For 'leaders' that are supposedly so sooper-intelligent, they certainly seem to be cagey about producing their old grades or academic work to back it up, which tends to indicate they are just damned liars and everyone who buys it is a complete dupe and tool.
The Democrat sooper-genius club actually demonstrates a surprising lack of substance, even a refusal to own up to their own work, and it has come up with every contender they've had from the 2000 election to date - Gore (Failure as a student), Kerry (Actually grades about the same as W's, if not slightly worse), Hillary (So what was your dissertation about again?), and of course the Big Zero (How the F do you become president of your law school's Law Review without ever writing anything good enough to get published in it??? W.T.F.??? Apparently you can do this at Harvard if you are a member of a fashionable minority, well-heeled, and liberally share your drugs, because it seems they do it by election instead of having any outmoded, elitist 'merit-based' considerations involved).
