Author Topic: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode  (Read 2503 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« on: June 12, 2009, 10:00:23 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5832231

Quote
boston bean (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:19 AM
Original message
Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. 
 From Americablog:

Joe and I have been trying since last night to get a copy of the government's brief just filed in this case. This is not the GLAD case that we've written about previously, it's another in California. We just got the brief from reader Lavi Soloway. It's pretty despicable. Here is the entire document, and below are excerpts:


"The constitutional propriety of Congress's decision to decline to extend federal benefits immediately to newly recognized types of marriages is bolstered by Congress's articulated interest in preserving the scarce resources of both the federal and State governments. DOMA ensures that evolving understandings of the institution of marriage at the State level do not place greater financial and administrative obligations on federal and state benefits programs. Preserving scarce government resources — and deciding to extend benefits incrementally — are well-recognized legitimate interests under rational-basis review. See Butler, 144 F.3d at 625 ("There is nothing irrational about Congress's stated goal of conserving social security resources, and Congress can incrementally pursue that goal."); Hassan v. Wright, 45 F.3d 1063, 1069 (7th Cir. 1995) ("
rotecting the fisc provides a rational basis for Congress' line drawing in this instance."). Congress expressly relied on these interests in enacting DOMA: Government currently provides an array of material and other benefits to married couples in an effort to promote, protect, and prefer the institution of marriage. . . . If were to permit homosexuals to marry, these marital benefits would, absent some legislative response, presumably have to be made available to homosexual couples and surviving spouses of homosexual marriages on the same terms as they are now available to opposite-sex married couples and spouses. To deny federal recognition to same-sex marriages will thus preserve scarce government resources, surely a legitimate government purpose."

Gays have no constitutional right to marriage, or recognition of their marriages by other states:Plaintiffs are married, and their challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") poses a different set of questions: whether by virtue of their marital status they are constitutionally entitled to acknowledgment of their union by States that do not recognize same-sex marriage, and whether they are similarly entitled to certain federal benefits. Under the law binding on this Court, the answer to these questions must be no.

Read Obama's motion to dismiss DOMA case here:

http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/obama-justice-depart...


 


Quote
redqueen  (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. So.... Obama wrote that motion to dismiss?

Quote
nichomachus (1000+ posts)      Fri Jun-12-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes he did
 Remember -- the buck stops with him. What the **** -- do you think some underling wrote it and sabotaged Obama with it? He is responsible for whatever the executive branch does -- that's why they call him the ******* president.

Bastard!

Quote
mnhtnbb  (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. OMG. Try changing the language to extending the right to vote to African Americans
 and the stress that will put on scarce government resources and see how it reads.

This is unbelievable. Let's deny equal rights because it will preserve scarce governmental resources.

Jesse Helms would be proud.

Quote
boston bean (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Yep here it would be in all it's bigoted glory
 Plaintiffs are of mixed race, and their challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") poses a different set of questions: whether by virtue of their marital status they are constitutionally entitled to acknowledgment of their union by States that do not recognize racially mixed marriage, and whether they are similarly entitled to certain federal benefits. Under the law binding on this Court, the answer to these questions must be no.

sounds pretty grotesque to me.

Quote
GodlessBiker  (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. O...M...G! ******* ******* bastards.

And the top post award go to............

Quote
QC  (1000+ posts)      Fri Jun-12-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. But surely this must be some kind of triple reverse Mr. Spock 300-dimensional chess strategy
 too complex for mere mortals to comprehend! Mustn't it?

Quote
boston bean (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. won't be long before someone comes on and asks
 Why can't all these LGBTers (ones who have serious doubts) just hush up and find their place quietly under the bus.

When will they realize that obama is a Socialist and no friend of queers?

Quote
nichomachus (1000+ posts)      Fri Jun-12-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well, they are absolutely correct about saving money
 It will be a cold cold day in hell before I give a cent to any Democrat running for anything. This is going to save me lots and lots of money.
 

Yeah right.

Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19492
  • Reputation: +2553/-49
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2009, 10:04:38 AM »
Poor DUmmies. :evillaugh:
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2009, 10:11:02 AM »
Imagine that, a Dem administration DOJ brief I actually agree with. Sumbitch!

 :cheersmate:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2009, 10:11:15 AM »
Quote
mnhtnbb  (1000+ posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. OMG. Try changing the language to extending the right to vote to African Americans
 and the stress that will put on scarce government resources and see how it reads.

This is really a dumbass argument to use.  It's not as if black people were able to vote and chose not too.  They couldn't vote at all.  I think traditional marriage is open to everyone of age who wants to participate.  No one is denied this part of our society.

DUmbass argument.  

