Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
marmar (1000+ posts) Tue Feb-09-10 01:07 PMOriginal messageThis is why you can't negotiate with terrorists..... from OpenLeft:As condition for participation in summit, Republicans demand summit be scrapped by: Chris Bowers Tue Feb 09, 2010 at 12:53 I have learned, in background discussions with Republican leaders, of additional demands they have made to President Obama on the proposed health care summit. While these demands were later removed from the letter they eventually sent to President Obama, I have been able to reconstruct them here: 1. The bipartisan health care summit must be scrapped in order to secure Republican participation in the summit. 2. The elimination from public instruction in Serbia, both as regards the teaching body and the methods of instruction, all that serves or might serve to foment the propaganda against Austria-Hungary. 3. A bowl of M&M candies, with all the brown M&M's removed, should be placed in the Republican dressing room. 4. Leia and the Wookiee must never again leave this city.Snark aside, here are the actual absurd demands: 1. Scrap the House and Senate health care bills 2. Never use budget reconciliation for health care 3. Post all ideas he will propose at the summit online 72 hours before the summit 4. Invite Democrats who opposed the bill to the summit 5. Invite state legislators who oppose the bill to the summit 6. Invite actuaries from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7. Invite members from the Congressional Budget Office 8. Allow Republicans to invite an unspecified list of other health care experts. 9. Invite labor leaders only on the condition that you call their participation in the process "sweetheart deals." 10. Broadcast on television all discussions President Obama has on health care with anyone ever.The letter also contains lots of bold face type. As we all know, if it isn't in bold face, you don't really mean it. http://www.openleft.com/diary/17302/as-condition-for-pa...
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Tue Feb-09-10 01:10 PMResponse to Original message1. Who the **** do they think they are? n/t
jobycom (1000+ posts) Tue Feb-09-10 01:10 PMResponse to Original message2. Bold face type is for when regular whining isn't strong enough. Or for when they want to lie more emphatically.
OK, I give up...what's so objectionable?
Looks like a fine list to me, nothing absurd about it. They need to be very very careful here.