Author Topic: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face  (Read 2365 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bijou

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8937
  • Reputation: +336/-26
Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« on: February 26, 2009, 03:25:35 PM »
Quote
By Debra Saunders

A couple of years ago, when speaking to a local group, I mentioned that The Chronicle was losing money. A couple in the back of the room rudely applauded. How thrilled those two must have felt when -- if -- they learned of San Francisco Chronicle Publisher Frank Vega's announcement Tuesday that the Hearst Corp. will implement "significant" workforce cuts. If the cuts don't pay off, then the Hearst Corp. will "offer the newspaper for sale or close it altogether."

Bloggers and e-mailers are crowing. If The Chronicle is shuttered, they'll be dancing a jig. Many conservatives feel a warm glow at the possible demise of an institution that they believe to be failing because of liberal bias. On the far left, that same glow will satisfy those who think newspapers are not liberal enough.

 As for those who only read their news online, here's a news flash: News stories do not sprout up like Jack's beanstalk on the Internet. To produce news, you need professionals who understand the standards needed to research, report and write on what happened. If newspapers die, reliable information dries up.

Reduced ad revenue and falling newspaper circulation mean that there will be fewer people to cover the same number of stories. In the middle of an economic crisis and President Obama's federal spending bonanza, there will be fewer watchdogs to guard the shop.

So, to those of you who argue that the demise of liberal newspapers (The Chronicle in particular) is deserved, I offer a caveat: Be careful what you wish for.

...
link

Smell the fear of the MSM.



Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2009, 03:31:06 PM »
Meh....the same story here with the Kansas City (red) Star......stock was just delisted when it fell to 0.67 per share......if they don't report the unbiased truth, who needs them.....

doc
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2009, 03:33:34 PM »
Meh....the same story here with the Kansas City (red) Star......stock was just delisted when it fell to 0.67 per share......if they don't report the unbiased truth, who needs them.....

doc

I already left a comment at FR.

Newspapers do not offer reliable info. They are not watchdogs of O. They are leghumpers.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2009, 03:37:32 PM »
Quote
As for those who only read their news online, here's a news flash: News stories do not sprout up like Jack's beanstalk on the Internet. To produce news, you need professionals who understand the standards needed to research, report and write on what happened.

Well, yes, that's very true, and that's something that bothers me about the demise of the print media.

Quote
If newspapers die, reliable information dries up.

I'm however not so sure about that; contemporary newspapers haven't been providing us with reliable information, it seems, since the late 1950s, when reporters stopped reporting the news and concentrated upon the personalities, such as the obsessive fixation with idolizing the Kennedys.

And then when reporters started becoming "celebrities" themselves, it got worse.

Quote
So, to those of you who argue that the demise of liberal newspapers (The Chronicle in particular) is deserved, I offer a caveat: Be careful what you wish for.

Of course.  One should always be careful.

But damn, it's the print media's own fault.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2009, 03:41:18 PM »

But damn, it's the print media's own fault.

right on. I would h5 you but you own the place.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2009, 03:55:47 PM »
Well, if the 'watchdogs' would stop selling the ****ing chickens they're supposed to be protecting to the wolves, and then bragging about how many they saved and how brave and cunning the wolves are, I might be a little more sympathetic about it.  But getting shot is the fare of bad, useless, or thieving watchdogs. 
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2009, 04:05:20 PM »
Well, if the 'watchdogs' would stop selling the ******* chickens they're supposed to be protecting to the wolves, and then bragging about how many they saved and how brave and cunning the wolves are, I might be a little more sympathetic about it.  But getting shot is the fare of bad, useless, or thieving watchdogs. 

someone should post this, at least partially. we should all watch the video report.

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/Investigation_Homeowners_Hell

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2009, 09:03:50 PM »
Quote
To produce news, you need professionals who understand the standards needed to research, report and write on what happened.

And when J-schools start making those same professionals instead of liberal acolytes, then you might see a reversal of the downward spiral of the MSM.  What you know of standards can be summarized in Das Kapital.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2009, 10:31:29 PM »
Meh....the same story here with the Kansas City (red) Star......stock was just delisted when it fell to 0.67 per share......if they don't report the unbiased truth, who needs them.....

doc

The Rocky Mountain Spews will be publishing it's last edition in Denver tomorrow morning.  The broadcast propaganda networks have been whining and crying about it all day today.   :popcorn: :rotf: :popcorn: :lmao: :popcorn: :fuelfire:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Jim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Reputation: +55/-6
Re: Cutting Off Your News To Spite Your Face
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2009, 10:37:39 PM »
hard to feel badly for the papers, they made their own suicide.
My fellow Americans, there is nothing audacious about hope. Hope is what makes people buy lottery tickets instead of paying the bills. Hope is for the old gals feeding the slots in Atlantic City. It destroys the inner-city kid who quits school because he hopes he'll be a world-famous recording artist.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?

One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

The other kills her own food.