Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-23-10 02:00 PMOriginal messageHow about this for a Corporation? Updated at 2:00 PM Let's call it Progressive Resources, Inc. It's not a non-profit. It sells a product...just one product, a bumper sticker saying "Progressive Resources Supports Progressives." Each bumper sticker costs $100. That $100 also gets you one share of the corporation and entitles you to vote on the corporation's policies.All proceeds from sales of Progressive Resources products, after any applicable taxes, will be used to buy television time to campaign for progressive candidates for public office, particularly in places where they stand a decent chance of winning the election. Candidates to be supported will be chosen in elections, based on votes of the corporation's shareholders in elections held online.Many other such corporations could also be created. If they're going to allow corporations to spend as much money as they want on campaign ads, then let's form corporations with that as their sole purpose. To avoid conflicts with regulations on non-profits, each can sell a product for a price that far, far, exceeds the cost of the product, along with a share in the corporation.What we cannot change, we should use to advance our own goals. Seems simple enough to me.
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-23-10 02:12 PMResponse to Reply #36. I prefer direct, undiluted advertising over diluted Updated at 2:00 PM influence. Let's say that the corporation I propose sells 10,000 bumper stickers. That provides $1 million to work with. In a Congressional District race, that's a substantial amount of money. And, there are no non-profit rules to follow.
Pure genius, primitives. Do it.
This is their stupidest idea yetAside: Who would have thunk that the week surrounding The One's 1st year anniversary as President would have all of the primitives in a tailspin ?
Liberals rich enough to afford $100 for a bumper sticker don't buy bumper stickers. Liberals who do buy bumper stickers cannot afford $100 for a bumper sticker.
Heck if it worked, we'd just copy it
MineralManHow about this for a Corporation? Let's call it Progressive Resources, Inc. It's not a non-profit. It sells a product...just one product, a bumper sticker
Well, I sorta did. I don't know where to find it, but about this time last year I posted about how by the same time in 2010, the Little Goons and democrats and all those types would be in a reality meltdown.
Here's what got me:Why sell anything? You don't have to have a product or service in order to be incorporated. Just set up a corp, sell shares, and everything's an expense. Nothing in a corp says you have to try and make money. The gov't just says if you want to be incorporated, here's how you go about it. It doesn't say you have to be any good at it.
FGL Inc, LLC: could it 'own' a blogspot blog or does blogspot own it? Just wondering... heh