their precious liberal male offspring knocks up the daughter of a bible-thumping anti-abortion family. Then, all of a sudden, they'll be legislating abortion rights for men.
This is a problem that I have struggled with for years.
It seems that a woman who is pregnant is just as responsible as the sperm Donner.
So why does the woman have the right to kill the baby and the father have no say. Say the father wants his child, he stated the process, why is he now considered not the parent of said child until it is born.?
To me when a woman becomes pregnant and the child begins to grow, that child is not any way or form a perment part of a woman's body. The baby who has a heart beat and a forming brain is now using the woman's body to grow.
Too bad for the woman, their body's are just doing what they are suppose to do. Anyone with a problem with woman complaining about this need to take that up with GOD.
Lots of scenarios here, you have a daughter that has spent thousands of dollars to become pregnant--finally she conceives and for a few months is wildly excited----then she miss carries.
On the other hand you have a son who wants to become a father, he is excited to find he will become a Dad, then finds the mother of his child has aborted his child.
My question is when do both parents parents of a fetus gain the rights as a parent.?
If Men have no rights to their child before birth, why do they find themselves responsible after birth.??
And another question, why do insurence companys cover the wifes pregnancy on their coverage if the insurer has no say about in the life or death of their child???
