I'm bored because I can't do anything around the house that might mess it up because it is on the market (that means no quilting). So I'm sitting here doing laundry and wasting time on the computer. I swear I am about to go mad, it is so hard keeping your house looking as though no one lives in it. I'm afraid to take my sheets off my bed and wash them for fear that when my sheets are in the washer someone will call and want to see the house. So I woke up really early this morning and washed both my sheets and my sons so I could get them back on the beds before someone called to view the house. Figures that no one has called when I make such an effort.
Same with yesterday, we decided not to hang around the house so we ran around picking everything up, dusting, vacuuming and cleaning toilets..etc. When someone comes to view the house we take the dogs over to my Mom's because I can't just leave them out when people come into the house. They wont bite or anything but they bark A LOT and jump up on people. We could crate them but they would still bark a ton so we take them over to my Mom's every time someone comes to view the house. So yesterday we took them over to her house and decided to go to a museum. We decided to go to Dallas yesterday to walk around the City Arts fair (it was HOT as HELL too). We went to the
Nasher Sculpture Center and the
Dallas Museum of Art.While looking at all this art I couldn't help but notice that some of it looked like a child did it in under a minute and some looked like it took YEARS to accomplish. As we have all heard that art is subjective (which it is undoubtably true), I couldn't help but wonder what makes an artist use certain subjects over others. Take my brother for instance, he is a huge lib. He wants to be the next "Piss Christ" guy so bad. He is an excellent photographer yet the subjects he chooses he chooses to "shock" the public. What makes someone want to shock everyone vs someone who creates something beautiful? I was discussing this with my husband and he said that some people are just ugly inside and that their "art" reflects what is inside of them but what makes what I consider "ugly" attractive to someone else?
While I think that some "statement art" is good for the status quo, why do so many "artist" want to offend with their "art"?