Author Topic: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)  (Read 7577 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #25 on: February 17, 2009, 06:55:14 PM »
He also said the US Military needs to go into PAKISTAN to find Bin Laden.
This is probably the invasion force.

Well we already have Pedators flying from bases in pakistan.............DiFi said so
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #26 on: February 17, 2009, 08:27:05 PM »
his position for a "surge" in afghanistan was a cynical campaign tactic.  he couldn't be against the iraq war and the afghanistan war (and yes, I realize that they are actually battlefields of the same larger GWOT), so he oppounistically came out in favor of a surge in afghanistan so he didn't look like a pacifist, and now he's stuck with it.

I don't think a surge will work in afghanistan.  it strikes me that was the lesson that the soviets learned in the 80s.  not that the US millitary wouldn't do it differently, but given the terrain, the culture, and the abject lack of any central authority in the history of that forsaken country, I don't see how a surge could work.  not to mention that fact that it's a pile of rocks.




 

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #27 on: February 17, 2009, 08:38:17 PM »
his position for a "surge" in afghanistan was a cynical campaign tactic.  he couldn't be against the iraq war and the afghanistan war (and yes, I realize that they are actually battlefields of the same larger GWOT), so he oppounistically came out in favor of a surge in afghanistan so he didn't look like a pacifist, and now he's stuck with it.

I don't think a surge will work in afghanistan.  it strikes me that was the lesson that the soviets learned in the 80s.  not that the US millitary wouldn't do it differently, but given the terrain, the culture, and the abject lack of any central authority in the history of that forsaken country, I don't see how a surge could work.  not to mention that fact that it's a pile of rocks THEIR pile of rocks.




 

What are the odds that a surge of 17,000 battlefield engineering troops engaged in building a wall around the perimeter of that Godforsaken rock pile might be more effective than 17,000 more combat troops in-country might?
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #28 on: February 17, 2009, 09:17:27 PM »
Not a word.  Where is Cindy Sheehan?  Has she reacted to this breaking story yet?

Damn. Just damn. You could've gone all WEEK and not said that skank's name.  :censored:
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #29 on: February 17, 2009, 09:55:53 PM »
his position for a "surge" in afghanistan was a cynical campaign tactic.  he couldn't be against the iraq war and the afghanistan war (and yes, I realize that they are actually battlefields of the same larger GWOT), so he oppounistically came out in favor of a surge in afghanistan so he didn't look like a pacifist, and now he's stuck with it.

I don't think a surge will work in afghanistan.  it strikes me that was the lesson that the soviets learned in the 80s.  not that the US millitary wouldn't do it differently, but given the terrain, the culture, and the abject lack of any central authority in the history of that forsaken country, I don't see how a surge could work.  not to mention that fact that it's a pile of rocks.

The difference is in the soilder...............when the Soviets had the Spetsnaz in Afghanistan they where kicking ass...............when te Army rolled in they were mostly conscripts.....................ie failure times 10.

The US has all volunteers and a much more superior game plan..............I just hope the messiah doesn't **** that up
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2009, 10:31:16 PM »
The difference is in the soilder...............when the Soviets had the Spetsnaz in Afghanistan they where kicking ass...............when te Army rolled in they were mostly conscripts.....................ie failure times 10.

The US has all volunteers and a much more superior game plan..............I just hope the messiah doesn't **** that up

One other point is that showing initiative was highly discouraged in the Soviet Army.  It is highly encouraged in the US military.

That makes a world of difference.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2009, 10:44:19 PM »
What are the odds that a surge of 17,000 battlefield engineering troops engaged in building a wall around the perimeter of that Godforsaken rock pile might be more effective than 17,000 more combat troops in-country might?

I think the place is lawless and ungovernable.  and I think there is a possibility that the best we can hope for is to keep them disorganized and and on the run for several years to come.

and that is probably good enough.  you can't very well plot another 9/11 when you are dodging predator strikes.
 

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #32 on: February 18, 2009, 06:06:30 AM »
I think the place is lawless and ungovernable.  and I think there is a possibility that the best we can hope for is to keep them disorganized and and on the run for several years to come.

and that is probably good enough.  you can't very well plot another 9/11 when you are dodging predator strikes.
 
They could turn a couple of those piles of rocks into glow-in-the-dark glass too, but Uncle Zero would pee himself before giving that order.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2009, 06:30:13 AM »
How interesting...my Liberal Rag paper had this widdle story
on page A7. Two tiny paragraphs. I'm shocked they didn't put
it in the Help Wanted Section.  :whatever:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2009, 06:37:14 AM »
How interesting...my Liberal Rag paper had this widdle story
on page A7. Two tiny paragraphs. I'm shocked they didn't put it in the Help Wanted Section.  :whatever:

Speaking of.....just out of curiosity, how many daily newspapers does St. Louis have any more?

I'm really concerned about this--I fully expect Time magazine to go under this year.  And even the Omaha World-Herald, once the pearl of the Great Plains (but not lately), has been hurting really badly.

And Seattle soon to be with no dailies at all.

It's all their own fault, but one dislikes seeing it happen.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Obama approves troop increase in Afghanistan (17K)
« Reply #35 on: February 18, 2009, 07:28:10 AM »
Speaking of.....just out of curiosity, how many daily newspapers does St. Louis have any more?

I'm really concerned about this--I fully expect Time magazine to go under this year.  And even the Omaha World-Herald, once the pearl of the Great Plains (but not lately), has been hurting really badly.

And Seattle soon to be with no dailies at all.

It's all their own fault, but one dislikes seeing it happen.
The tv news interviewed the "leadership" of our local newsrag a few days ago.  He blamed a serious drop in advertising on the economy even though their advertising sales have been dropping for about 5-6 years.  He blamed a drop in subscriptions on the innerwebz.  Of course the fact that it's a liberl rag couldn't be a problem.   ::)
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.