DoJ: Sue Sanctuary Cities? That's Just Crazy Talk!

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

The Obama administration said this week that there is no reason to sue so-called sanctuary cities for refusing to cooperate with federal authorities, whereas Arizona's new immigration law was singled out because it "actively interferes" with enforcement.

"There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law," Tracy Schmaler, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., told The Washington Times. "That's what Arizona did in this case."

You're a bullshit ****ing lying pig-faced backstabbing commie shit nozzle leprous whore bag of a piss-guzzling pustulous, anal lesion reeking of boiled hot dogs and shame.

But I digress...

But the author of the 1996 federal law that requires states and localities to cooperate says the administration is misreading it, and says drawing a distinction between sanctuary cities and Arizona is "flimsy justification" for suing the state.

"For the Justice Department to suggest that they won't take action against those who passively violate the law --who fail to comply with the law -- is absurd," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee and chief author of the 1996 immigration law. "Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/14/justice-sanctuary-cities-are-no-arizona/

This admin just insulted the intelligence of 74% of the American people...and yet the MSM can't seem to hedge its own economic interests and call the president out on such lies.

[JohnnyReb]

You're a bullshit ****ing lying pig-faced backstabbing commie shit nozzle leprous whore bag of a piss-guzzling pustulous, anal lesion reeking of boiled hot dogs and shame.

Does that mean that in a pinch and with enough bags you'd still do her?

[IassaFTots]

Does that mean that in a pinch and with enough bags you'd still do her?

 

 

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Does that mean that in a pinch and with enough bags you'd still do her?

That depends.

How much liquor is in the bags?

Are we talking Phyllis Diller quantities or just IassaFTots levels of intoxication?

[IassaFTots]

That depends.

How much liquor is in the bags?

Are we talking Phyllis Diller quantities or just IassaFTots levels of intoxication?

I am no Phyllis Diller, but I can hold my own.   

[JohnnyReb]

That depends.

How much liquor is in the bags?

Are we talking Phyllis Diller quantities or just IassaFTots levels of intoxication?

Two qts. of grain alcohol...one for consumption and one to swab her down with.

[PatriotGame]

Two qts. of grain alcohol...one for consumption and one to swab her down with.

OUCH!

That be some phunny shit right there!

Sorry Iassa...that bee phunny!

[JohnnyReb]

OUCH!

That be some phunny shit right there!

Sorry Iassa...that bee phunny!

I was talking about the DUmmie....Iassa, meanwhile, wouldn't require any alcohol...but a glass of wine might be nice.