Author Topic: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer  (Read 4472 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« on: October 07, 2009, 03:41:09 PM »
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday reached an agreement that would allow the Obama administration to continue bringing foreign terrorism suspects from the Guantanamo Bay prison to the United States to face trial.

Negotiators from the House of Representatives and the Senate included the agreement in a $42.8 billion bill that would fund the Homeland Security Department for the current fiscal year.

Both chambers still must pass the bill before President Barack Obama can sign it into law.

The Obama administration hopes to bring some of the 223 detainees remaining in the facility to the United States to face charges in American courtrooms. Republicans and some Democrats have worried that housing the suspects on U.S. soil could create security risks.

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5965MH20091007
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2009, 03:51:30 PM »
Great put them on our soil so they can say "Where are my rights" WTF??
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9128
  • Reputation: +607/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2009, 01:06:41 AM »
Great put them on our soil so they can say "Where are my rights" WTF??
 

WTF, indeed!  Just when you think these morons can't go any lower and have reached bottom, they start digging....
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Offline Deuce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2009, 08:03:00 AM »
I'm not worried about security so much as what our legal system will do with them. A supermax isn't letting anybody out by accident, but some ACLU lawyer might convince a judge to let some of them off on a technicality.


Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2009, 08:09:04 AM »
I'm not worried about security so much as what our legal system will do with them. A supermax isn't letting anybody out by accident, but some ACLU lawyer might convince a judge to let some of them off on a technicality.



Which is f'd up because they didn't commit a crime under our legal system's jurisdiction.

The American Citizen - fewer rights in America than anyone else.

Offline Chump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2009, 06:16:51 PM »
I wonder if this encourages those serving to take no prisoners, ya know?
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.   ~Robert A. Heinlein

...let the cannibal who snarls that the freedom of man's mind was needed to create an industrial civilization, but is not needed to maintain it, be given an arrowhead and bearskin, not a university chair of economics.
~Atlas Shrugged, Galt's speech

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2009, 07:21:43 PM »
Where are they going to send them to Leavenworth or spread them out?
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2009, 07:26:09 PM »
Send them to DC. Seriously.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2009, 09:16:29 AM »
Then they will feel at home with all of the corpution there
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Deuce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2009, 07:39:23 PM »
Which is f'd up because they didn't commit a crime under our legal system's jurisdiction.

The American Citizen - fewer rights in America than anyone else.

It is a pretty messed up situation. They aren't innocent, but what legal grounds do we have for holding them? If they're criminals, they should go through the criminal justice system. To be a POW and therefore protected by the Geneva Convention, you have to be a "lawful combatant," which these people don't qualify for. We conveniently label them "unlawful combatants" who basically don't have any rights.

Moving them to the US forces our legal system to deal with them, but I'd bet after all this time the documentation that would be proof of guilt is no longer available for at least some of them.

Maybe we really should take the high road and let them go. A lot of them were just kids when captured.

I dunno.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2009, 10:49:57 PM »
It is a pretty messed up situation. They aren't innocent, but what legal grounds do we have for holding them? If they're criminals, they should go through the criminal justice system. To be a POW and therefore protected by the Geneva Convention, you have to be a "lawful combatant," which these people don't qualify for. We conveniently label them "unlawful combatants" who basically don't have any rights.

Moving them to the US forces our legal system to deal with them, but I'd bet after all this time the documentation that would be proof of guilt is no longer available for at least some of them.

Maybe we really should take the high road and let them go. A lot of them were just kids when captured.

I dunno.

How about we afford them the full Geneva Convention protections for an unlawful combatant: summary execution.  I guarantee they won't fight any more Americans after that.

Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2009, 09:24:29 AM »
It is a pretty messed up situation. They aren't innocent, but what legal grounds do we have for holding them? If they're criminals, they should go through the criminal justice system. To be a POW and therefore protected by the Geneva Convention, you have to be a "lawful combatant," which these people don't qualify for. We conveniently label them "unlawful combatants" who basically don't have any rights.

