Author Topic: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal  (Read 1124 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5208
  • Reputation: +1224/-29
Quote
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts)        Mon Feb-09-09 05:09 PM
Original message
If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal 
Can you imagine if a Republican president had been in charge when America needed the New Deal?

Here are just some ideas of where we'd be today:

1. Mexico would be passing anti-immigration laws to keep Americans out
2. Debtor's prison would be a reality today (bankruptcy would be a crime against the Constitution)
3. Homeless would be required to go to a Evangelical Church service before getting food and/or shelter
4. Women would have lost the right to vote, could not go to school and would be required to serve in convents until they were married (unless they came from wealthy families)
5. We would have lords, barons and royalty who's wealth came from serfs and indentured servants

Please feel free to add to this list.


 :mental:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8182409

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2009, 04:54:16 PM »
these people are morons

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2009, 05:06:56 PM »
these people are morons

FGL, that's an insult to morons.  They're below idiots.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2009, 05:42:32 PM »
Quote
Mexico would be passing anti-immigration laws to keep Americans out

Have you even checked the Mexican immigration laws you dumb ****?  They already do that.

Quote
Homeless would be required to go to a Evangelical Church service before getting food and/or shelter

Fine...  Go hungry and not eat the food donated by the goodness of other's hearts.

If I were truely hungry or needed a place to spend the night, I would gladly endure listening to an Al Gore "global warming" speech in exchange.

But your problem you cocksuker... is that you want shit handed to you for free and expect others to just suck it up and give it to you.

Go pound salt you sorry waste of air.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 05:47:16 PM by rich_t »
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2009, 05:55:34 PM »
Quote
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts)        Mon Feb-09-09 05:09 PM
Original message
If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal 


There wouldn't have been a New Deal if it had been Republicans in charge.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12329
  • Reputation: +1266/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2009, 05:57:32 PM »
Nice to know the Republicans have gained power as the minority players.  Wooo Hooo for us!!

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5575
  • Reputation: +237/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2009, 06:49:39 PM »
Nice to know the Republicans have gained power as the minority players.  Wooo Hooo for us!!

KC

Don't celebrate..................republicans balls and spines are the kenny's of Southpark fame
You got off your ass, now get your wife off her back.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15765
  • Reputation: +1737/-170
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2009, 06:51:56 PM »
We would have been out of the depression in 1935?

Yep.

Can't wait for the nest war to get the democrats out of a financial quagmire...and how many millions dead.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12329
  • Reputation: +1266/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2009, 07:25:24 PM »
Don't celebrate..................republicans balls and spines are the kenny's of Southpark fame

Well, I meant Wooo Hooo as in; These idiots don't understand the Republicans don't have the power to do shit right now yet they want to blame it on them.

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline MrsSmith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5977
  • Reputation: +465/-54
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2009, 07:30:13 PM »
Quote
Mexico would be passing anti-immigration laws to keep Americans out

As rich pointed out, they've done that.  Mexico has much harsher immigration laws.

Quote
Debtor's prison would be a reality today

And what is it called when an estranged father is shoved into prison for falling behind in child support?  I know we all love to hate "deadbeat dads," but many of those punished have fallen behind due to unemployment or health problems.


Quote
Homeless would be required to go to a Evangelical Church service before getting food and/or shelter

As most homeless are currently sheltered and fed by churches, nothing would be different.  You "liberals" would still be hanging onto your wallets with fierce greed.


Quote
Women would have lost the right to vote, could not go to school and would be required to serve in convents until they were married

 :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :rotf: :rotf:  


Quote
We would have lords, barons and royalty who's wealth came from serfs and indentured servants
  :o :o I thought we had that now!!  Just ask UP, she'll educate you!!   :-)



We would have been out of the depression in 1935?

Yep.

Yep.   :clap:
.
.


