« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?  (Read 1898 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bijou

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8937
  • Reputation: +336/-26
ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« on: January 08, 2010, 07:00:24 AM »

Quote
knew there had to be a “Paul Harvey” version to this story. See the white guy in the white suit? Now see the blond in the white dress? See the guy in the middle…hmmm-m-m. This picture was taken June 9, 2005. It seems Obama has known these two phonies for awhile, at least from the time he was a Senator. They’re getting all the press now as being “party crashers” and the secret service is taking the fall. Funny how this hasn't come out in the press, don'tcha think?

No wonder the couple who crashed Obama’s State dinner keep insisting they were invited guests. They know Barry from way back when he was still an Illinois Senator. Is Obama trying to throw the Secret Service under the bus?

Tareq and Michaele Salahi snapped the pic above with Obama at a “Rock The Vote” event on June 9, 2005 (also attended by John McCain…with whom the Salahi’s also took a pic). McCain won an award for his work on campaign finance reform. Obama won an award for “forming a multiracial coalition in winning his seat.”

Michaele Salahi is getting quite a ribbing in the press for lying about being a Redskins cheerleader, but Tareq is the more interesting of the two to me. He has ties to Palestinian terrorists. Tareq is a board member of the ATFP- American Task Force on Palestine , which has quickly scrubbed it’s site of the fact. Thank the Lord for Google cache.

And just who are the ATFP? The ATFP has ties to Chicago, ties to Muslim radicals, ties to Hamas, and ties to Saudi Wahhabists. It is arguably the American wing oF Hamas. The group’s co-founder is Rashid Khalidi, the guy purported to have helped finance Obama’s Harvard education and who was also instrumental in getting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak at Columbia University. During the Beruit war, Khalidi was a PLO spokesperson. After the war, he came back to teach at the University of Chicago. He is a virulent critic of Israel, and [was] a strong supporter of Fatah terrorist Yassar Arafat. Obama has referred to Khalidi as someone who challenges his “own biases.” ...
http://tcotblog.ning.com/profiles/blogs/anybody-here-look-familiar

Found this on FR, I hadn't seen this before.
Logged


Offline VelvetElvis

  • Misunderestimated
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1285
  • Reputation: +123/-5
  • Drill Sgt for the DeathSquadHateForce
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2010, 07:50:51 AM »
And in 3....2....1....

"This is not the Tareq and Michaele I thought I knew...."
Logged
Proud Member of the Death Squad Hate Force Since  1980

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2010, 08:05:06 AM »
WTF. Ugh. I find it more damning that they are connecting the dots between Teh Wun and this radical group.....Hello?? Is this thing on????
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 08:06:56 AM by DixieBelle »
Logged
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2010, 11:15:16 AM »
Is that Randy Jackson on the far left?

White man in white suit usually means pimp, right?

Just kidding.
Logged

Offline Wineslob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14480
  • Reputation: +816/-193
  • Sucking the life out of Liberty
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2010, 12:17:06 PM »
They're with the Black Eyed Peas.................is see Fugly Furgie.
Logged
“The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.”

        -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC (106-43 BC)

The unobtainable is unknown at Zombo.com



"Practice random violence and senseless acts of brutality"

If you want a gender neutral bathroom, go pee in the forest.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2010, 12:22:23 PM »
Curiouser and curiouser.
Logged
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline littlelamb

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3035
  • Reputation: +55/-18
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2010, 01:16:50 AM »
I am wondering how long it is before the media puts a good spin on it :popcorn:
Logged
Good girls are bad girls that never get caught.

Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2010, 01:25:08 AM »
This story's been "out" for at least 24 hours.  If past performance is any indication, they will ignore it over the weekend, and Monday is just too important to sully with trivial details like this.  My guess is the earliest you'll see it is a brush-off from one of the alphabet networks and the papers of record on Tuesday.  It will be a small two-paragraph article without a photo buried toward the end of the NY Times section A next to news about some obscure UN ambassador, and CNN will relegate it to one of their celebrity gossip shows instead of reporting it as news.  It will only be mentioned once and promptly forgotten.

Just a guess...
Logged
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2010, 01:26:49 AM »
Quote from: Chris on January 09, 2010, 01:25:08 AM
This story's been "out" for at least 24 hours.  If past performance is any indication, they will ignore it over the weekend, and Monday is just too important to sully with trivial details like this.  My guess is the earliest you'll see it is a brush-off from one of the alphabet networks and the papers of record on Tuesday.  It will be a small two-paragraph article without a photo buried toward the end of the NY Times section A next to news about some obscure UN ambassador, and CNN will relegate it to one of their celebrity gossip shows instead of reporting it as news.  It will only be mentioned once and promptly forgotten.

Just a guess...

CNN will mention it briefly once at 2AM and then it becomes old news, not worth rehashing.
Logged

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: ANYBODY HERE LOOK FAMILIAR?
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2010, 01:29:03 AM »
CNN doesn't cover Sarah Palin in their news broadcasts anymore.  She gets pushed aside to the gossip shows like The Insider that obsessively cover that creepy woman with eight kids and her loser husband.  Its the easiest way for them to discredit people they don't like.  Either way, this story will be buried faster than a turd in a fresh box of Tidy Cat.
Logged
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »