Author Topic: Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?  (Read 1424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bluesuiter-Retired

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
  • Reputation: +20/-17
Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?
« on: May 19, 2009, 01:09:45 AM »
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30810070

What we should be doing is implanting a micro IFF chip in every soldier, sailor, Marine, airmen then coding these WARBOTS to NOT fire on anyone/anything having those IFF chips.
America - Love It, or LEAVE

Offline The Ocean

  • Celluloid Freak
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 65
  • Reputation: +12/-3
  • I'm a film fanatic
Re: Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2009, 11:21:36 AM »
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30810070

What we should be doing is implanting a micro IFF chip in every soldier, sailor, Marine, airmen then coding these WARBOTS to NOT fire on anyone/anything having those IFF chips.


What happens if our enemies hack the chips?
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Celluloid-Freaks

Subscribe for FREE on iTunes! Search "Celluloid Freaks"

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2009, 11:27:12 AM »
What happens if our enemies hack the chips?

We activate this other "chip" that had been implanted in them.
Quote
Munich (AZ) - A saudi Arabian inventor has requested a patent for monitoring and even killing of people by implantable chip at the German Patent Office in Munich.

German Patent Office in München.A speaker of the Authority said on Friday, a patent is excluded in this case. Patents on inventions, which offend against morality or public order, would not be granted.


The patent for according to the chip surgically or by injection into the body be brought. In addition to a model A, to serve only to monitor (people) there is also a model B, which has a "Punishment chamber" (inside the chip) as an additional element. These could a toxic tools such as for example cyanide be filled with that will be isolated from the « except if we want to eliminate this person reasons this means in his body is released by remote control via the satellite ».


The applicant justified its application with security issues that about pilgrimage in his arabian country, where people remain occasionally in the country, flee or lost, and threats to the State security by dangerous criminals and terrorists.
Killer Chip


Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2009, 01:33:00 PM »
Well, the first three things that'll happen are that (1) a Friendly will be killed by robots when his or her chip fails, (2) no civilians will approach US forces to give information about the enemy because they know the robots will kill them, and (3) the enemy will abuse prisoners and KIA by cutting out and re-using any chips they can locate to avoid being killed by robots.  The robots will kill a lot of people, some of them actually enemies.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Randy

  • Resident Grouch with a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4244
  • Reputation: +202/-39
  • Odd
Re: Can "The Terminator" Be Far Off?
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2009, 06:02:15 AM »
Nawwww it could never happen..... :o

Cyberdyne
« Last Edit: May 21, 2009, 06:06:23 AM by Randy »