The BarackStar!'s spiritual guide for 20 years . . . . this is better than the embarrassing nutty relatives of candidates (billy carter comes to mind); you can't choose your relatives, and everyone has a nutty uncle or two. but you choose your paster, and you choose your church.
The veneer is starting to come off the Senator and the moonbat underneath is starting to be shown. 
there was about an 8 point swing in the tracking polls over this. this is why, of course, you don't nominate a guy for president of the united states that is totally unknown and unvetted in a national election. the dems never learn; they did this with clinton. governor of a little southern state, and no one knew anything about him other than he gave this speech at the convention one year . . . . and look what they got.
It is the same reason they turned to Sen.Kerry 4 years ago.
They thought he was able to deflect the fact that they are soft on our nations defense and that they didn`t take the WOT seriously.
They never checked or they would have seen his tale was nothing but lies and misrepresentations.
It is the price to pay for being arrogant.
I think they had the right impulse in 2004, but the wrong execution. I think they said to themselves, "OMG, we are about to nominate a lunatic for president", and reflexively (and rather frantically) began to search for someone "electable". that's a bit of a twisted notion. ultimately, they nominated someone that really wasn't anyone's #1 candidate, but everyone thought would be liked by everyone else. what they got was an inoffensive corpse and his drunk wife.
kerry just made it worse when he nominated the sparkling and lively (although thoroughly brain dead) john edwards as his running mate.