Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Warpy (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:30 AMResponse to Reply #17 57. He was the only one I mooned in my last reply as he hit the pit of eternal ignore.I don't know what his game was/is, but he hasn't been registered at that other site long. I think he'll probably play the same games over there, too.It's just one less "ignored" I'll see on my screen.
greyl (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:32 AMResponse to Original message 60. Why do you believe that's really him in the thread you found? nt jobycom (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:37 AMResponse to Reply #60 73. Wondered that, too. How does the OP know who he was on this other site? I guess they aren't allowed to say what site it was. Th1onein (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:47 AMResponse to Reply #60 84. I think it would be really convoluted that someone would pose as him on another forum. Just to fool us into thinking he was a troll here, when he had just been tombstoned here for being a troll, don't you? I mean, come on. That would be one hell of a stretch. spoony (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:55 AMResponse to Reply #84 104. Not necessarily, if it's the site I'm thinking of. They've had a few fake visits from "DUers". In fact I think they had a fake OMC before. Those people are pathological. It's hard to understate, or keep up with, their stupid little games. greyl (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:01 AMResponse to Reply #84 117. Forgive me for noticing, but doesn't your OP involve lots of convolution? Besides, convolution thrives on the Internet.
spoony (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:59 AM114. I knew his name before I saw it. Unless you think he searched for an obit with his last name, in his stated city, at the stated time of his wife's death. Even people who can be bombastic and dickish can lose loved ones. shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:03 AMResponse to Reply #114 121. A simple yes would have sufficed. shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:03 AMResponse to Reply #121 122. You knew him personally or he told you his name? spoony (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:05 AMResponse to Reply #121 126. It wouldn't appear so. Since you posted so many times in this one thread questioning it. If a yes would have sufficed this conversation wouldn't be happening. ...and apparently it isn't sufficing even now, since you want to keep questioning it...have fun, pal. shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:06 AMResponse to Reply #126 128. Whatever see above. Did you know him personally? shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:07 AMResponse to Reply #128 129. Sorry It's late. My follow up questions are a little slow tonight. spoony (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:09 AMResponse to Reply #128 136. I guess a simple yes wouldn't suffice. Listen, you want to doubt that story. I don't care. I find it in poor taste, but whatever. The guy signed his name to a PM he sent me, I didn't see his birth certificate. shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:14 AMResponse to Reply #136 145. So, NO. You didn't know him personally and he just told you his name. Which makes everything you just wrote clown shoes. spoony (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:20 AMResponse to Reply #145 158. Ok then. Like I said, if you want to think that he told people his last name, whether real or not, then spent God-knows-how-long searching the obits from his town to find a young woman with the same name to claim was his wife, that's your own business. I don't particularly feel like digging up a grave to satisfy you, so continue on alone. shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 01:22 AMResponse to Reply #158 164. Or you could admit that you were probably suckered.
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 12:35 AMResponse to Reply #62 67. Repugnicans actually pay operatives to be actors in websites... and create havoc and chaos among libs. Some libs are incredibly gullible and fall for it. Before you know it, the Repigs have managed to turn libs against libs.
Gee, I wonder what that site is.
This thread is too much.
The operating one's here?
Disclosure: contrary to what might, or might not, be popular perception, the passionate primitive, the Sarah Ibarruri primitive, is NOT franksolich's mole.
Someone using the name 'OMC' is at Conservative Underground.
Conservative Underground has been around for years. Comparatively, they have more cachet, more prestige, more name recognition than we do even if the product we offer is superior.
I want that job.
Really? I just checked their members list and there isn't one?
One's intrigued as to how the passionate primitive would know that.
He's still on CU as a member. To show on the Member List you have to have at least10 posts and he obviously doesn't have them yet.We currently have two of them, OMC and THEREALOMC.
Has anyone ascertained if either one is the OMC that posted at the DUmp? If so has he admitted to being a troll?KC
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-12-09 04:45 AMResponse to Original message 282. locking Looks like everyone has had enough gravedancing for the evening.
Well, there used to be an OMC over there.I forget about when that was; it's been a while.
