« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel  (Read 3159 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« on: February 09, 2009, 06:04:41 PM »


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,489590,00.html

 :thatsright:

Quote
Navy Takes Off Fuel, Water, People to Lighten Missile Cruiser
Sunday, February 08, 2009 

Feb. 6: The USS Port Royal, right, a Navy guided missile cruiser, sits grounded atop a reef about a half-mile south of the Honolulu airport.
HONOLULU  —  The Navy offloaded fuel, water and personnel from a grounded, $1 billion guided missile cruiser so tugboats and a salvage ship can try again early Sunday morning to free it from a rock and sand shoal.

The USS Port Royal ran aground on Thursday evening, about a half-mile south of the Honolulu airport where it was visible from several vantage points on Oahu.

No one was injured and no oil or other contaminants have leaked, said representatives of the Navy and Coast Guard, as well as state officials.

At a press conference, Rear Admiral Joseph Walsh, deputy commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, said the ship is structurally sound. But he added that a thick, underwater rubber encasement that surrounds sonar equipment at the bow has taken on seawater.

A barge received fuel and fresh water from the Port Royal on Saturday, which Walsh said should make the grounded vessel approximately 200 tons lighter. The 9,600-ton warship will also be an additional 15 tons lighter because half the crew of 360 is on shore.

Another reason for moving half the crew was that the ship's air conditioning was not functioning because the vent through which seawater is drawn to cool the system is blocked as the ship sits on the shoal, Walsh said.

snip :thatsright:
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 06:51:58 PM by TxRadioguy »
Logged
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2009, 06:10:45 PM »
I know a Navy Captain that has some 'plainin to do.
Logged
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline RightCoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3438
  • Reputation: +185/-24
  • Semper Fi means more than most will ever know
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2009, 06:17:57 PM »
Quote from: rich_t on February 09, 2009, 06:10:45 PM
I know a Navy Captain that has some 'plainin to do.

You mean a "high-ranking" supply clerk has some splainin' to do.
Logged
nine eleven is a car
nine one one is an emergency service
September 11, 2001 was an attack
Never Forget, or Minimize.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2009, 06:41:43 PM »
Quote from: RightCoast on February 09, 2009, 06:17:57 PM
You mean a "high-ranking" supply clerk has some splainin' to do.

You mean the high ranking head cleaner in Adak has some splainin; to do
Logged
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline lars1701c

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
  • Reputation: +24/-28
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2009, 07:01:07 PM »
lol

Betcha some heads will be rolling after this.  :-)


Thought they taught  you squids that reefs are "bad" and not to go near them?
Logged
"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
~~~ The late Dr. Adrian Rogers , 1931 to 2005

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2009, 07:55:52 PM »
Quote from: lars1701c on February 09, 2009, 07:01:07 PM
lol

Betcha some heads will be rolling after this.  :-)


Thought they taught  you squids that reefs are "bad" and not to go near them?

Never been to Bali have ya.........
Logged
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2009, 08:57:34 AM »

pretty standard . . .
Quote
Commander relieved: The commanding officer of the USS Port Royal, the $1 billion warship that ran aground along the coast of Honolulu, has been relieved of duty, the Navy said Monday. Rear Adm. Dixon R. Smith, commander of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, relieved Capt. John Carroll of his duties pending the results of an investigation into Thursday's incident. The Navy on Monday freed the vessel, which was slightly damaged.

 . .  and the port royal had just gotten out of the yard after four months of maintenance, and ran aground after her first day of sea trials.   :thatsright:



Logged

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2009, 10:20:25 AM »
Just what the Navy always wanted, a billion dollar guided missile cruiser with cellulite.
Logged
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2009, 10:55:08 AM »

I thought that name sounded familiar.  the port royal was modified for ballistic missile defense, along with the USS lake erie, which became famous last year for shooting down that defective satellite.

Logged

Offline ironhorsedriver

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 533
  • Reputation: +28/-1
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2009, 08:39:29 PM »
The Captain has definitely lost his job. As I remember, when the Enterprise ran aground in Chesapeake Bay, he was relieved about the time the brow went over. I imagine the Navigator is looking into his Civilan Career options.
Whoever had the deck may get off with a reprimand, but I'd say his efficiency report will not be good.
Logged

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2009, 09:20:25 PM »
Quote from: rich_t on February 09, 2009, 06:10:45 PM
I know a Navy Captain that has some 'plainin to do.

Do they use Pilots in the USN like they do for civilian ships?  'cause if they do, it is on that dude.
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2009, 09:22:24 PM »
Quote from: ironhorsedriver on February 10, 2009, 08:39:29 PM
The Captain has definitely lost his job. As I remember, when the Enterprise ran aground in Chesapeake Bay, he was relieved about the time the brow went over. I imagine the Navigator is looking into his Civilan Career options.
Whoever had the deck may get off with a reprimand, but I'd say his efficiency report will not be good.


Was that the one where they had all hands get on deck to counterbalance and free her?  IIRC is is a classic picture...
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2009, 09:26:21 PM »
Quote from: freedumb2003 on February 10, 2009, 09:20:25 PM
Do they use Pilots in the USN like they do for civilian ships?  'cause if they do, it is on that dude.


the CO has already been relieved "pending the results of an investigation" . . . which is shorthand for "you're dead, just not buried yet".

Logged

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2009, 09:28:33 PM »
Quote from: Wretched Excess on February 10, 2009, 09:26:21 PM
the CO has already been relieved "pending the results of an investigation" . . . which is shorthand for "you're dead, just not buried yet".



It is always good to have people who know the code...

Any idea how this happened?  It seems like a pretty avoidable error...

Seriously.
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +363/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Waters unclear for Navy Vessel
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2009, 10:17:36 AM »
Running aground IS avoidable. That is why the CO of a ship gets relieved, regardless of who was at the helm. The CO bears the ultimate responsibility for EVERYTHING that happens aboard HIS ship, good OR bad. The people at fault will also suffer some sort of disciplinary action, from the Officer of the Deck to the helmsman.
Logged
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »