Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Sat Jun-13-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. And you know what else?
A mother who doesn't take the time to give her teenage daughter the loving and responsible attention the girl needs so that she won't go looking for love, and ending up having unprotected sex with her boyfriend, getting pregnant, and having a child out of wedlock ALL BEFORE HER HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION.
Yeah, maybe someday one of your children will actually finish high school without sitting it out somewhere else, taking correspondence courses, and go to college, like so many millions of kids do, instead of having to join the Army to avoid going to the slammer or maybe opting for a community college because the kid has to stay home to take care of her baby.
So far, you're 0 for 2. How's that for YOUR self-esteem as a parent, hmmmm?
Yeah, Sarah, self-esteem starts at home, but you're too busy being a publicity-crazed whore to notice that.
I said "whore," Sarah, and I meant you. Wanna take me on, too, honey?
I dare this crazy leftist bitch to apply her logic to the scores of mothers on public assistance in one fashion or another. You know, the masses she defends as both relevant and worthy of care and concern because they are able to do everything she just said about Sarah Palin's daughter. You see, pointing out the obvious to scores of mooching welfare mothers is either racist, sexist, or insensitive(sometimes all three), but doing so(even if it isn't true) of one's political foe is apparently divine. See I guess her argument would be that Sarah Palin should know better, being she is better educated then the scores of idiots out there raising childrne on the taxpayer dime and earn the love of liberals everywhere. But then this creates a dilemma in liberal thinking yet again since we are to believe, by their claims, that Sarah Palin is an idiot. So if she is an idiot, then she should be absolved of any parenting issues she has ala the same way they absolve every unwed mother who mooches on the taxpayer out there of any responsibility, right? Or they have to give up on the idiot line if they wish to pin her with some responsibility and admit she isn't exactly the idiot they make her out to be...same kind of pretzel logic they had to use when they called Bush an idiot I might add.
When anyone stops to think about how silly their finger pointing is, it is quick to see that their campaign against Sarah Palin has nothing to do with her parenting abilities or whether she's pretty or not(which liberal women in particular seem to loathe seeing as the ugly ones seem to be stuck back in high school railing against all the 'mean girls' which of course is any woman who is not only smarter then them ,but also looks better then them--wow, for all their feminism they aren't beyond basic female cattiness--imagine!), or whether she's even qualified for any role in the political world. Their campaign against Sarah Palin is based solely on the fact that she is an outspoken, female conservative who won't take any shit when a family member of hers is attacked. I know they don't get why Sarah Palin defends her daughter considering DUmmies interaction with family members consists of shitting all over them on a public message board and disowning them for not falling in lock step with their own beliefs, but some people actually have a loyalty for family and a duty to protect them(particularly their MINOR children).
