Repukes Are Politicizing Terrorism Again and Are Seemingly Hoping For...........

[Crazy Horse]

Repukes Are Politicizing Terrorism Again and Are Seemingly Hoping For Another Attack

 

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8142453

tekisui  (1000+ posts)        Mon Jan-26-09 12:57 PM
Original message
Repukes Are Politicizing Terrorism Again and Are Seemingly Hoping For Another Attack 
 Advertisements [?]The RWers are out with their latest politicization of terror meme. They are trying to lay the foundation that Obama's efforts to improve our standing in the world are going to cause terrorism. They are attempting to lay the blame on Obama for any future attacks, which they are frothing at the mouth to occur. They seem to be anxiously and giddily awaiting an event that will cause mass casualties on American soil so they can quickly denounce the President.

These are sick, sick people. Chimpy ignored the intelligence warnings of his terrorist attacks. He prevented the CIA and FBI from connecting the dots with his ignorance. Then, he set in place policies for 7 years that served as a recruiting tool for extremists around the world. America stood united, not behind chimpy, but with each other in defiance. We were not going to allow some murderous thugs to destroy America. Chimpy, however, worked tirelessly for the next 7 years to destroy us.

If the unspeakable happens again, the RWers are already playing their hand. They are with the terrorists. They are already terrorizing the living rooms of middle America, repeatedly telling them to be afraid, be very afraid. They want us to be hit, so they can divide us.

They are sick.

 
WTF 

Six days and they have completely rewritten history.

Just embers at this moment

[Rebel]

...and without conservatives bring this shit to the front, they'll succeed.


DEMOCRAT policies prevented the CIA and FBI from sharing information, you f'n jackasses.  

[JohnnyReb]

What's her face?????......Jamie Gorelick....or something like that.

[Carl]

Sometimes it is all one can do to not wish that they would all just die.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Expecting the worst because the country is being run by unskilled-but-delusional labor is not the same thing as politicizing terror. 

[Peter3_1]

The dumpster divers just ignore facts , and vomit their bile, over and over and over. Hell, most would accept a breakfast invitation to "Windows on the World" to this very day!  Jackass is a singularly appropriate symbol, isn't it?

[Redstatecka]

tekisui  (1000+ posts)        Mon Jan-26-09 12:57 PM
Original message
Repukes Are Politicizing Terrorism Again and Are Seemingly Hoping For Another Attack 
 Advertisements [?]The RWers are out with their latest politicization of terror meme. They are trying to lay the foundation that Obama's efforts to improve our standing in the world are going to cause terrorism. They are attempting to lay the blame on Obama for any future attacks, which they are frothing at the mouth to occur. They seem to be anxiously and giddily awaiting an event that will cause mass casualties on American soil so they can quickly denounce the President.

Non-Democrats, non-liberals and non-leftists are "repoliticizing terrorism again"? New flash, ace: It's always been political.

And we're just praying that Obama and his advisers don't screw things up so there is another attack on U.S. soil.

What he just did with Gitmo and the "horrific" torture tools could not have sent a positive message to the terrorists, though, about how we plan on standing.

Nor could Obama's immediate announcement of withdrawal on date almost-certain from Iraq.

And, yes, given that President Bush kept us from any terror attacks after 9/11, we will blame Obama that occur during his time in office, which we all hope will be llimited to just one term.

And as for frothing at the mouth for such attacks to occur? What kind of simple-minded, hateful, insecure, ignorant person would say something like that?

That's right: A Democrat, liberal or leftist.

Who, it appears, can't fathom that if there's an attack on American soil, we and/or our loved ones and friends and neighbors, of whatever political stripe or color or sex or religion, might get hurt or killed in such attacks.

[AllosaursRus]

These morons are "hoping" the "change" in leadership will not get us another 9/11!

That's their hope and change!

If it happens, they know they will be TOAST, and so will be their savior!

[jukin]

The only silver lining is it will be big liberal city that takes the blow. 

[Peter3_1]

Mebby so, but I live downwind from NYC, and lost one good friend on 9-11 , not to mention an aquaintance or  two and three thousand fellow citizens. That was more than enough.

I don't want any crap from an attack blowing this way, and I don't want any more friends and/or Americans to die needlessly here. I want islamofascists to die suddenly where THEY live.

[Redstatecka]

The only silver lining is it will be big liberal city that takes the blow.

No silver there.

No Americans, regardless of their political stupidity or naivete, their intellectual bankruptcy, whatever -- including having cast a vote for Obama -- deserve to die because of Obama's and his administration's ineptness and apparent weakness.

