How do these Global Warming Cultists explain or compensate for the fact that small fluctuations in the atmosphere can equal human CO2 output?
These alleged scientists know that the balance between the surface and the atmosphere aren't in natural balance and never have been.
Yet they act as if the imbalance only started in the last 100-150 years.
I don't mind playing Devil's advocate (in fact he keeps me on retainer) but you bring out a point I don't think feather-head recognizes:
The graph he is so eager to show has carbon and temp rising and falling over periods of hundreds and thousands of years. I'm sure he would love to show a spike since the advent of the industrial age but such spikes have been obliterated with the CRU emails and subsequent revisiting of so-called data which is no data at all. Bad models filled with bad data is no basis for research.
It's certainly nothing to lose your freedom or economy over.
Still, it is hard to analyze without psycho-analyzing. To justify the degree of intrusion they claim is necessary to rectify this "issue" one has to have a potential threat. They are essentially asking to co-opt liberty and economic power on a scale not seen since WW2 where we had rationing and a suspension of 4th Amendment liberties (they were reading people's mail). In a total war I can sincerely defend such actions but now, instead of fighting Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan, the chimera we battle is...us, our very own way of life.
Can man be destructive? Hell yes! But does the history of Love Canal, Chernobyl et al prove or justify AGW? Hell, no! And the incestuous tricksters from CRU, the IPCC and stealclimate.borg don't have the facts otherwise they wouldn't have to resort to lies. I think people like the head of the IPCC are in it for the money because he's making money. Al Gore might actually believe his bullshit but his oversized back pocket and elitist attitude do nothing to help. The Nobel Committee beclowns itself giving the Peace Prize to a report now proven to be packed with fabricated data, bad models and politically motivated non-research. Which brings us to the IPCC.
heh.
'nuff said.
I don't know if TNO psychologically NEEDS windmills to tilt but the absence of doom and gloom seems to distress him to no end. It is as if he was in mourning after being told his child was misdiagnosed with cancer. Perhaps it is because the doctor offering the second opinion is politically misaligned he demands the child be subjected to the whithering effects of radiation and chemo therapy, "just to be safe" and then runs off to have a fund-raiser and place a third mortgage on his multi-generational home to pay for the treatments with the doctor that provided the first diagnosis who forbids a re-examination of test findings.
The entire affair is one part incredible and three parts maddening.
TVDOC said that if I post anything from Real Climate he will delete it.
Yes, well, they do play the part of Mann-handlers gay cabana boy. They have no one to blame buth themselves. Perhaps you should be grateful for not being allowed to embarrass yourself.
