Author Topic: Former White House Speechwriter Suggests Military Coup Could Oust Obama  (Read 2318 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cavegal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
  • Reputation: +105/-42
http://www.infowars.com/former-white-house-speechwriter-suggests-military-coup-could-oust-obama/ 

Quote
Former White House speechwriter John L. Perry has courted controversy by suggesting that the U.S. Military, upholding their oath to defend the Constitution against domestic enemies, could stage a bloodless coup to oust President Obama.

In an article originally posted on the Newsmax website, Perry wrote, “There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.”

Despite the fact that Perry was not explicitly advocating such a coup, Newsmax later removed the article to ensure it “was not misinterpreted”.

The article outlines how military officers, outraged at Obama’s “trampling” on the Constitution, nationalization of American institutions, rising deficits, unemployment and taxes, could peaceably seize power from the “radical-left commissars” of the Obama administration.

“Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible,” writes Perry.

It is important to stress that Perry is not a Neo-Con, he worked under the Democratic administrations of Lyndon Johnson and Jim


“Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind,”  Donald J.Trump. 6/13/16

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Writing books and movies about assassinating GW Bush was just fine though.

Offline Freeper

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Writing books and movies about assassinating GW Bush was just fine though.

Hell how many times did DU openly call for the soldiers to revolt?
That's right on a daily basis.


I'll give you a hint of who had that banner it wasn't the tea party.


I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23558
  • Reputation: +2480/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
DU is having a shit-fit over this.

They want NewsMax and the author tried and hung for sedition...but not necessarily in that order.

BTW - WTF is up with pulling shit from infowars?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
PrisonPlanet was busy :whistling:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23558
  • Reputation: +2480/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
PrisonPlanet was busy :whistling:
I long for the day Alex Jones is shown to be in a gay tryst with Lyndon laRouche.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
I googled his name to find the article, as I am curious what the hell he actually wrote.   This came up:

http://www.libertarianleanings.com/2009/10/so-who-is-john-l-perry.html

Note the date on this is 10/09.   It's May, 2010.   Really?

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Ridiculous.  If becoming 'more likely' means it gained some exponentially small fragment of a percent in probability maybe, but the net probability would still be down in the triple-Powerball-winner odds territory.

Congress, not the President, passes the laws, so why would the President himself be held accountable in that drastic a way in the first place?  The day of reckoning will come in due course in the manner made and provided by the Constitution, in November 2012.  He's done nothing that would even have a remote chance of bringing this incredibly-irresponsible idea into play.   
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Thanks, DAT.  The story, hell, the very concept of a coup in America even with what is going on now, is proof positive that not all batshit crazy nutjobs are confined to the left.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15

Note the date on this is 10/09.   It's May, 2010.   Really?

Yes, thats about the right time frame

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23558
  • Reputation: +2480/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Congress, not the President, passes the laws, so why would the President himself be held accountable in that drastic a way in the first place? 

We can throw them out too.

 :-)
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."