And having lived in some of those cities, I assure you that not everyone there is a liberal, leftist or Democrat, though lots of people in them are.

However, that ignorance and those votes might cause more harm than they had the honesty to admit, when those who opposed Obama tried to show them.

[Vagabond]

No silver there.

No Americans, regardless of their political stupidity or naivete, their intellectual bankruptcy, whatever -- including having cast a vote for Obama -- deserve to die because of Obama's and his administration's ineptness and apparent weakness.

And having lived in some of those cities, I assure you that not everyone there is a liberal, leftist or Democrat, though lots of people in them are.

However, that ignorance and those votes might cause more harm than they had the honesty to admit, when those who opposed Obama tried to show them.

I admit I'm having harder and harder finding anything in common with them.  They want to a government to "tell them what to do" and monitor them all the time.  I want a government that leaves it's citizens to themselves as much as possible.  Fundamentally, the worldview of a statist and mine no longer have a thing in common.  At some point, it is no longer even reasinable to attempt to negotiate or reconcile with them, a divorce is better.

[Chris_]

The only silver lining is it will be big liberal city that takes the blow. 

San Fransisco!!  It is of no importance on the world stage and contains nothing but cockroaches!!!

If there is a city that asks for immolation (and pretty much invites it), it is SF!

I don't want an attack, but the insane PC of SF says "attack us first."

[JohnnyReb]

Which would make a bigger impact for the terrorist....take out a few blocks of a large city or wipeout an entire small town?

[GOP Congress]

If the unspeakable happens again, the RWers are already playing their hand. They are with the terrorists. They are already terrorizing the living rooms of middle America, repeatedly telling them to be afraid, be very afraid. They want us to be hit, so they can divide us.

In fact, the above statement is pretty much true...EXCEPT it was not right wing conservatives who said that. Indeed, it was one Mr. Joseph "Plugs" Biden who made this astute, if troubling prediction that is so elucidated above.

[youtube=425,350]http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=LWXOC45IW30[/youtube]

[franksolich]

Link, sir?  Please?

And also when quoting the originally-posting primitive, be sure to include its screen name, so it shows up on "searches."

The primitives are vain people; rather than coming here to be illuminated in the general sense, they come here and look for themselves, and themselves only.

It's highly unlikely the primitives are even aware they get featured in the food forum and the automotive forum here too.

on edit: I retract that statement; I had opened up to page 2, when it's all on page 1 here.  Sorry.

[BlueStateSaint]

Which would make a bigger impact for the terrorist....take out a few blocks of a large city or wipeout an entire small town?

A few blocks of a large city.  The economic impact of New York City not being safe would be far greater than, say, Clifton Park NY being wiped out.

[NHSparky]

A few blocks of a large city.  The economic impact of New York City not being safe would be far greater than, say, Clifton Park NY being wiped out.

Economically speaking, perhaps.  If you want to create REAL fear in the majority of citizens, you take out the small town.  More people live in those types of areas than in large cities.  In doing so you create the, "It can happen ANYWHERE" mentality.

[GOP Congress]

Actually, targets in children-rich zones would cause the most fear, and instill the greatest trauma to most people to react. But I won't get more specific and leave it at that, as frankly I think that's an inappropriate subject to broach in a non-security specific forum.

[Rebel]

I'd say the Mall of America in Islamic-occupied Minnesota is under severe risk.

[DumbAss Tanker]

It's best not to assist in the generation of a target list, but it is a maxim of terrorism that the more infamous the act and softer the target, the better, for their purposes.   

[USA4ME]

tekisui
 
Repukes Are Politicizing Terrorism Again and Are Seemingly Hoping For Another Attack  

The RWers are out with their latest politicization of terror meme. They are trying to lay the foundation that Obama's efforts to improve our standing in the world are going to cause terrorism. They are attempting to lay the blame on Obama for any future attacks, which they are frothing at the mouth to occur.

Somethings wrong here, other than the obvious lie that RWers want another attack, although if it does happen then BHO will be to blame.

The DUmmies were the one's who were consistently saying the attacks were going to be initiated by the BFEE from the WH planning rooms in order to keep people in fear, fear, fear.  Now they're talking about terrorism as though it is really Islamic militants.  Unless, of course, they might still believe the BFEE can still attack from their underground bunker located somewhere in Washington, D.C. or Langley.  If that's the case, then they're admitting that BHO is to stupid to know how to twart it.

.