Moving them to the US forces our legal system to deal with them, but I'd bet after all this time the documentation that would be proof of guilt is no longer available for at least some of them.

Maybe we really should take the high road and let them go. A lot of them were just kids when captured.

I dunno.

Holy hell. Are you seriously this intellectually challenged?

Offline Deuce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2009, 06:13:36 PM »
Holy hell. Are you seriously this intellectually challenged?

It's more of a general depression about the situation. It's a conflict between due process and what's actually right that bothers me.

Offline Chump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2009, 09:27:32 PM »
We conveniently label them "unlawful combatants" who basically don't have any rights.

It doesn't really seem like that has afforded any sort of "convenience" for us, by any stretch of the imagination.  It's made this situation one big cluster****, honestly.

I echo docstew's comment that we afford them what's coming an unlawful enemy combatant under the Geneva Conventions.

They have no rights, Deuce.  They could've just left well enough alone and never crossed paths with a white American devil.  Instead, they took arms against the United States of America fighting for an idea no more profound than, "I hate you."  They will stop at nothing.  They will kill themselves, their children, their wives, anyone, in the hopes of even hurting an American, civilian or military.  In fact, civilian targets are their favorite (emotional appeals and all).  It's messy and it's not a popular message, but these people need one bullet point-blank.  Our paramount responsibility at all times is the safety of our nation and its citizens, not the whining of some cocksucker getting three square meals, room to exercise, and free medical treatment.  The only truly sick aspect of the debate is that we're even having it.
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.   ~Robert A. Heinlein

...let the cannibal who snarls that the freedom of man's mind was needed to create an industrial civilization, but is not needed to maintain it, be given an arrowhead and bearskin, not a university chair of economics.
~Atlas Shrugged, Galt's speech

Offline Odin's Hand

  • is your new god!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Reputation: +366/-25
  • Quarters Champion
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2009, 09:41:03 PM »
Maybe we really should take the high road and let them go. A lot of them were just kids when captured.

Yeah, let them f*cking go...

So we can see more of this?

Quote
Ex-Gitmo Detainee Believed Responsible for Homicide Bombing In Iraq

Monday, May 05, 2008 


Three years ago, Abdullah Saleh al-Ajmi, a Kuwaiti soldier who deserted to fight in Afghanistan alongside the Taliban, sat in a detention cell at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, while lawyers argued whether he was an "enemy combatant."

Last week, a Dubai-based television channel reported that al-Ajmi was killed carrying out a homicide bombing in Mosul, Iraq.

While the report did not specify which attack Abdullah carried out, Iraqi officials reported that Mosul was hit on April 26 by three homicide attacks, killing seven people.

CBS News reported that al-Ajmi carried out an attack on Wednesday, April 30, according to an unconfirmed report posted on a jihadist Web site.

Al-Ajmi's cousin, Salem, reportedly told Al-Arabiya television that , "We were shocked by the painful news we received ... from one of the friends of martyr Abdullah in Iraq."


Link

 :bird:
"Hell is full of good wishes and desires"~St. Bernhard of Clairvaux

"Brave men are found where brave men are honored."~Aristotle

"Generally speaking, the "Way of the Warrior" is resolute acceptance of death."~ Miyamoto Musashi

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2009, 09:42:33 PM »
I wonder if this encourages those serving to take no prisoners, ya know?

It would to me if I was still wearing the uniform.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2009, 09:44:39 PM »
How about we afford them the full Geneva Convention protections for an unlawful combatant: summary execution.  I guarantee they won't fight any more Americans after that.

Works for me.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: U.S. lawmakers agree to Guantanamo prisoner transfer
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2009, 09:45:55 PM »
It's more of a general depression about the situation. It's a conflict between due process and what's actually right that bothers me.

What due process are you talking about?  Unlawful combatants aren't afforded any under the Geneva conventions.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944