11 Boo must have watched "Hamburger Hill" again

[Carl]

There's not going to be any general armed uprising in this country as long as there's an intact Constitution and a functioning ballot box. Obama has done a lot of things to piss off conservatives but unless there's mass starvation or a suspension of rights no significant group of people are going to take up arms against a duly elected leader. Perhaps the occasional lone nut or small group like we've seen throughout history will act up, but that's about it. The Tea Party and associated groups are about asserting rights and showing solidarity. Their bearing arms is nothing more than that same assertion of the Second Ammendment. Liberals have never seen activism by conservatives on such a scale and it has them scared shitless that the silent majority is silent no longer. They've found out that mass demonstration is no longer their sole province. This has thoroughly flustered them. How dare we speak up!

All this talk of widespread violence is nothing but a wet dream on the part of liberals who would like nothing better than to see their opponents shot down like dogs. We know this is their mindset. We've witnessed it a thousand times as they celebrate the deaths of conservative figures and root against our troops under fire. Being the craven cowards they are, they could never hope to do it themselves so they are left to fantasize about their ultimate hero, Big Government, doing it.

As DAT pointed out, by the time conditions degenerated to the point where we're facing armed insurrection, the military itself would face a schism. Even if it wasn't in disarray at the time, the spectre of firing on their own countrymen, which may include their own fathers, sons, brothers, or creating collateral damage which could injure or kill any one of their families, would certainly cause such a rift. DUmmies are so caught up in their own stereotyping of the military that they actually believe they would mindlessly and joyously proceed in dealing death to anyone, even their loved ones, in the name of the Constitution. In reality it is nothing more than a reflection of their own nihilistic world view.

Just damn....you always sum things up perfectly.

[diesel driver]

1 Bravo  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Apr-19-10 06:18 PM
Original message
A little heads up for the Teabagger/Militia folks from one who once packed heat for Uncle Sam.
  
If you seriously believe that you are capable of going up against the United States government, I would urge you to put your affairs in order, because you will be swiftly and efficiently fragged, tagged, and bagged. The idea that a bunch of rag-tag, candy-ass, drunks believe they could stand up against even a platoon, let alone the full force of the US military is hysterically funny. You have no idea how stupid you appear, prancing through the woods in your cammo, to individuals who have seen real combat. Deal with it, ass-holes. The C-in-C is an African-American. He was democratically elected (in a landslide). All the rest of your whining is bullshit, and you lack even the rudimentary courage to state your true objection to our President.
**** it, I haven't worn a green suit for almost 40 years, but I just might re-up for a chance to put one in the ten ring of a few of you jackasses.

I recall a certain Army General thinking and saying the same things one time in Montana, about 125 years ago....

I believe his name was Custer, and it was near the Little Bighorn River where he was heard muttering these famous words:  "WHERE IN THE HELL DID ALL THESE INDIANS COME FROM?"  

[NHSparky]

Of course, in DUmpland, Stolen Valor is to be applauded and revered, not punished.

[Tucker]

That camp fire has burned out of control since this morning.

11 Bravo  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Apr-19-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. 60 in January. And yeah, A Shau Valley, 70-71.

pinboy3niner  Donating Member  (376 posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue Apr-20-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
113. Gotta be 101st, right?
   
Me, '69-'70, 2/501

Aristus  Donating Member  (1000+ posts)  Journal  Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Apr-19-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. Count me in with you, 11 Bang! Listen up, teabaggers. Former 19Kilo here!
   
Take up arms against MY country, and I'll go to President Obama that very day, and volunteer to saddle up in one of these:

Pic of M1A1Abrams.

...and come after your fat, drunken asses!

America! Love it or f*****g LEAVE it!

Go to Somalia, where they don't have taxes or government!

Stay the hell out of my country!

hvn_nbr_2  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Apr-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Hey, quit picking on Walter Mitty! nt

I used this name earlier up thread. We've had visitors. Hey DUmmy's.

progressoid  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Apr-19-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yep. But I don't think they read websites like this.
   
