Author Topic: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious  (Read 1222 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« on: October 09, 2009, 04:17:16 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6740011

Oh my.

Pedro Picasso.

Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Fri Oct-09-09 05:13 PM
Original message
 
Sarah Palin's "best seller" status already looks a bit dubious.

I noticed an ad for Palin's book FREE on one of the freeper sites. It seems Newsmax has bulk purchased them and is giving them away with subscriptions. So when the righties get all crazy about the awesome new book and how great it's selling, remember where you usually find Coulter books and most stuff by Regenry -- in the Dollar bin, after all the bulk purchases have to be dumped from inventory.

Quote
rvablue  (1000+ posts)        Fri Oct-09-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
 
1. Undoubtedly, there will be a cross next to it on the NYT bestseller list.

Oh, I dunno.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2009, 05:43:01 PM »
Such bulk purchases of books by political figures are quite typical, Left and Right.  Certainly there is no other way to account for Hillary's book sales.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2009, 06:20:10 PM »
Such bulk purchases of books by political figures are quite typical, Left and Right.  Certainly there is no other way to account for Hillary's book sales.
Politicians publish ghostwritten books because book sales, bulk or otherwise, are not subject
to campaign finance restrictions. Individuals are limited to only a few thousand dollars
contributed to a candidate, but can buy any number of books.  I suspect a very small percentage
of politician-authored books sold are actually read, or even removed from their cartons.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2009, 06:23:41 PM »
Politicians publish ghostwritten books because book sales, bulk or otherwise, are not subject
to campaign finance restrictions. Individuals are limited to only a few thousand dollars
contributed to a candidate, but can buy any number of books.  I suspect a very small percentage
of politician-authored books sold are actually read, or even removed from their cartons.

I don't see much of the GOP establishment willing to pony up the cash to help Sarah Palin. Some of hers sales may be bulk, but I bet most of the pre-orders are legitimate.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2009, 06:34:53 PM »
Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Fri Oct-09-09 05:13 PM
Original message
 
Sarah Palin's "best seller" status already looks a bit dubious.

I noticed an ad for Palin's book FREE on one of the freeper sites. It seems Newsmax has bulk purchased them and is giving them away with subscriptions. So when the righties get all crazy about the awesome new book and how great it's selling, remember where you usually find Coulter books and most stuff by Regenry -- in the Dollar bin, after all the bulk purchases have to be dumped from inventory.

Okay DUmbass that would simply mean Newsmax would consider it a valuable investment of resources to advertise its own product.
What makes that any different then a bookstore buying them to sell?
Not a bit and quite a bit different then Jim Wrights collection of one word chapters that were never marketed or distributed to the general public in any fashion.


Offline ColonialMarine0431

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
  • Reputation: +167/-18
  • DEUS VULT
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2009, 06:54:08 PM »
Palin drives libturds nuts.

I love it.  :lmao:
I'll See Your Jihad and Raise You One Crusade

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2009, 07:10:31 PM »
Newsmax often offers a current best selling book as a premium to sign up for their service.

When unions buy some liberal screed in bulk, they simply warehouse them and never even think of giving them away free.  Probably because nobody wants them.
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline RobJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8876
  • Reputation: +333/-109
Re: Pedro Picasso looking a bit dubious
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2009, 12:24:51 AM »
Didn't $kinner give away copies of Obama's book during a fundrasing drive?