Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
bridgit (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:31 AMOriginal message Barney Frank interrupted Geitner suggesting people in the back of the room lower their signs Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 10:33 AM by bridgitPanning to a group of Code Pinker's, he suggested further the need for a serious review of the issue before them and the need for people to grow up. Is he right (to have) done so and suggested such a thing as growing up?
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:33 AMResponse to Original message 1. Frankly, I agree with him. We can express ourselves without this now. I think Code Pink tactics need to change with the times.
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:33 AMResponse to Original message 2. Yes, he's right. I'm embarrassed for the Pinkers.
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 11:45 AMResponse to Reply #8 57. Democracy or even our Democratic Republic is NOT a finishing school. The rancorous the BETTER. I love it! Congress has ****ed up our country also and they need to be constantly CHECKING themselves. No, I don't want any congress critter to be TOO COMFORTABLE.God Bless Code Pink!
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:35 AMResponse to Original message 6. He's right. They do more damage than good with their silliness.
grytpype (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:39 AMResponse to Original message 10. I'm sick of Code Pink and all other attention whores. It served a purpose when Bush was in the White House and no one was questioning him, but that time has passed.
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 11:24 AMResponse to Reply #30 41. Not at all Protesting outside a building is one thing. Disrupting a meeting at which important matters of national security are being discussed is irresponsible.It would be the same difference between nurses picketing outside a hospital and nurses picketing inside an operating room.
cali (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 10:50 AMResponse to Reply #21 24. no, the people are not allowed to disrupt a Congressional hearing I don't support that whatever the cause. I don't support it if it's anti-choicers or CP. Stand there and hold your signs. Fine. Disrupt and take the consequences. And no, it's not always the people that force the issues in this country. It's quite frequently those in elected office or in positions of leadership
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 11:19 AMResponse to Reply #34 37. One might say Code Pink's attitude proves that they don't care about anything but attention
cali (1000+ posts) Tue Mar-24-09 11:26 AMResponse to Reply #34 42. lol. since when is CP "the people"? Because they say so? They're supported by a tiny minority. The majority don't have any interest in them and certainly don't support them. Sorry, they don't have any more of a right to disrupt a hearing than some right to life group.
Might? Holy shit, genius--how long did it take for YOU to figure that out?
There's a thin line between 1/19/09 and 1/20/09.
Actually there's been a lot of anti-Code Pink on DU for a while now, well before Obama took office.