The Conservative Cave
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Send Us Hatemail !
mailbag@conservativecave.com
Home
Help
Login
Register
The Conservative Cave
»
Current Events
»
General Discussion
(Moderators:
Carl
,
SSG Snuggle Bunny
,
bijou
) »
CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision (Read 1105 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Village Idiot
Banned
Probationary (Probie)
Posts: 54
Reputation: +96/-15
CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision
«
on:
January 23, 2010, 05:00:26 PM »
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeGlzEavpTM[/youtube]
Watch the Video
Logged
rich_t
Hero Member
Posts: 7942
Reputation: +386/-429
TANSTAAFL
Re: CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision
«
Reply #1 on:
January 23, 2010, 10:25:13 PM »
Excellent video.
Logged
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944
Randy
Resident Grouch with a
Hero Member
Posts: 4244
Reputation: +202/-39
Odd
Re: CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision
«
Reply #2 on:
January 24, 2010, 08:49:33 AM »
So if DU advocated a candidate and actively solicited campaign contributions for candidates then DU should have been shut down.
I think the FEC owes us a retroactive DU shutdown.
Logged
', 4, '
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y4/Randomluck/BurningMan_av.gif
longview
Hero Member
Posts: 3292
Reputation: +224/-34
Re: CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision
«
Reply #3 on:
January 24, 2010, 09:14:48 AM »
Interesting. Thanks for posting that.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
The Conservative Cave
»
Current Events
»
General Discussion
(Moderators:
Carl
,
SSG Snuggle Bunny
,
bijou
) »
CATO: Video explains case in SCOTUS decision