Well educate Homeslice on the definition of "bouncy".
Well I didn't legitimize that part of it, Reb. I did say that I thought it was just a posting mistake, but apparently it was an intricacy in the law which is also another quirk I had considered as well after Homeslice pointed it out. I thought the bouncy thing was such totally idiocy it didn't need addressing. And as for definition....'homeslice'(very good name

) should know that a bouncy is littered with exaggerations and over the top incidents that are put in and 'decorated' for no other reason then to gain 'street cred' or to 'one up' another DUer. It seems sometimes DU make them up to be a part of the group at any given time and adopt one another's happenings to do so.
Karin's description would not fit a bouncy. It was neither an exaggeration, an untruth, nor was it over the top. It contained a piece of history that I(and maybe you) were too young to know(the variance in min. wage depending on the job and age of the person working).
Bouncy definition ok?

BTW, Karin, I'm sorry if I implied by posting the min wage thing that I agreed with Homeslice on the bouncy thing. I did NOT agree with it, nor did I mean to imply any deception on your part(that never crossed my mind) and it's why I added what I did. I knew most likely there was something I didn't know about min. wage during that time and figured one of you peeps would correct the basic table on it from that times if there were intricacies(and you did

)