Antifa - the only fascists in America today.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14601
  • Reputation: +2298/-76
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2009, 07:30:46 PM »
Some info on Hoover from wiki:

Quote from:
After his successful election in November 1928, Hoover entered office with a plan for reform of the nation's regulatory system. A dedicated Progressive and Reformer, Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for improving the conditions of all Americans by regulation and by encouraging volunteerism. Long before he entered politics he denounced laissez-faire thinking. As Commerce Secretary he had taken an active pro-regulation stance. As President, he helped push tariff and farm subsidy bills through Congress.

Hoover expanded civil service coverage of Federal positions, canceled private oil leases on government lands, ... He appointed a commission which set aside 3 million acres  of national parks and 2.3 million acres of national forests; advocated tax reduction for low-income Americans; closed certain tax loopholes for the wealthy; doubled the number of veteran's hospital facilities; wrote a Children's Charter that advocated protection of every child regardless of race or gender....

Sounds like a libs wet dream.

Quote from:
Hoover's well as the economy were put to the test with the onset of The Great Depression. At the outset of the Depression, Hoover claims in his memoirs that he rejected Treasury Secretary Mellon's suggested "leave-it-alone" approach. Critics, such as liberal economist Paul Krugman, on the other hand, accuse Hoover of sharing Mellon's laissez-faire viewpoint.  His policies, however, had little or no effect. As the economy quickly deteriorated in the early years of the Great Depression, Hoover declined to pursue legislative relief, believing that it would make people dependent on the federal government. Instead, he organized a number of voluntary measures with businesses, encouraged state and local government responses, and accelerated federal building projects. Only toward the end of his term did he support a series of legislative solutions.

So Krugman's a noted lair on Hoover.  Anyone surprised??

Quote from:
Congress approved the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930. The legislation, which raised tariffs on thousands of imported items, was signed into law by President Hoover in June 1930. The intent of the Act was to encourage the purchase of American-made products by increasing the cost of imported goods, while raising revenue for the federal government and protecting farmers. However, economic depression now spread through much of the world, and other nations increased tariffs on American-made goods in retaliation, reducing international trade, and worsening the Depression.

Quote from:
In order to pay for these and other government programs, Hoover agreed to one of the largest tax increases in American history. The Revenue Act of 1932 raised income tax on the highest incomes from 25% to 63%. The estate tax was doubled and corporate taxes were raised by almost 15%. Hoover also encouraged Congress to investigate the New York Stock Exchange, and this pressure resulted in various reforms.

National debt expressed as a fraction of gross national product climbs from 20% to 40% under Hoover. Franklin D. Roosevelt blasted the Republican incumbent for spending and taxing too much, increasing national debt, raising tariffs and blocking trade, as well as placing millions on the dole of the government. Roosevelt attacked Hoover for "reckless and extravagant" spending, of thinking "that we ought to center control of everything in Washington as rapidly as possible," and of leading "the greatest spending administration in peacetime in all of history." Roosevelt's running mate, John Nance Garner, accused the Republican of "leading the country down the path of socialism".

FDR condemning Hoover of thinking "that we ought to center control of everything in Washington as rapidly as possible," and of leading "the greatest spending administration in peacetime in all of history"??  FDR's running mate accusing someone else of "leading the country down the path of socialism"???

HA!!

.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 07:32:59 PM by USA4ME »
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline crockspot

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1985
  • Reputation: +80/-7
  • Bite me, libs.
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2009, 11:50:30 AM »
Quote
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts)        Mon Feb-09-09 05:09 PM
Original message
If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
Can you imagine if a Republican president had been in charge when America needed the New Deal?

Here are just some ideas of where we'd be today:

1. The Great Depression would have been over by 1934

Please feel free to add to this list.

Fixed!

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58706
  • Reputation: +3082/-173
Re: If Republicans had been in charge when America needed FDR's New Deal
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2009, 02:17:09 PM »
Some info on Hoover:

In the 1928 presidential race, Herbert Hoover was considered the "liberal" candidate, and the Democrat Alfred E. Nuema--er, Smith, was considered the "conservative" candidate.

I kid you not; it's in all the history books.
apres moi, le deluge