Here we go again.............
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2835826SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Original message
If Bush Attacks Iran
would it partly be Mrs. Clinton's fault for supporting (Kyl/LIEberman) what in essence to the Bush Administration's thinking is an authorization for use of force. Or...would she deny having ANY IDEA that they would use it as such? Does anyone know how Obama voted on that bill?
Windy (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely! I went to a lecture given by Scott Ritter and others
He thinks Bush will do it either in June or in the fall. He believes that it will be massive airstrikes launched from inside Iraq... to comply with the language of Kyl/Lieberman.
Which June or fall??
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. and
would or SHOULD she be partly to blame if it happens
Stupid Windy............didn't you notice this was a bash Hitley thread
Windy (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, she should! no question. n/t
indepat (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Wonder if any retaliation (terraist attack(s)) should be anticipated in response to such massive
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:15 PM by indepat
air strikes and wonder if such massive air strikes would likely produce any collateral damage? Moreover, would such massive air strikes and any anticipated retaliatory response likely create the conditions for martial law being invoked, the 23+ thousand brown-type shirts being sicked on the public, and national elections being canceled, thus the official crowning of King and Emperor Junior. Naw, surely they would not do that, but such would be enough to make one wonder.
Edited to add word
Oh on to martial law, cancelled elections and Bush being crowned
Windy (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. She made it a point of showing up to vote FOR it!!!
I was going to pass anyway no matter what. She chose to go out of her way to support it.
Evidence of BAD judgment! More of the same from her.
ixion (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would be any congress person who supported the IWR, Kyl / LIEberman and
all the funding resolutions. They are all responsible, because anyone who was paying attention could see what was going on.
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. one has to wonder
what a certain senator from NY's excuse will be THIS time...John Edwards said it would be naive for ANY senator to vote for it with knowing past history
Windy (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. another disgusting POLITICAL vote that could potentially cost lives
both american and iranian...and maybe more if the war extends beyond the borders of Iran/Iraq!
Texas Explorer (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've decided that they are all just one large and powerful
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:10 PM by Texas Explorer
entity that has an agenda that we have little say in. The rest is semantics.
What a bunch IDJITS
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-08-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think Biden and others
have effectively prevented us from starting this with their threats of impeachment.
Israel is going to start it instead, although the plan (or hope) may be to drag us into it. Just listen to that freak show John Bolton
.
well do we start the bets on which year in June or the Fall??
