Author Topic: Pedro Picasso notes concern  (Read 756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58700
  • Reputation: +3073/-173
Pedro Picasso notes concern
« on: August 10, 2009, 06:06:16 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6266264

Oh my.

Quote
Karmadillo (1000+ posts)      Mon Aug-10-09 11:07 AM
Original message
 
There is No Recession: It's a Planned Demolition 

It's worth reading all of this one. Not necessarily the view you'll get from the NY Times, but one that seems to fit well with the existing facts.

blahblahblahblahblah......

Pedro Picasso:

Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Mon Aug-10-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
 
1. This should be common knowledge. 

Bush, Norquist, et al, were thrilled to speak of "drowning the economy in a bathtub" BEFORE they got elected. Practically bragged about it. Now, after they've met their goals admirably, people say "Pshaw! Why would anyone want to ruin the economy?" Because they're ****ing capitalist criminals. It's what they do. Might as well as why a shark eats seals.

Quote
Zodiak  (1000+ posts)        Mon Aug-10-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
 
7. Norquist wanted to drown the federal government in the bathtub, not the economy

Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Mon Aug-10-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
 
8. You tell me the difference, fundamentally.

He wanted to drown the whole damn thing. They spoke openly of massive social upheaval required to bring about the societal changes they wanted. Bankrupting the government (and keeping all the money for themselves as a hedge against the hard times they would be creating) was just the logical first step.

With the government insolvent, everything would have to be privatized, sold at fire-sale prices to desperate states and municipalities. Of course, the Bushies would be the one's there to scoop 'em all up. Again, they spoke openly of this strategy BEFORE Bush's first election theft.

I think the fact that we ignored it and no one revolted just emboldened them. Paulsen's tranfer of the final billions from our treasury to himself and his cronies through Goldman-Sachs was the final slurp of money going down the drain before Bush left office.

Quote
Zodiak  (1000+ posts)        Mon Aug-10-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
 
19. The difference is whether you are quoting it correctly or incorrectly

....and if you quote it incorrectly and are called out on it without admitting your mistake, it undermines your credibility.

The fundamental difference is that Norquist want to drown the government and hijack the economy.

Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Mon Aug-10-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
 
24. Your concern is noted.

"....and if you quote it incorrectly and are called out on it without admitting your mistake, it undermines your credibility."

There's one on every thread.

Uh-uh.  There's a primitive in every thread, giving Pedro Picasso static for misunderstanding things even a small child can understand.
apres moi, le deluge

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 06:16:35 PM »
Pedro may be on to something for a change. It is a planned destruction of the economy, he's just wrong about the who planned it.  0bama saw the precarious shape of the economy and new that with some help it would collapse and he has been pushing for it since he was selected. The socialists believe that a collapsing economy is fertile ground for the growth of class warfare.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58700
  • Reputation: +3073/-173
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 06:18:09 PM »
Pedro may be on to something for a change. It is a planned destruction of the economy, he's just wrong about the who planned it.  0bama saw the precarious shape of the economy and new that with some help it would collapse and he has been pushing for it since he was selected. The socialists believe that a collapsing economy is fertile ground for the growth of class warfare.

Also, don't forget.

When did the recession start?

Wasn't that shortly after November 2006?

One wonders what happened in November 2006.
apres moi, le deluge

Offline debk

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12473
  • Reputation: +467/-58
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2009, 06:42:42 PM »
Also, don't forget.

When did the recession start?

Wasn't that shortly after November 2006?

One wonders what happened in November 2006.


Oh...Oh....Oh.....I know!!!!! Call on me, please....please.....pleeeeeeeeassssssssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER CONNNNNNGRESSSS!!!!!!!!!


I'm soooooo smarrrrrrrrrrtttttttttttttt!!!.....but then.....I'm a CONSERVATIVE! :tongue:
Just hand over the chocolate...back away slowly...far away....and you won't get hurt....

Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.

"My therapist told me the way to achieve true inner peace is to finish what I start. So far I've finished two bags of M&M's and a chocolate cake. I feel better already." – Dave Barry

A balanced diet is chocolate in both hands.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2009, 06:44:49 PM »
Also, don't forget.

When did the recession start?

Wasn't that shortly after November 2006?

One wonders what happened in November 2006.

You have a point.  The Dims totally own this recession.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14590
  • Reputation: +2287/-76
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2009, 07:32:57 PM »
Quote from:
Atman
 
This should be common knowledge. 

Bush, Norquist, et al, were thrilled to speak of "drowning the economy in a bathtub" BEFORE they got elected. Practically bragged about it. Now, after they've met their goals admirably, people say "Pshaw! Why would anyone want to ruin the economy?" Because they're ******* capitalist criminals. It's what they do. Might as well as (sic) why a shark eats seals.

Since Pedro is a spelling Nazi, please note the misspelling of the word "ask."

Otherwise, Pedro continues down the trail of his own paranoia minus any evidence of what he claims is undisputed facts.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline Rebel

  • Stick a fork in us. We're done.
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16790
  • Reputation: +1248/-215
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2009, 07:37:09 PM »
Quote
"During eight years of the Bush Administration, the 400 richest Americans, who now own more than the bottom 150 million Americans, increased their net worth by $700 billion. In 2005, the top one per cent claimed 22 per cent of the national income, while the top ten per cent took half of the total income, the largest share since 1928.

Yeah, and unemployment was at 4.6%, the Dow was over 14 thousand, and we added massive amounts of jobs. Those EVIL RICH PEOPLE! We should punish them, damnit!  :whatever:

Trickle down works, fools. It's been proven. Trickle up, Keynesian economics? Well, how's that hopey changey thing working for ya now?
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline LC EFA

  • Hickus Australianus
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4527
  • Reputation: +414/-33
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2009, 07:45:21 PM »
Quote
"During eight years of the Bush Administration, the 400 richest Americans, who now own more than the bottom 150 million Americans, increased their net worth by $700 billion. In 2005, the top one per cent claimed 22 per cent of the national income, while the top ten per cent took half of the total income, the largest share since 1928.

In the same time frame how much did those bottom 150 million increase their own net worth by ?

Did a percentage of them sit around and bitch that someone was richer than them and demand the government do something ?


Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10449
  • Reputation: +1015/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2009, 09:02:53 PM »
This whole bathtub drowning thing has grown old. It makes one think the primitives have something against bathing.

Offline Rebel

  • Stick a fork in us. We're done.
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16790
  • Reputation: +1248/-215
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2009, 10:38:45 PM »
This whole bathtub drowning thing has grown old. It makes one think the primitives have something against bathing.

That's not a stretch.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline crockspot

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1985
  • Reputation: +80/-7
  • Bite me, libs.
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2009, 05:48:32 AM »
Yeah, and unemployment was at 4.6%, the Dow was over 14 thousand, and we added massive amounts of jobs. Those EVIL RICH PEOPLE! We should punish them, damnit!  :whatever:

Trickle down works, fools. It's been proven. Trickle up, Kenyan economics? Well, how's that hopey changey thing working for ya now?

Fix0red!!!111

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Pedro Picasso notes concern
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2009, 09:01:11 AM »
Someone wanted to drown the federal government?....why those water polluting bastards.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin