Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Here in Ohio, refusal to take the breathalyser test results in an automatic one year DL supsension.
Officers can't hold down a suspect and force them to breath into a tube, she noted, but they can forcefully take blood — a practice that's been upheld by Idaho's Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court.
It's an AP article on Yahoo. I'm not so sure that I like the idea of police officers trying to draw blood from a person who has already refused a breathalyser test . I've seen trained professionals have trouble withdrawing blood from a cooperative person. Why not, just make it so the only place for the person to go the bathroom is in a sterile container to get a urine sample. Better yet, just make the penalties for refusing a breathalyser test just as severe as the DUI?
Something we agree on!! Personally I think that randomly stopping individuals or setting up check points should be outlawed. If the police has reasonable suspicion fine, if not then to bad!
It's not random. They stop everyone at the check point.
Not always. I've seen some checkpoints here , where they will only flag every 4th or 5th car or some other random number.
I thought they picked all the ones with Ooooobama bumper stickers.
Surprisingly enough, the city of Chicago did that at least once. About 10 years ago, I got off on Irving Park from the Kennedy, and they were randomly picking cars/people to take field sobriety tests.