Author Topic: High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land  (Read 1265 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land
« on: October 07, 2009, 07:31:01 AM »
Quote
High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is taking up a long-running legal fight over a cross honoring World War I soldiers that has stood for 75 years on public land in a remote part of California.

The cross, on an outcrop known as Sunrise Rock in the Mojave National Preserve, has been covered in plywood for the past several years following federal court rulings that it violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment prohibition against government endorsement of religion.

MORE

Quote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Why do so many judges forget about that part? 

If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2009, 07:42:14 AM »
How does the physical presence of a cross on public land in Nevada constitute Congress making a law respecting an establishment of religion?

Lawyers have to read so much in law school.  You'd think they would all stumble on the concept of reading for comprehension at some point.
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.   ~Robert A. Heinlein

...let the cannibal who snarls that the freedom of man's mind was needed to create an industrial civilization, but is not needed to maintain it, be given an arrowhead and bearskin, not a university chair of economics.
~Atlas Shrugged, Galt's speech

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2009, 07:54:53 AM »
Congress has designated the Cross as a war memorial, that should have ended it.  Too bad the minority of atheists and Christian-haters tend to get their way.  If they can force the removal of this cross, then what is to stop someone from trying to remove all of the crosses at Arlington and other veterans cemeteries?

Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: High Court Takes Up Case of Cross on Public Land
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2009, 08:39:57 AM »
Why is it okay to endorse and make exceptions for the muslim community? Happening all the time in MN - seems like the 14th isn't being applied equally.

If this happens, the next thing will be Arlington.