« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed  (Read 2045 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jinxmchue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3841
  • Reputation: +114/-26
Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« on: February 28, 2009, 01:42:00 PM »
It's factual, accurate and sourced.  Unfortunately, it flies directly in the face of the hoard of liberals on Wikipedia that believe in this "Dominionism" garbage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominionism&diff=273947757&oldid=272643476

So, within a few minutes?  Within the hour?  A few hours?  Tomorrow?  Within a couple days?  Within a week?
Logged

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2009, 02:11:03 PM »
Looks like it was already undone.

(cur) (prev)  19:50, 28 February 2009 Mike Doughney (Talk | contribs) (38,640 bytes) (Undid revision 273947757 by 67.135.49.198 (talk) opinion pieces are not reliable sources) (undo)
(cur) (prev)  19:39, 28 February 2009 67.135.49.198 (Talk) (39,222 bytes) (undo)
Logged

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2009, 06:10:59 PM »
It's probably the fister, he lives for Wiki.
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2009, 08:49:38 PM »
Quote from: Bondai on February 28, 2009, 06:10:59 PM
It's probably the fister, he lives for Wiki.

I wondered myself, but it's my impression Fat Che "gave up" on wikipedia a couple of years ago.

Or so Fat Che alleged he did.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline jinxmchue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3841
  • Reputation: +114/-26
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2009, 11:27:04 PM »
Quote from: thundley4 on February 28, 2009, 02:11:03 PM
Looks like it was already undone.

(cur) (prev)  19:50, 28 February 2009 Mike Doughney (Talk | contribs) (38,640 bytes) (Undid revision 273947757 by 67.135.49.198 (talk) opinion pieces are not reliable sources) (undo)
(cur) (prev)  19:39, 28 February 2009 67.135.49.198 (Talk) (39,222 bytes) (undo)


HA!  Nice excuse, too.  Never mind that the rest of the article is filled with "opinion pieces."

Oh, and this is hilariously priceless: one of the sources I cited IS USED LATER ON IN THE ARTICLE!
« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 11:28:42 PM by jinxmchue »
Logged

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2009, 12:05:04 AM »
Quote from: franksolich on February 28, 2009, 08:49:38 PM
I wondered myself, but it's my impression Fat Che "gave up" on wikipedia a couple of years ago.

Or so Fat Che alleged he did.

Hey Coach, what exactly is this about? It would help if someone would explain this shit!
Logged
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2009, 05:49:42 PM »
Quote from: AllosaursRus on March 01, 2009, 12:05:04 AM
Hey Coach, what exactly is this about? It would help if someone would explain this shit!

For at least a couple of years, maybe longer, Fat Che, the now-exiled "Ben Burch" primitive from Skins's island, dominated discussions in vast sections of wikipedia, also allegedly using sockpuppets.

Fat Che is no Abraham Lincoln when it comes to being honest.

wikipedia entries are determined by "the collective" arguing with each other; never mind if one doesn't know excresence about what he's talking about.

Fat Che's big crusades over there were to (a) get freerepublic out of it, (b) keep Fat Che (as an individual) in it, (c) keep Fat Che's "White Rose" Society in it, and (d) keep W. Andrew Stephenson (as an individual) in it.

Ultimately, Fat Che failed in (a), (b), (c), and (d), but it took a long time.

Fat Che meddled in a lot of things over there; one sort of got the impression he was the owner of wikipedia.  He wasn't very popular, as rectal apertures rarely are.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »