And so begins the Thought Police. How else are they supposed to ascertain that person A HATES person B while assaulting them? People will be punished for facts that are incapable of being placed in evidence, specifically their state of mind and thoughts. How can one refute an allegation of hateful thoughts? "No, I wasn't thinking that." doesn't seem like it would rise to the level of reasonable doubt. Better question, how can the STATE PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was motivated by hate at all? What evidence can they present?
Unfortunately, we've been down this road before. It makes as little sense now as it did then.
BTW, very good treatment of this subject: South Park episode "Cartman's Silly Hate Crime 2000"