Author Topic: primitives discuss clothed cookware  (Read 1076 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitives discuss clothed cookware
« on: December 06, 2009, 03:53:34 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=236x71852

Oh my.

Quote
tigereye  (1000+ posts)        Sat Dec-05-09 03:25 PM
Original message
 
Went to my first All-Clad sale today! Wow, great bargains. 

When I think about how much I could have spent - I think I did pretty damn well. But alas, no copper-covered pots - as beautiful as they were, too damn dear for the budget, even at 40-60% off!

I got 2 2 quart saucepans, one for a Christmas gift, and two frying pans. Went with the " no coating" option.

Also got some new baking sheets and jelly roll pans.

The sparkling husband primitive, boasting about all the expensive stuff he owns:

Quote
Stinky The Clown  (1000+ posts)        Sat Dec-05-09 10:16 PM
NOMINATED FOR TOP PRIMITIVE OF 2009
Response to Original message

1. I have a few pieces of Spring copper clad multi-ply cookware ......

Spring and All Clad are essentially the same stuff. Spring is the commercial brand and All Clad the consumer brand.

As seems to be common knowledge in these parts, I also have more than a few pieces of actual copper cookware.

I think you did well to pass up the copper clad stuff. In my view, it is just cosmetic as the copper cladding is so thin as to border on the "why bother" end of things. The core of my stuff is aluminum and the inner layer is stainless. I can't imagine the pans' performance is any better than the stainless stuff with the same aluminum core.

All my solid copper stuff has tin inside. They make solid copper with stainless inside. That's nice stuff if only for the cosmetic advantage that the stainless is easy to clean whereas the tin naturally turns gray and looks perpetually dingy - even though its quite clean.

I have copper and I have stainless multi-ply. Not All Clad, but similar. The copper is noticeably more responsive.

Quote
tigereye  (1000+ posts)        Sun Dec-06-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
 
2. it's just that the copper stuff is so beautiful - I think that's part of the attraction. I have Revereware pots with the copper bottom and those just last and last.

The copper All-Clad stuff was out of my price range anyway, but it's good to know that I made both an economical and good cooking decision!
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: primitives discuss clothed cookware
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2009, 04:00:00 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=236x71852
Oh my.
The sparkling husband primitive, boasting about all the expensive stuff he owns:

He has really dedicated himself to his bragging lately, rubbing the DUmmies' noses in their daily grind of poverty. We may soon have to start referring to him as Husb2greenbriar, since it appears that Pammie D has been scared off long term.