ody (1000+ posts) Tue May-26-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Agree, IMO this is a fundamental question re whether inalienable rights exist to protect a minority
against the tyranny of a simple majority.
IMO Jerry Brown was correct in arguing that CA's constitution protected same-sex marriage by its declaration "SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy."
Either all inalienable rights are protected or none are protected.
What about my right to live in a society that does not validate sexual deviancy? What about my inalienable right to live in a society which recognizes normality and shuns the ridiculous?
Every time someone gains a "right" someone else loses a "right". I don't know why it must be assumed only the homosex crowd has a lock on the "rights" claim. Normal moral people have rights too.