That might be a fascinating little wedge into blowing this b.s. up. If Reid intends to change the Senate's Rules to require a super-majority to overturn deathpanel regulations, then he's going to have to have 67 votes to change those rules; since he's only going to have at most 60 votes to enact Obamadeathcare, then that part of the bill will be invalid, which opens up the question of whether or not it's appropriate to invalidate the entire bill, or to simply blue-pencil that particular provision. The same applies to the attempt to subvert the rules of the House of Representatives.
Regardless, it does demonstrate, beyond peradventure, that the Democrats' sole aim here is to effect a de-facto seizure of power - a Hugo Chavez style coup - not to "reform" healthcare.