K/R anyway

Oh yes we do.

Fumesucker  Donating Member  (1000+ posts)  Journal  Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue Apr-20-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #114
119. Now who is wishing for violence?
   
The kids shot at Kent State were unarmed, there is a difference between protest and armed insurrection.

Here is the mentality we are dealing with ..

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,982270...

(Rush Limbaugh) says. "I tell people don't kill all the liberals, leave enough around so we can have two on every campus; living fossils, so we will never forget what these people stood for."

 

cherokeeprogressive  Donating Member  (1000+ posts)  Journal  Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue Apr-20-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
132. The thought of you fraggin', baggin', and taggin' after re-upping to shoot Americans in their
   
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 01:16 PM by cherokeeprogressive
ten ring was funny yesterday. I pictured a 60 year old limping around tossing grenades and shooting at imaginary enemies while screaming "ya want some? come GET some!". Laughed... thought I'd die.

Today after reading the replies of those who cheer the notion of shooting other Americans? Well, not so much.

This Veteran thinks you're an ass for posting such tripe.

Dirty stinking freeper mole.

mwrguy  (96 posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue Apr-20-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
144. OP should sponsor a militia gathering
   
Get them all in one spot, then BOOM!

We'll see how well a bunch of fat rednecks with rifles do against air strikes and artillery.

spin  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue Apr-20-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #144
149. Your post is so disgusting that it doesn't deserve a reply ...
   
I don't support tea baggers or militia movements but the idea of sponsoring a gathering of U.S. citizens and then killing them with air strikes and artillery smells of Hitler's Germany.

Would the members of the military who perform the attacks also wear an emblem with two white oblique Sig Runes on black like the SS?

The worm has turned against the cellar dwellers.

[Karin]

Yes, what an interesting thread.  It begins with blood-thirsty fantasies of power and glory and a whoooole lot of testosterone.  It feeds the other impotent DUmmies and they boil to a froth of weaponry, superior firepower, and masculine conquest.   It simmers, and stinks up the place so bad that the peacenik nannies have to come in and scold, and make them sit in their corners, presumably with duncecaps on. 

[JohnnyReb]

Yes, what an interesting thread.  It begins with blood-thirsty fantasies of power and glory and a whoooole lot of testosterone.  It feeds the other impotent DUmmies and they boil to a froth of weaponry, superior firepower, and masculine conquest.   It simmers, and stinks up the place so bad that the peacenik nannies have to come in and scold, and make them sit in their corners, presumably with duncecaps on. 

Yes, but it's all "virtual testosterone".

[BlueStateSaint]

Yes, but it's all "virtual testosterone".

Kinda like "healing white light."

[NHSparky]

Maybe if they all showed us pictures of their hands we would all see the error of our ways, and fall in behind Dear Leader like good dutiful liberal sheeple.

[DumbAss Tanker]

I do have to give some props to the Nanny-DUers scolding all the TiTs-in-Traing (TiTiTs, for short), no matter how bizarre their view of the world may be, they are at least being internally consistent about it.

[Karin]

This is a little long, but worth reading, I think.  Cherokee & the OP got into it:

cherokeeprogressive  (1000+ posts)        Tue Apr-20-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #173
178. Of which "threats" do you speak?
 Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 11:21 PM by cherokeeprogressive
Are you saying that there have been OVERT threats that armed insurrection will be used against the United States government? Really? Since you made the claim, could you point me to a single instance of such a threat? And don't tell me to read anything into the words they use. I'm talking about a real language threat. Individuals threatening armed insurrection against the legitimate government of the United States should be... arrested or at the very least questioned. That's what they should be. Until the first shot is fired, it's merely a law enforcement issue.

