http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x245738#246065Oh my.
I'm not sure what to make of this, as the dreamy primitive doesn't discuss the subject on Skins's island (perhaps because the "delete" tool has deleted any such comments, and it appears, vaguely, from another web-site, that the dreamy primitive was in fact mausoleumed, or at least timed-out.
This is from the 9-11 forum, excerpts:
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 05:25 PM
Original message
"The truth is out there...just not on the internet"...
after which a whole bunch of stuff
BeFree (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, a rewrite just for you.
There were no hijackers and two planes were guided remotely into the World Trade Centre. What brought the towers down, however was a “controlled demolition†using explosives planted there at some earlier time by the Bushco owned security company in charge.
The Pentagon was hit by a guided missile after a jet flyover.
Various ruses, including faked mobile phone calls and fraudulent claims of such calls were used to frame the 19 supposed hijackers.
Elements of the US Government engaged in a conspiracy of exceptional complexity protected from failure by Bushco.
Bushco created the 19 supposed hijackers by sending them to flying schools to be seen around Florida and other parts of the US, and flew them out with the Saudi Royal family flight right after 9/11.
Bushco sent experts in to rig the two main towers and WTC7 with sufficient explosives to be sure of bringing the first two buildings down some time after the planes had hit them, and WTC7 whenever it was felt expedient to do so.
The planes were guided into exact locations away from the explosives so that the crash did not set them off.
The towers had to come down because if they didn't the evidence of remote controlled airliners would be found out as soon as the fires went out.
BeFree (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The set up
NORAD had an exercise that day that put confusion in the air so that the remote controlled airliners could do their deed without recognition by innocent ATC people. Military aircraft such as an AWAC were in the air and even one general admitted he was in the air that day, so complete command and control were available over top secret communications.
Cheney was at the command center in DC and Bush at a photo op in Florida where he sat motionless even after the first jet had hit the first tower and the military knew it was a 'hijacked' jet. Bush, even claimed to have seen the first jet crash. "Must have been a bad pilot" he said.
The ruse of the FBI field agents reporting on people who wanted to learn to fly passenger jets was just that, a ruse to frame and indict the '19 hijackers'.
Phone calls from the 'hijacked' airliners were used to further frame the 19, but no real evidence has ever been presented to confirm that the calls actually came from the airplanes. It was taken on faith that the calls were made.
Bushco members were in charge of security at the WTC. A Bush family member was an officer of the company. It was during this time that the explosives were planted. There was no concern for a controlled demolition in the business sense because they didn't care about ancillary damage.
BeFree (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush Knew?
On August 6, 2001, the CIA briefed the resident that alerts had come in that OBL was going to use airliners to crash into US buildings.
That was a ruse to set up OBL as the culprit.
Anyway, no action was taken by anyone to stop it from happening. No public warnings, no FAA warnings, no action was taken.
On 9/11 a scheduled release of the hand counts of the Florida 2000 election was to have taken place. Those findings had found that Gore was the actual winner.
Just days before Sec. Rumsfeld had stated that the pentagon had lost 2 trillion dollars.
BeFree (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The aftermath
Firemen made it to the scene of the first crash and radioed in that the fire could be controlled.
Videos of the towers falling showed squibs of explosions coming from many floors below the crash floors in what has been determined to be equipment floors.
Parts of the towers flew away from the buildings as if propelled.
Explosive sounds were heard at the base of the towers.
The towers fell as no towers ever had except due to explosives being used.
None of the black boxes from the jets were ever found even tho the debris was well searched.
At the pentagon no warnings were issued even tho the military knew 'hijacked' jets had already been used as missiles that day. Air defenses stationed on the roof were never used. Rumsfeld was unavailable even tho his office had taken over control of air defenses in the US. But he was at the pentagon.
The alleged airplane that hit the pentagon performed aeronautical maneuvers that experienced pilots claimed were next to impossible for anyone but the most experienced.
BeFree (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, that's my take on it after many hours of reading.
But I have kept an open mind to alternatives, and if anyone has one to present, I'll read it. Thanks.
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Tue May-05-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thank you for collecting all your nonsense into 4 posts...
It'll make it so much easier to find in the future.
After which the dreamy primitive launches aspersions of character and insults upon fellow primitives, those comments being deleted.
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Wed May-06-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. I believe SLAD has set a new record....for the most deleted subthreads.
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Wed May-06-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. I see ALL my pertinent replies are still here would you like to defend your OP now or are you going to again try and derail this into something other than your OP, thus trying to deflect from the criticism of you OP that is so richly deserved. And causing over 100 replies to be deleted.
I am certainly ready to go one on one with you on the subject of YOUR OP, anytime anywhere, YOU name it Sid I am ready
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Wed May-06-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. You're the one that caused the deletions, SLAD....
your deflection is hysterical.
Lithos (1000+ posts) Thu May-07-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
85. Locking
I am distinctly tired of this thread. It has been a long time since I have loathed a thread as much as I have this one. I do not tire of it for the topic, but because of what it has become.
From the rules:
3. Civility: Treat other members with respect. Do not post personal attacks against other members of this discussion forum.
Avail yourself of the tools here to control your user experience. If you find that you are spending more time attacking people or spending extra calories and time just to essentially annoy someone, then I would suggest strongly to take a break.
Lithos
DU Moderator
And then one goes to the dysmenopausal Kansas school teacher's other hangout, and there's this, where earlier the recently mausoleumed leftshick primitive had mentioned the dreamy primitive was encountering, uh, problems with management of Skins's island:
http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=243&topic_id=244seemslikeadream
Member since Sep 14th 2005
3547 posts
Thu May-07-09 07:30 PM
In response to Reply #7
what a bunch of loosers can't handle the truth good riddens to bad rubbish, please tell all my dear friends there I love them dearly and will never forget them.
Anybody know what gives? The deleted comments are some, uh, missing pieces here.
For the record, I never paid much attention to the primitives inhabiting the 9-11 forum, and so there's probably a lot more going on, that I don't see here.
