The thing about hate crime legislation is it says one person is more important than another. A white girl with a jealous, mean white ex boyfriend could be raped, tortured, and beaten to death because she doesn't want to get back together with him. Since they're both white, it's not a hate crime. It doesn't matter how much she suffered, how much pain and fear she felt as she expelled her last breath. It doesn't matter if someone overheard him screaming "I hate you, you filthy ****ing slut!" She doesn't rate special consideration because of the simple fact that she was born white and she doesn't sleep with people of the same sex. But, some gay person gets shot in his driveway and it's a hate crime. It might turn out to be an ex lover. It might turn out to be someone he owes a lot of money to. It might turn out to be a case of mistaken identity. It might turn out to be circumstance...wrong place, wrong time. The shooter might not know nor care what this person's sexuality is. But the "evidence", with no investigation whatsoever points to a hate crime because it was reported he was gay after the fact. For all we know, a neighbor could have heard the person shout from the car, "You stole my boyfriend, so I'm going to kill you!" But even if someone shouted "I hate fags!" before pulling the trigger, why is his life more valuable than the woman who died at the hand of someone she knew?
Cindie