I'm actually surprised that a combat hardened individual such as yourself would get in such a tiff over a bunch of rag-tag, candy-ass drunks, prancing through the woods in their camo, who could be squashed by a single platoon. I don't know... maybe you figured some tough talk from a combat hardened soldier was what was needed in this instance and would set the whole situation to right. You sure are putting a lot of stock in something I find to be more of a nuisance than anything else though.

In spite of all your bluster, the situation is thus: Until a shot is fired, they are nothing more than American citizens with a different opinion than ours. Until a shot is fired, no fragging, tagging, or bagging is warranted. No treason or sedition has occurred. No one has broken any law that hasn't been held accountable for breaking said law. None of you Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, or Marines who haven't put on a uniform in nearly four decades need to worry about re-upping in an effort to save the Republic from a bunch of rag-tag, candy-assed drunks who prance through the woods in their camo, and could be squashed by a single platoon. In fact, there isn't even reason to go to the range and practice putting rounds in the ten ring because these fools pose no real danger other than shooting themselves in the foot or accidentally hitting an innocent person with a stray bullet due to their relative inexperience with firearms compared to the likes of you. And THAT, my friend, is nothing more than a law enforcement issue. I recited the same ****ing oath you did, and in the case you outlined, I don't believe fragging, bagging, tagging, and putting rounds into the ten rings of American citizens is warranted.

The boogeymen will not hurt you. Barack Obama is every Americans president. My sweaty fantasies do not involve things like combat, fragging, bagging and tagging, or rounds in ten rings. Those statements are all true. Accept them.

This is the last word so far:

PavePusher (1000+ posts)      Tue Apr-20-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
179. The openly displayed bigotry and rage in this thread...
 dwarfs anything I've seen at Tea Party rallies.

Pretty ****ing disgusting coming from the party that claims to be more enlightened and inclusive than the opposition.

I am ashamed for all of us.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Ya know...

..I wish to recall to everyone's memory how these liberal jack-holes preened and whined that jihadists could not be beaten. They crowed for years on end that guerilla wars cannot be wone. Ideological foes, we were told, we far too motivated and that their primitive means of conducting warfare made them too nimble and evasive for a set-piece military to engage.

We were told--with subdued tones of triumphalism--that the US military could never beat such an enemy. We were throwing away the lives of young men and women in Iraq and Asscrackistan. Hajji had us dead to rights and the war would take too long to endure the waning willpower of the American people (no mention of the fact that the treasonous hippy shitbags did everything they could to sap that will).

Now, suddenly the US military is hyper-cometent and capable of swiftly ending these rogue ideologue elements.

Nevermind the fact that your average Tea Partier is a helluva lot better armed and educated than hajji ever hopes to be.

Nevermind the fact that sprawling America ain't the confined, sparse terrain of Iraq.

Nevermind te fact that the military has a lot more in common with the TP than shitbag traitorous hippies who call them mind-numbed, incompetent, occupying war criminals.

Straighten out your memes you assholes.   

[TheSarge]

Ya know...

..I wish to recall to everyone's memory how these liberal jack-holes preened and whined that jihadists could not be beaten. They crowed for years on end that guerilla wars cannot be wone. Ideological foes, we were told, we far too motivated and that their primitive means of conducting warfare made them too nimble and evasive for a set-piece military to engage.

We were told--with subdued tones of triumphalism--that the US military could never beat such an enemy. We were throwing away the lives of young men and women in Iraq and Asscrackistan. Hajji had us dead to rights and the war would take too long to endure the waning willpower of the American people (no mention of the fact that the treasonous hippy shitbags did everything they could to sap that will).

Now, suddenly the US military is hyper-cometent and capable of swiftly ending these rogue ideologue elements.

Nevermind the fact that your average Tea Partier is a helluva lot better armed and educated than hajji ever hopes to be.

Nevermind the fact that sprawling America ain't the confined, sparse terrain of Iraq.

Nevermind te fact that the military has a lot more in common with the TP than shitbag traitorous hippies who call them mind-numbed, incompetent, occupying war criminals.

Straighten out your memes you assholes.