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2009, 10:12:32 AM »

When will they realize that obama is a Socialist and no friend of queers?

I dunno.

About the same time the primitives realize terrorists are no friends of theirs.

But of course it's pretty useless to realize something when one's dead.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Ree

  • It's Ree...
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1963
  • Reputation: +110/-42
  • 100+ pounds lighter.. Ain't I hot
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2009, 10:15:47 AM »
The GLBT under the bus go bump, bump, bump......
In Tennessee. I came down here to get warm,froze my arse off since I got here..
Just my luck... ;-P

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2009, 10:16:57 AM »
So 0bama is to the right of Cheney on this issue?

:rofl:
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2009, 10:21:10 AM »
Quote
BolivarianHero (139 posts)        Fri Jun-12-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. If blood must be spillt to deal with the religious right...
   Then let the ****ers bleed!

Shit-stirring mole.  Which one of you posted this?   :cheersmate:

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2009, 10:21:37 AM »
I'll be interested in seeing just how strongly Dear Leader's justice department presses their side of the case.  I don't put it past this dolt to takes sides on an issue in order to goof it up.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2009, 10:22:46 AM »
Quote
Starry Messenger  (1000+ posts)          Fri Jun-12-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. This is disgusting.
   I'm having so many reactions I don't know where to start. I'm ashamed to be straight today. I'm ashamed to be an American.

So it's just a normal day for you, huh Starry?

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2009, 10:27:15 AM »
I see no other purpose for gays to wish for "marriage" status except to extract the financial benefits society allows.
That makes it a perfectly valid arguement against.

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2009, 10:32:07 AM »
Quote
Starry Messenger  (1000+ posts)          Fri Jun-12-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. This is disgusting.
   I'm having so many reactions I don't know where to start. I'm ashamed to be straight today. I'm ashamed to be an American.

That's OK, we actually never thought you American, or for that matter relevent, anyway!
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2009, 10:41:09 AM »
Whenever I read a headline here at the DUmpster that says ".......Heads Explode"  it cheers me with a deep warm feeling.   

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19492
  • Reputation: +2553/-49
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2009, 10:47:00 AM »
Whenever I read a headline here at the DUmpster that says ".......Heads Explode"  it cheers me with a deep warm feeling.   

I always try to add a "heads explode", "chaos ensue", "flamesfest", or some such description if it is a particularly entertaining thread.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline crockspot

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1985
  • Reputation: +80/-7
  • Bite me, libs.
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2009, 11:26:31 AM »
I'll be interested in seeing just how strongly Dear Leader's justice department presses their side of the case.  I don't put it past this dolt to takes sides on an issue in order to goof it up.

.

So then you subscribe to the triple-reverse-Mr.-Spock-300-dimensional-chess-strategy-too-complex-for-mere-mortals-to-comprehend theory?

Offline djones520

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Reputation: +181/-146
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #15 on: June 12, 2009, 04:52:02 PM »
I see no other purpose for gays to wish for "marriage" status except to extract the financial benefits society allows.
That makes it a perfectly valid arguement against.

Can I ask why you wanted "marriage" status then?
"Chuck Norris once had sex in an 18 wheeler. Some of his semen dripped onto the engine. We now call that truck Optimus Prime."

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #16 on: June 12, 2009, 05:13:24 PM »
Can I ask why you wanted "marriage" status then?

Not to offend God.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #17 on: June 12, 2009, 05:14:59 PM »
Can I ask why you wanted "marriage" status then?

Marriage has always been between a man and a woman.
That there are tax and inheritence benefits that a government has assigned to it is not of consequence to the traditional family reasons for heterosexual marriage.

Gays obviously have no use for the traditional and Biblical meanings so what does that leave.

Yes there are people that have lived together for a long time and eventually do marry for those reasons but even in doing it still hasn`t corrupted the entire reasons for marriage between a man and woman.

And btw not married.....women don`t give me the time of day. :p

Offline PatriotGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4285
  • Reputation: +227/-96
  • Look at my BIG feet! Woof!
Re: Obama defends DOMA in federal court- Heads explode
« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2009, 06:21:54 PM »
Quote
Gays have no constitutional right to marriage, or recognition of their marriages by other states:

Quote
nichomachus (1000+ posts)      Fri Jun-12-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes he did
Remember -- the buck stops with him. What the **** -- do you think some underling wrote it and sabotaged Obama with it? He is responsible for whatever the executive branch does -- that's why they call him the ******* president.

Oh the tragedy, the anger, the hate, the sheer terror of it all - quite juicy if y'all ASSk me!

Welcome to liberal throat cutting and under bus tossing class 101.

Enjoy you asshats!
           ►☼Liberals Are THE Root of ALL Evil!☼◄